Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Magus55 · 02-26-2004, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Plognark
We care because, well, some people DO take it seriously, and that's a scary prospect.

Taking God seriously is not a scary prospect.

Plognark · 02-26-2004, 12:15 PM

OH I beg to differ. It scares the crap out of me

Let me rephrase; people who take the portrayal of god as shown in any number of moldy tomes on this planet scare me.

Damian · 02-26-2004, 12:17 PM

I thought it was quite obvious to me that the real question is "how do creationists explain the apparent evolution qualities of humans, such as nipples?"

I didn't realize belief in God meant a lack of a sense of humor.

Magus55 · 02-26-2004, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Plognark
OH I beg to differ. It scares the crap out of me

Let me rephrase; people who take the portrayal of god as shown in any number of moldy tomes on this planet scare me.

The immorality and obnoxious attitude of atheists scares me.

Jade · 02-26-2004, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Magus55
The immorality and obnoxious attitude of atheists scares me.

Immorality?

breathilizer · 02-26-2004, 12:29 PM

Hey Magus, why don't you stop assuming the intent of the question and just answer the damn thing?

breathilizer · 02-26-2004, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Magus55
The immorality and obnoxious attitude of atheists scares me.

{deleted} You know we have morals. You just hate the fact that we have morals and it conflicts with your faith.

Rymmie1981 · 02-26-2004, 12:46 PM

1. Jesus is fully God.
2. Jesus is fully Man.
3. Anything with nipples is capable of producing milk.*
4. Men have nipples.
5. God has nipples.
6. It is possible to milk God.

*All mammals, whether males or female, can produce milk if the right hormones are present in right amounts. Males have all the glands and ducts that females have. The only difference in primates is that females have fat deposits that we call breasts.
And, so that I am not accused of making an unfounded assumption, here is a link.

breathilizer · 02-26-2004, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rymmie1981
6. It is possible to milk God.

Holy cow!

Naked Ape · 02-26-2004, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Magus55
I think <snip>

I thought you believed.

Quote:

Originally posted by Magus55
<snip> Its a pretty pointless topic with the sole purpose of making fun of Christian theology.

Well what else would you expect sentient creatures to do with Christian theology?

I think the bigger question is "Did Adam and Eve have belly buttons?"

Cheers,

Naked Ape

02-26-2004, 12:46 PM	#18
Rymmie1981 Regular Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: At the Edge of the River Posts: 499	Milking it till it's dry. 1. Jesus is fully God. 2. Jesus is fully Man. 3. Anything with nipples is capable of producing milk.* 4. Men have nipples. 5. God has nipples. 6. It is possible to milk God. *All mammals, whether males or female, can produce milk if the right hormones are present in right amounts. Males have all the glands and ducts that females have. The only difference in primates is that females have fat deposits that we call breasts. And, so that I am not accused of making an unfounded assumption, here is a link.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

02-26-2004, 12:15 PM	#12
Plognark Contributor Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 14,952	OH I beg to differ. It scares the crap out of me Let me rephrase; people who take the portrayal of god as shown in any number of moldy tomes on this planet scare me.

02-26-2004, 12:17 PM	#13
Damian Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,182	I thought it was quite obvious to me that the real question is "how do creationists explain the apparent evolution qualities of humans, such as nipples?" I didn't realize belief in God meant a lack of a sense of humor.

02-26-2004, 12:29 PM	#16
breathilizer Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 3,090	Hey Magus, why don't you stop assuming the intent of the question and just answer the damn thing?

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.