Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-30-2003, 12:16 AM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
Quote:
Anyways, in the great Assumptions Game where you score the most points by stretching the text to your historical/mythical Junior--also extra credit for using terms such as kerygma, parousia, and sitz im leiben--this make me wonder if the historical Junior did adhere strictly to the rules. However, Mk does not seem as concerned with it problem. Who knows? --J.D. |
|
12-30-2003, 10:23 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Mark does appear concerned about this topic. So much so that he makes an effort to portray the disciples as entirely misunderstanding Jesus' views on it. The author appears to me to be arguing against Jewish Christians with this depiction and winning that argument seems to be one of his primary concerns when he wrote the story. |
|
12-30-2003, 04:23 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
Merde!
To avoid this degenerating into seventeen pages of parsing "concern" ala the previous parsing of "embarrassment"--Mk does not continuously berate the Hapless Ones for a concern about eating rituals--the disciples do not ask Junior about it. However, Mk does berate them for not recognizing Junior as a "son of a god"--whatever that means for Mk--which--again playing the Great Assumption Game--suggests that whatever he confronted--traditions, actually remnants of the Jerusalem Group--did not consider Junior a "son of a god." --J.D. |
12-30-2003, 06:10 PM | #14 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think Vinnie is attempting to address this subject in his similarly themed thread. It may be the end to our recent bout of agreement. |
||
12-30-2003, 07:22 PM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
|
Quote:
|
|
12-30-2003, 09:09 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
But what if they have fins and scales?
|
12-31-2003, 10:02 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up Shit Creek
Posts: 1,810
|
Gross humor deleted by mod. Please stay on topic and avoid offensive imagery. Thank you
|
12-31-2003, 12:20 PM | #18 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 246
|
Re: Why aren't Christians Kosher?
Quote:
Quote:
Besides, jesus did not keep the laws of the Torah. He worked on the sabbath, spoke against the dietary laws and changed lots of rules of the Torah. |
||
12-31-2003, 01:27 PM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up Shit Creek
Posts: 1,810
|
"Gross humor deleted by mod. Please stay on topic and avoid offensive imagery. Thank you"
Oh Ye of little stomach....jelly for nerves...and tolerant of only tolerance.... I was right on topic...trying to point out the absurdity of such a topic.... ....but yeah that was pretty offensive...sorry 'bout that. No, thank you for keeping humor at the minimum. Can't have funnies slipping into a serious discussion about what God wants us to eat and crap out..... Seriously though, There are Kosher Christians....7th Day Adventists. Church on Saturday, strict dietary laws, OT governed relationships, Patriarchal.... I guess they are now called Primitive Baptists. A famous group that split from them was David Koresh's Branch Davidians. But that's a long story that starts in the mid-to-late 19th century America.... A lot of Messanic and Apocolyptic non-denomonational Christians do follow OT laws to some extent. Even dietary laws.... |
12-31-2003, 08:13 PM | #20 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Scottsboro, Al.
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|