FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2008, 06:12 AM   #91
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
If you do not have any credible evidence that Tactitus and Clement said that most of the Christians who Nero killed died as martyrs, you lose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
Clement is fairly clear on the topic and I haven't read anything questioning 1 Clement's authenticity or dating between 80-140. We've already been over what Tacitus' says.
Please quote where Clement says that most of the Christians who Nero killed died as martyrs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Since Christian historians are already wrong regarding many historical claims, their judgment is supect unless a consensus of secular historians agrees with them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
A good many secular historians agree with them, surely that shows that their opinion in this area isn't just some religious fantasy that follows purely ideological lines.
But not a consensus of secular historians which you originally said is that case. You originally said that there is somewhat of a consensus of Christian and secular historians who agree with you. That means a consensus of Christian historians, and a separate consensus of secular historians. How many secular historians have you produced who claim that the majority of Christians who Nero persecuted died as martyrs?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 02-08-2008, 12:44 PM   #92
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Please quote where Clement says that most of the Christians who Nero killed died as martyrs.
Now you are the one moving the goal posts. I haven't been arguing that the Christians killed under Nero died as martyrs. I've been arguing that Nero killed alot of Christians following the Great Fire of Rome. I have no idea whether or not Nero really cared about how deeply held their religious convictions were. Clement's letter was written in 97 CE and says that to the martyrs Peter and Paul "should be added a great multitude of the elect, who, having through envy endured many indignities and tortures, furnished us with a most excellent example."

Quote:
You originally said that there is somewhat of a consensus of Christian and secular historians who agree with you. That means a consensus of Christian historians, and a separate consensus of secular historians. How many secular historians have you produced who claim that the majority of Christians who Nero persecuted died as martyrs?
I have since then said many times that there is quite alot more disagreement over this issue than I realized. I have posted around 12 or 13 sources who attest to Nero killing alot of Christians. The exact circumstances concerning how those Christians were picked and if they were given a chance to recant is lost. I doubt Nero really cared that much about the strength of the victims religious convictions.
Champion is offline  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:12 PM   #93
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion View Post
Clement's letter was written in 97 CE
no, it's a mid to late second century patchwork
fraudulently assigned to that fictional Clement of Rome
only later by the churchfathers.

Klaus Schilling
schilling.klaus is offline  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:14 PM   #94
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Please quote where Clement says that most of the Christians who Nero killed died as martyrs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
Now you are the one moving the goal posts.
No I didn't. Although I did discuss what Andrew Criddle said about large numbers of Christians being persecuted by Nero, that was my secondary argument. My primary argumment was my first argument, which was as follows:

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Christians seem to be passionate for no real reason. They have nothing to gain and voluntarily forgo many of the world's "pleasures" for no apparent gain.
It was that claim by rhutchin that was my main reason for starting this thread, and the claim had to do with martyrdom, not just with how many Christians were persecuted. You ought to know that that fundie sacred cow depends not only upon large numbers of Christians being persecuted, but also upon most of them dying as martyrs.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 02-12-2008, 04:15 PM   #95
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
It was that claim by rhutchin that was my main reason for starting this thread, and the claim had to do with martyrdom, not just with how many Christians were persecuted. You ought to know that that fundie sacred cow depends not only upon large numbers of Christians being persecuted, but also upon most of them dying as martyrs.
If that is where this discussion stands, then I'm not going to claim my sources say something they don't. The sources I posted support Tacitus' contention that Christians were selected by Nero as scapegoats for the Great Fire of Rome. Church tradition is a little more specific on the details and one can infer from various historical sites the means and methods Nero employed, but beyond what I already said, the issue is to gray to make a definitive statement. Out of curiousity, how do you define martyrs? Certainly some of them were probably martyred, others were probably just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Champion is offline  
Old 02-12-2008, 04:23 PM   #96
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
It was that claim by rhutchin that was my main reason for starting this thread, and the claim had to do with martyrdom, not just with how many Christians were persecuted. You ought to know that that fundie sacred cow depends not only upon large numbers of Christians being persecuted, but also upon most of them dying as martyrs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
If that is where this discussion stands, then I'm not going to claim my sources say something they don't. The sources I posted support Tacitus' contention that Christians were selected by Nero as scapegoats for the Great Fire of Rome. Church tradition is a little more specific on the details and one can infer from various historical sites the means and methods Nero employed, but beyond what I already said, the issue is to gray to make a definitive statement. Out of curiousity, how do you define martyrs? Certainly some of them were probably martyred, others were probably just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I define martyrs as 1) people who are given a given a chance to recant their beliefs, but refuse to do so, or 2) people who are killed without being asked whether or not they want to recant their beliefs. If you had paid better attention to the opening post, you would not have wasted a lot of your time.
As it was, I did not waste my time because I got some good practice for when I debate fundies again regarding this issue. Thanks very much for helping me develop better arguments.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 02-17-2008, 03:06 PM   #97
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
I define martyrs as 1) people who are given a given a chance to recant their beliefs, but refuse to do so, or 2) people who are killed without being asked whether or not they want to recant their beliefs. If you had paid better attention to the opening post, you would not have wasted a lot of your time.
As it was, I did not waste my time because I got some good practice for when I debate fundies again regarding this issue. Thanks very much for helping me develop better arguments.
I suppose that ends our charming little discussion.
Champion is offline  
Old 02-17-2008, 04:34 PM   #98
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
I define martyrs as 1) people who are given a given a chance to recant their beliefs, but refuse to do so, or 2) people who are killed without being asked whether or not they want to recant their beliefs. If you had paid better attention to the opening post, you would not have wasted a lot of your time.

As it was, I did not waste my time because I got some good practice for when I debate fundies again regarding this issue. Thanks very much for helping me develop better arguments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
I suppose that ends our charming little discussion.
That is fine. As I said, "If you had paid better attention to the opening post, you would not have wasted a lot of your time. As it was, I did not waste my time because I got some good practice for when I debate fundies again regarding this issue. Thanks very much for helping me develop better arguments."
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.