Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-06-2007, 07:55 AM | #141 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
|
02-06-2007, 07:56 AM | #142 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
Stephen |
|
02-06-2007, 09:13 AM | #143 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Ben. |
|
02-07-2007, 07:02 AM | #144 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
Quote:
Note how easily Tertullian thought to refute Marcion his own alleged text, i.e. “I would have encountered singly the several devices of the Pontic heretic, if it were not much more convenient to refute them in and with that very gospel to which they contribute their support.” AM 4.1. A single example, that Marcion would have distributed a gospel with the blind man’s salutation "Son of David" (Luke 18:38-39 cf AM 4.36), when such a statement contradicts almost every Marcionite doctrine, is ludicrous in the extreme. So no, Tertullian did not have the Evangelion as originally come from Marcion; at best he had a version that was already somewhat catholicized, intermediate between the Evangelion and canonical Luke. Jake Jones IV |
|
02-07-2007, 12:55 PM | #145 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
The Evangelion attributed to Marcion by the Heresiologists was not identical to the one originally produced by him.
This makes it difffcult to know with assurance the answer to questions about "What did Marcion believe?" One cannot with confidence assume that the gospel attributed by Tertullian to Marcion was an accurate protrayal of Marcionite scripture or beliefs. In "Refutation of the Sects" (441-449 CE), Book IV, Eznik of Kolb, the fifth century Armenian philosopher describes a forgotten myth, which is said to be the original myth of Marcionism. Despite the relatively late date of the Eznik's writing, we may have something close to the foundation myth of Marcionite Christianity. The Demiurge, when confronted with the glorious Jesus whom he had crucified believing to be a man and not a god, begs that in compensation for the crime of his ignorance, that Jesus take to heaven all those who would believe in him. This occurs in a seemingly mythical context and is preached to men when Jesus reveals it to Paul. http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/...znik/eznik.htm http://perso.orange.fr/cercle.ernest...rcionmythe.htm There were three Heavens; in the highest was the Good God; in the intermediate the God of the Law; in the lowest, his Angels. Beneath lay Hyle or root-matter. The world was the joint product of the God of the Law and Hyle. The Creative Power perceiving that the world was very good, desired to make man to inhabit it. So Hyle gave him his body and the Creative Power the breath of life, his spirit. And Adam and Eve lived in innocence in Paradise, and did not beget children. And the' God of the Law desired to take Adam from Hyle and make him serve him alone. So taking him aside, he said: "Adam, I am God and beside me there is no other; if thou worshippest any other God thou shalt die the death." And Adam on hearing of death was afraid, and withdrew himself from Hyle. Now Hyle had been wont to serve Adam; but when she found that he withdrew from her, in revenge she filled the world with idolatry, so that men ceased to adore the Lord of Creation. Then was the Creator wrath, and as men died he cast them into Hell (Hades-the Unseen World), from Adam onwards.Jake |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|