FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2012, 10:40 AM   #211
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

In a tradition Catholic service “taste and see” is sung while the Eucharist is given. See what? God's yesh/ousia
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 10:50 AM   #212
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

And oh yes, Psalm 34 reads “taste and see the Lord is chrestos”. This is so ancient it goes back to a Marcionite conception of Jesus
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 11:13 AM   #213
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The point is - whose body is it? In the Syriac rite as noted previously the equivalent of the word 'yesh(n)u' still appears. The name wasn't removed it was rendered literally. In the beginning, the Eucharist was the embodiment of yeshu - the yeshu (ousia) of the Father. Then the orthodox came along and finally - with the reforms of Nicaea - planted scattered the obvious logic of the original cult. In other words, Jesus was the substance of the Father who is consumed by the catechumen in order to have a perfect nature. What remains from Nicaea is completely reactionary against that original understanding and is utterly senseless. How can the Father's essence be totally in heaven but still with 'the Son' here in the world governed by the Son? Senseless, senseless, senseless
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 11:18 AM   #214
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The orthodox (= the Empire) wanted to excise the idea that Jesus/yeshu (= 'His substance') made people perfect. The idea that this is why Jesus came to humanity is gone.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 12:31 PM   #215
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Andrew Criddle's translation of the excerpts of Theodotus have a section which demonstrate that Ibn Ezra's notions were shared by the early Christians (neshama = πνοὴν ζωῆς):
Just to clarify: The translation is by the late Robert Pierce Casey. I only made it available on the Internet.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:32 PM   #216
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Yes, I was using my smart phone and thinking in terms of 'the one Andrew Criddle' introduced to the internet as opposed to the one you see everywhere else.

The next thought that I think I might be decisive. It is well known that under Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175-164 BC) the High Priest Ἰησοῦς (Yesua') allegedly 'changed his name' to Ἰάσων. But the reality is a little more complicated than the way scholars like to portray it. It isn't as if the High Priests name was Ἰησοῦς. He must have had a Hebrew name which he chose as his Greek equivalent Ἰάσων.

Now let's look at Ἰάσων. Could there we a relationship here with the Christian god Yeshu?

Quote:
Jews who bore the name ַשׁוּעֵי and wanted a straight Greek equivalent chose Ἰάσων (Ionic form Ἰήσων, modern ‘Jason’): an equivalence attested in official and governmental contexts. This Greek name actually means ‘healer’ (~ ἰάοµαι) and readily produces etymological puns. Jews who adopted Greek names generally tried to adopt ones nearest in form and meaning to the original. So not only do Ἰησοῦς, the Greek-Jewish form of ‘Joshua’ and the name of a renowned Jewish ‘healer’, and Ἰάσων, the Greek form of Ἰησοῦς/‘Joshua’ and a name which actually means ‘healer’, look similar and mean similar things: from a Hellenistic Jewish perspective, they are actually the same name, as any Jew with a modicum of Greek would have known.

For us it is of course completely immaterial in this sort of context whether they are actually the same name. There are also wider considerations. Not only was ‘healing’ by Ἰησοῦς a central part of his ministry, there was a much larger Jewish healing context in the period. Solomon had a great first-century reputation as a healer (Jos. Ant. 8.45). The Essenes—frequent comparators of Jesus in modern scholarship—were celebrated as healers (Jos. B.J. 2.136), which their very name may mean. While ‘Therapeutae’, the name of the Egyptian Jewish women philosophers, probably means ‘attendants’, both the Jewish Philo (Vit. contempl. 2) and the Christian Eusebius (H.E. 2.16–17) readily connect it with ‘healing’ (which the Therapeutai certainly practised). A few years after Jesus, the Galilaean charismatic Hanina ben Dosa performed similar healings to Jesus’.

The Qumran community (pre-68 CE) expected an ‘anointed one’ who would ‘restore sight to the blind, straighten the bent …, heal the wounded, and give life to the dead’ (4Q521, 12.1, 8, 12). The ‘healing’ of Ἰησοῦς is thus writ all the larger, because he was certainly the greatest Jewish ‘healer’ of the time, and because from the Christian point of view, from the very beginning, and ever afterwards, he was the greatest healer of any race or culture at any time. Obviously, the possibility of punning on the ‘healing’ aspect of Jesus’ name is encouraged by the simple facts that the name of Jesus in its JewishGreek form was vitally important from the start to Christians who operated in Greek (‘in the name of Jesus’, etc.), and that the NT is—through its very use of Greek—propounding a to some extent Hellenised Jesus. And where better to look for such punning than in Classical biographies of Jesus?

The further potentialities of the names also intrigue. The names Ἰάσων and Ἰησοῦς have similar divine associations. Not only does Ἰάσων, the Greek form of Ἰησοῦς, itself the Jewish-Greek form of ‘Joshua’, mean ‘healer’, but it derives from the pagan goddess of healing who is called Ἰάσω (Ἰήσω in Ionic). Thus on the Greek side Ἰάσων is a human name derived from a god’s: a theophoric name, just as on the Jewish side ַשׁוּעֵי is a human name derived from ‘Yahweh’. Furthermore, for the early Christians, this Ἰησοῦς is in some sense, and to some degree, himself a divine figure.

There is also a simple matter of sound. Ἰησοῦς, Ἰάσων and Ἰάσω not only look very similar: they sound very similar. And the sound of names is very important. There is also a matter of extended meaning. There can be important links between ‘saving’, the basic meaning of ‘Joshua’, undeniably punned on in the NT, and ‘healing’, both at the levels of the divine and the quasi-divine and alike in medical, religious/social and political contexts. Given these links and the sound factor, one even wonders whether the many Greek speakers who knew that the Jewish god was denoted by ‘Yahweh’ or ‘Yah’ could also ‘hear’ both Ἰη/σοῦς and Ἰά/σων as ‘Yah saves’ directly, because –σοῦς and –σων could evoke σῴζω and σῶς, and whether bilingual speakers could even regard the Greek σῴζω and the Hebrew verb as cognate [http://research.ncl.ac.uk/histos/doc...ealer11782.pdf]
Of course I would like to turn everything around and argue that the root of Jason - Ἰάσω - is identical with a Greek phonetic rendering of the Hebrew ישו. The argument that Jesus's name was understood to be related to Ἰάσων becomes stronger if the Church Fathers started with ישו rather than Ἰησοῦς which we know they did. Irenaeus identifies Jesus's name as ישו and condemns the use of Ἰησοῦς. So too Ephrem and on the flip side Ignatius, Clement of Alexandria and Cyril of Jerusalem connect his name with ἰάομαι.

I find it a stretch to believe that the early Fathers would have connected a name rooted in the Hebrew verb 'to save' with a name rooted in the Greek verb 'to heal.' Yet if the Christian god's name was yeshu it makes perfect sense. The metaphor of healing is demonstrating the affect of the divine ousia (= yesh). Joshua was not a healer. He 'saved' the nation by military might.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 04:09 PM   #217
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Philo ("De Mutt. Nom.", 21) is therefore, right when he explains Iesous as meaning soteria kyrion; Eusebius (Dem., Ev., IV, ad fin.; P.G., XXII, 333) gives the meaning Theou soterion; while St. Cyril of Jerusalem interprets the word as equivalent to soter (Catechetical Lectures X.13). This last writer, however, appears to agree with Clement of Alexandria in considering the word Iesous as of Greek origin (The Pedagogue III.12); St. Chrysostom emphasizes again the Hebrew derivation of the word and its meaning soter (Homily 2 on Matthew, No. 2), thus agreeing with the exegesis of the angel speaking to St. Joseph (Matthew 1:21).

Given Clement's devotion to Philo, why does he ignore Philo's explanation?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:24 PM   #218
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

It is interesting that so many sources connect Cyril of Jerusalem's claims about the name Jesus meaning 'healer' with Clement of Alexandria's statement at the end of the Paedaogogue:

ὁ ἰώμενος ἡμῶν καὶ σῶμα καὶ ψυχήν, τὸν ὅλον ἄνθρωπον, Ἰησοῦς [Paed 3.12.98]

I've long argued that Cyril's mystical interpretation of the baptism rite presupposes a knowledge of Secret Mark. Of course the critics would argue that the parallels were recognized by Morton Smith and developed in his text. But I think this is a big stretch. In fact, I can't find a single reference in Clement were he actually says 'the name Jesus means healer.' It is implied of course knowing that Cyril and Eusebius propose the etymology and then the sheer repetition in Clement of statements like 'Jesus heals the bodily passions' is explained. Nevertheless the argument for Cyril's knowledge of Secret Mark is actually more compelling but ultimately very similar. Clement's books sat on the shelves of the Jerusalem patriarchate library (and presumably Caesarea later). Clement's relationship with Jerusalem is so intriguing. The Jerusalem Church seems to have had a rebirth in the late portion of the second century with an influx of Alexandrian refugees it seems.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 10:03 PM   #219
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The important passages to look at in Clement of Alexandria:

Quote:
For God bestows life freely; but evil custom, after our departure from this world, brings on the sinner unavailing remorse with punishment. By sad experience, even a child knows how superstition destroys and piety saves. Let any of you look at those who minister before the idols, their hair matted, their persons disgraced with filthy and tattered clothes; who never come near a bath, and let their nails grow to an extraordinary length, like wild beasts; many of them castrated, who show the idol's temples to be in reality graves or prisons. These appear to me to bewail the gods, not to worship them, and their sufferings to be worthy of pity rather than piety. And seeing these things, do you still continue blind, and will you not look up to the Ruler of all, the Lord of the universe? And will you not escape from those dungeons, and flee to the mercy that comes down from heaven? For God, of His great love to man, comes to the help of man, as the mother-bird flies to one of her young that has fallen out of the nest; and if a serpent open its mouth to swallow the little bird, "the mother flutters round, uttering cries of grief over her dear progeny;" and God the Father seeks His creature, and heals his transgression, and pursues the serpent, and recovers the young one, and incites it to fly up to the nest. [Exhort. 10]

ow much better, therefore, is it for men from the beginning not to wish to desire things forbidden, than to obtain their desires! But ye are not able to endure the austerity of salvation; but as we delight in sweet' things, and prize them higher for the agreeableness of the pleasure they yield, while, on the other hand, those bitter things which are distasteful to the palate are curative and healing, and the harshness of medicines strengthens people of weak stomach, thus custom pleases and, tickles; but custom pushes into the abyss, while truth conducts to heaven. [ibid]
And then the very opening words of the Paedagogue make the same manifest the same point:

Quote:
AS there are these three things in the case of man, habits, actions, and passions; habits are the department appropriated by hortatory discourse the guide to piety, which, like the ship's keel, is laid beneath for the building up of faith; in which, rejoicing exceedingly, and abjuring our old opinions, through salvation we renew our youth, singing with the hymning prophecy, "How good is God to Israel, to such as are upright in heart!" All actions, again, are the province of preceptive discourse; while persuasive discourse applies itself to heal the passions. It is, however, one and the self-same word which rescues man from the custom of this world in which he has been reared, and trains him up in the one salvation of faith in God.

When, then, the heavenly guide, the Word, was inviting men to salvation, the appellation of hortatory was properly applied to Him: his same word was called rousing (the whole from a part). For the whole of piety is hortatory, engendering in the kindred faculty of reason a yearning after true life now and to come. But now, being at once curative and preceptive, following in His own steps, He makes what had been prescribed the subject of persuasion, promising the cure of the passions within us. Let us then designate this Word appropriately by the one name Tutor (or Paedagogue, or instructor).

The Instructor being practical, not theoretical, His aim is thus to improve the soul, not to teach, and to train it up to a virtuous, not to an intellectual life. Although this same word is didactic, but not in the present instance. For the word which, in matters of doctrine, explains and reveals, is that whose province it is to teach. But our Educators being practical, first exhorts to the attainment of right dispositions and character, and then persuades us to the energetic practice of our duties, enjoining on us pure commandments, and exhibiting to such as come after representations of those who formerly wandered in error. Both are of the highest utility,--that which assumes the form of counselling to obedience, and that which is presented in the form of example; which latter is of two kinds, corresponding to the former duality,--the one having for its purpose that we should choose and imitate the good, and the other that we should reject and turn away from the opposite.

Hence accordingly ensues the healing of our passions, in consequence of the assuagements of those examples; the Paedagogue strengthening our souls, and by His benign commands, as by gentle medicines, guiding the sick to the perfect knowledge of the truth.

There is a wide difference between health and knowledge; for the latter is produced by learning, the former by healing. One, who is ill, will not therefore learn any branch of instruction till he is quite well. For neither to learners nor to the sick is each injunction invariably expressed similarly; but to the former in such a way as to lead to knowledge, and to the latter to health. As, then, for those of us who are diseased in body a physician is required, so also those who are diseased in soul require a paedagogue to cure our maladies; and then a teacher, to train and guide the soul to all requisite knowledge when it is made able to admit the revelation of the Word. Eagerly desiring, then, to perfect us by a gradation conducive to salvation, suited for efficacious discipline, a beautiful arrangement is observed by the all-benignant Word, who first exhorts, then trains, and finally teaches. [Paed 1.1]

Our Instructor, the Word, therefore cures the unnatural passions of the soul by means of exhortations. For with the highest propriety the help of bodily diseases is called the healing art--an art acquired by human skill. But the paternal Word is the only Paeonian physician of human infirmities, and the holy charmer of the sick soul. "Save," it is said, "Thy servant, O my God, who trusteth in Thee. Pity me, O Lord; for I will cry to Thee all the day." For a while the "physician's art," according to Democritus, "heals the diseases of the body; wisdom frees the soul from passion." But the good Instructor, the Wisdom, the Word of the Father, who made man, cares for the whole nature of His creature; the all-sufficient Physician of humanity, the Saviour, heals both body and soul. "Rise up," He said to the paralytic; "take the bed on which thou liest, and go away home;" and straightway the infirm man received strength. And to the dead He said, "Lazarus, go forth;" and the dead man issued from his coffin such as he was ere he died, having undergone resurrection. Further, He heals the soul itself by precepts and gifts--by precepts indeed, in course of time, but being liberal in His gifts, He says to us sinners, "Thy sins be forgiven thee." [Paed 1.2]

For the vine produces wine, as the Word, produces blood, and both drink for health to men--wine for the body, blood for the spirit. [Paed 1.5]

Wherefore prophecy invests Him with a rod, a rod of discipline, of rule, of authority; that those whom the persuasive word heals not, the threatening may heal; and whom the threatening heals not, the rod may heal; and whom the rod heals not, the fire may devour. "There shall come forth," it is said, "a rod out of the root of Jesse." [Paed 1.7]

Thus also people in health do not require a physician, do not require him as long as they are strong; but those who are ill need his skill. Thus also we who in our lives are ill of shameful lusts and reprehensible excesses, and other inflammatory effects of the passions, need the Saviour. And He administers not only mild, but also stringent medicines. The bitter roots of fear then arrest the eating sores of our sins. Wherefore also fear is salutary, if bitter. Sick, we truly stand in need of the Saviour; having wandered, of one to guide us; blind, of one to lead us to the light; thirsty, "of the fountain of life, of which whosoever partakes, shall no longer thirst;" dead, we need life; sheep, we need a shepherd; we who are children need a tutor, while universal humanity stands in need of Jesus; so that we may not continue intractable and sinners to the end, and thus fall into condemnation, but may be separated from the chaff, and stored up in the paternal garner. "For the fan is in the Lord's hand, by which the chaff due to the fire is separated from the wheat." You may learn, if you will, the crowning wisdom of the all-holy Shepherd and Instructor, of the omnipotent and paternal Word, when He figuratively represents Himself as the Shepherd of the sheep. And He is the Tutor of the children. He says therefore by Ezekiel, directing His discourse to the elders, and setting before them a salutary description of His wise solicitude: "And that which is lame I will bind up, and that which is sick I will heal, and that which has wandered I will turn back; and I will feed them on my holy mountain." Such are the promises of the good Shepherd. [Paed 1.9]

But the Instructor enjoins us to eat that we may live. For neither is food our business, nor is pleasure our aim; but both are on account of our life here, which the Word is training up to immortality. Wherefore also there is discrimination to be employed in reference to food. And it is to be simple, truly plain, suiting precisely simple and artless children--as ministering to life, not to luxury. And the life to which it conduces consists of two things--health and strength; to which plainness of fare is most suitable, being conducive both to digestion and lightness of body, from which come growth, and health, and right strength, not strength that is wrong or dangerous and wretched, as is that of athletes produced by compulsory feeding. [Paed 2.1]

"Honour the physician for his usefulness," says the Scripture, "for the Most High made him; and the art of healing is of the Lord." Then he adds, "And the compounder of unguents will make the mixture," since unguents have been given manifestly for use, not for voluptuousness. For we are by no means to care for the exciting properties of unguents, but to choose what is useful in them, since God hath permitted the production of oil for the mitigation of men's pains. [Paed 2.8]

Jesus, who heals both our body and soul--which are the proper man. [Paed 3.12]

For the saving Word is called "wholesome," He being the truth; and what is wholesome (healthful) remains ever deathless. But separation from what is healthful and divine is impiety, and a deadly malady. [Strom 1.8]

And as in husbandry, so also in medicine: he has learned to purpose, who has practised the various lessons, so as to be able to cultivate and to heal. [Strom 1.9]

Besides, for the sake of bodily health we submit to incisions, and cauterizations, and medicinal draughts; and he who administers them is called saviour and healer even though amputating parts, not from grudge or ill-will towards the patient, but as the principles of the art prescribe, so that the sound parts may not perish along with them, and no one accuses the physician's art of wickedness; and shall we not similarly submit, for the soul's Sake, to either banishment, or punishment, or bonds, provided only from unrighteousness we shall attain to righteousness? For the law, in its solicitude for those who obey, trains up to piety, and prescribes what is to be done, and restrains each one from sins, imposing penalties even on lesser sins. But when it sees any one in such a condition as to appear incurable, posting to the last stage of wickedness, then in its solicitude for the rest, that they may not be destroyed by it (just as if amputating a part from the whole body), it condemns such an one to death, as the course most conducive to health. [Strom 1.27]

And is not the demonstration, which we possess, that alone which is true, as being supplied out of the divine Scriptures, the sacred writings, and out of the "God-taught wisdom," according to the apostle? Learning, then, is also obedience to the commandments, which is faith in God. And faith is a power of God, being the strength of the truth. For example, it is said, "If ye have faith as a grain of mustard, ye shall remove the mountain." And again, "According to thy faith let it be to thee." And one is cured, receiving healing by faith; and the dead is raised up in consequence of the power of one believing that he would be raised. [Strom 2.11]

What then? Does not the Saviour who heals the soul also heal the body of its passions? But if the flesh were hostile to the soul, he would not have raised an obstacle to the soul by strengthening with good health the hostile flesh. "This I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God nor corruption incorruption." For sin being corruption cannot have fellowship with incorruption which is righteousness. " Are you so foolish?" he says; "having begun in the Spirit are you now to be made perfect by the flesh." [Strom 3.17]

Wherefore in the third book of the Republic, Plato, whom they appeal to loudly as an authority that disparages generation, says, "that for the sake of harmony of soul, care must be taken for the body," by which, he who announces the proclamation of the truth, finds it possible to live, and to live well. For it is by the path of life and health that we learn gnosis. But is he who cannot advance to the height without being occupied with necessary things, and through them doing what tends to knowledge, not to choose to live well? In living, then, living well is secured. And he who in the body has devoted himself to a good life, is being sent on to the state of immortality. [Strom 4.4]

And if we really look to the truth of the matter, knowledge is the purification of the leading faculty of the soul, and is a good activity. Some things accordingly are good in themselves, and others by participation in what is good, as we say good actions are good. But without things intermediate which hold the place of material, neither good nor bad actions are constituted, such I mean as life, and health, and other necessary things or circumstantials. Pure then as respects corporeal lusts, and pure in respect of holy thoughts, he means those are, who attain to the knowledge of God, when the chief faculty of the soul has nothing spurious to stand in the way of its power. When, therefore, he who partakes gnostically of this holy quality devotes himself to contemplation, communing in purity with the divine, he enters more nearly into the state of impassible identity, so as no longer to have science and possess knowledge, but to be science and knowledge. [Strom 4.6]

For, in fine, the agreement and harmony of the faith of both contribute to one end -- salvation. We have in the apostle an unerring witness: "For I desire to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, in order that ye may be strengthened; that is, that I may be comforted in you, by the mutual faith of you and me." And further on again he adds, "The righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith." The apostle, then, manifestly announces a twofold faith, or rather one which admits of growth and perfection; for the common faith lies beneath as a foundation. To those, therefore, who desire to be healed, and are moved by faith, He added, "Thy faith hath saved thee." But that which is excellently built upon is consummated in the believer, and is again perfected by the faith which results from instruction and the word, in order to the performance of the commandments. Such were the apostles, in whose case it is said that "faith removed mountains and transplanted trees." Whence, perceiving the greatness of its power, they asked "that faith might be added to them;" a faith which salutarily bites the soil "like a grain of mustard," and grows magnificently in it, to such a degree that the reasons of things sublime rest on it. [Strom 5.1]

Accordingly, pain is found beneficial in the healing art, and in discipline, and in punishment; and by it men's manners are corrected to their advantage. [Strom 7.3]

For my view is, that as all things are supplied to the man of art according to the rules of art, and to the Gentile in a Gentile way, so also to the Gnostic all things are supplied gnostically. And the man who turns from among the Gentiles will ask for faith, while he that ascends to knowledge will ask for the perfection of love. And the Gnostic, who has reached the summit, will pray that contemplation may grow and abide, as the common man will for continual good health [Strom 7.7]

For all good is capable of being produced in the Gnostic; if indeed it is his aim to know and do everything intelligently. And as the physician ministers health to those who co-operate with him in order to health, so also God ministers eternal salvation to those who co-operate for the attainment of knowledge and good conduct; and since what the commandments enjoin are in our own power, along with the performance of them, the promise is accomplished. [ibid]

In all circumstances, then, is the soul of the Gnostic strong, in a condition of extreme health and strength, like the body of an athlete. For he is prudent in human affairs, in judging what ought to be done by the just man; having obtained the principles from God from above, and having acquired, in order to the divine resemblance, moderation in bodily pains and pleasures. And he struggles against fears boldly, trusting in God. Certainly, then, the gnostic soul, adorned with perfect virtue, is the earthly image of the divine power; its development being the joint result of nature, of training, of reason, all together. This beauty of the soul becomes a temple of the Holy Spirit, when it acquires a disposition in the whole of life corresponding to the Gospel. [Strom 7.11]

The knowledge of the truth among us from what is already believed, produces faith in what is not yet believed; which [faith] is, so to speak, the essence of demonstration. But, as appears, no heresy has at all ears to hear what is useful, but opened only to what leads to pleasure. Since also, if one of them would only obey the truth, he would be healed. [Strom 7.16]

Now the cure of self-conceit (as of every ailment) is threefold: the ascertaining of the cause, and the mode of its removal; and thirdly, the training of the soul, and the accustoming it to assume a right attitude to the judgments come to. For, just like a disordered eye, so also the soul that has been darkened by unnatural dogmas cannot perceive distinctly the light of truth, but even overlooks what is before it. [ibid]

For it appears to me to be far kinder, than basely to flatter the rich and praise them for what is bad, to aid them in working out their salvation in every possible way; asking this of God, who surely and sweetly bestows such things on His own children; and thus by the grace of the Saviour healing their souls, enlightening them and leading them to the attainment of the truth; and whosoever obtains this and distinguishes himself in good works shall gain the prize of everlasting life. [QDS 1]

Suppose the matter to be a law-suit. Let your father be imagined to present himself to you and say, "I begot and reared thee. Follow me, and join with me in wickedness, and obey not the law of Christ;" and whatever a man who is a blasphemer and dead by nature would say. But on the other side hear the Saviour: "I regenerated thee, who wert ill born by the world to death. I emancipated, healed, ransomed thee. I will show thee the face of the good Father God. Call no man thy father on earth. Let the dead bury the dead; but follow thou Me. For I will bring thee to a rest of ineffable and unutterable blessings, which eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, nor have entered into the heart of men; into which angels desire to look, and see what good things God hath prepared for the saints and the children who love Him." I am He who feeds thee, giving Myself as bread, of which he who has tasted experiences death no more, and supplying day by day the drink of immortality. I am teacher of supercelestial lessons. For thee I contended with Death, and paid thy death, which thou owedst for thy former sins and thy unbelief towards God." [QDS 23]

The word which proclaims the kingdom of heaven is sharp and pungent as mustard, and represses bile, that is, anger, and checks inflammation, that is, pride; and from this word the soul's true health and eternal soundness flow. To such increased size did the growth of the word come, that the tree which sprang from it (that is the Church of Christ established over the whole earth) filled the world, so that the fowls of the air--that is, divine angels and lofty souls--dwelt in its branches. [Nicetas Catena on Matthew]
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 11:52 PM   #220
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

A few observations. There can be no doubt that the Alexandrian tradition understood Jesus to be the healer who heals through the gift of the Eucharist. I would take that to be the point of connection between the Hebrew concept of ישו (= the substance of the Father) and Ἰάσω. Consuming the divine yesh leads to the 'healing of the passions' of the body. The bottom line is that the god of the Christians had a name which resembled the sound of ישו/Ἰάσω and whose substance healed.

Also, notice the repeated appeal to (a) the parable of the mustard seed and (b) something resembling "thy faith hath saved thee." I wonder if Christian faith was originally more specific than previously thought (or rather completely distinct from the notion of a set of ideas expressed in a Creed).
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.