FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2005, 07:02 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Hi Guys, I know when I'm being talked about...

Right then, down to business...

1) Gunnaheave (a 'he', by the way) did not unilaterally move the thread to ~E~. He discussed it with the other GRD moderators first - and the general agreement of those who were online was that the thread was ~E~ material.

2) Complaints about moderation should be either posted in a P&C (Problems and Complaints) thread, or reported via the "Report Post" button, not brought up in the thread itself.

3) No-one has been censored. Your thread has merely been moved to a more suitable location, not deleted.

4) At the moment, I see no reason to move this thread a second time - but I will bring up the issue in the MCR (Moderator Conference Room - the place where we discuss these things) and get a second opinion or two.
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 07:51 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 51
Unhappy The point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy


3) No-one has been censored. Your thread has merely been moved to a more suitable location, not deleted.

4) At the moment, I see no reason to move this thread a second time - but I will bring up the issue in the MCR (Moderator Conference Room - the place where we discuss these things) and get a second opinion or two.
Some of the greatest frustrations I have are:

1. the Media trying to cater to the fundamentalists feelings by sensoring facts we have through science that completely discredit their faith.

2. N.A.S.A. having to ask the religious right for their support of the mission to Mars for fear they would through their vast political power strip their funding. (This really happened)

3. The fact that there are THOUSANDS of religious television programs and THOUSANDS of fundementalist christian websites and only a spattering of infidel ones.

So when I post news about a top religious figure who has used his religious power to have MAJOR negative political influence in my country the U.S.A. on one of the rare places for me to supposedly freely speak my mind, and have moderators claim it has NOTHING to do with religion, which is exactly what was said, what am I to think about this rare infidel site? It makes me feel alone and feel like just giving up. Aren't we alienated and bullied enough?

emeralds
emeraldsforest is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 08:15 AM   #13
soren625
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
2. N.A.S.A. having to ask the religious right for their support of the mission to Mars for fear they would through their vast political power strip their funding. (This really happened)
I would be interested to read about this, could you post a link?
 
Old 03-30-2005, 12:20 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
Although, presumably, Falwell believes he has a god-given 'golden rule' that runs along the lines of 'do unto others as you would have others to do unto you'. So where's the problem with him receiving back what he's given out in the past? Perhaps some of the people, who feel that Emeralds Forest et al are acting 'not nice', will come to understand that Falwell is a bit of a bigotted hypocrite.
Sure. So what?

Quote:
You do feel that he's a bigotted hypocrite, don't you Seebs?
He certainly acts like one. So?

Quote:
By the way Seebs, is your god the same god as Falwell's god, or do you think that the two gods are different gods?
I tend to assume there's only the one... But people certainly have different theories about that God's nature.

But I don't see how Falwell's bigotry and cruelty justify bigotry and cruelty in others. It seems more like imitation than like considered criticism.
seebs is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 12:24 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emeraldsforest
I can't emulate his methods. I don't believe in Hell. Of course, one of the pleasures I had to give up becoming atheist.
If that was one of the pleasures...

Quote:
Instead I was making a point of hypocrisy. I have no book which I hold dear sets of dogma. Therefore, what hypocrisy am I showing?
You act as though his behavior is wrong, but you're doing the same thing he is. You are indeed making a point of hypocrisy.

Quote:
I think the man is disgusting not for just condemning others, but for leading a group of suckers, including children, into his nazi-like frenzies and creating Degree Mills which purpose is to discredit centuries of degrees awarded to people who really earn them, among other attrocities. If you think I have reflected hatred toward the fatso, then you again are wrong. I don't hate assholes necessarily, they and their ilk simply make me sick to my stomach. "Hate" is a christian virtue and a perhaps difficult for you to realize, just a bit more extreme than my thoughts here. You will rarely find me even using the word on these sites.
You don't have to use the word to show the virtue. Given the amount of direct and unambiguous condemnation of hatred throughout the Bible, saying that hate is a Christian virtue is nothing but a petty attempt to show how much you... well, strongly dislike ... Christianity. Of course, in so doing, you're doing exactly what Falwell is; preaching against a straw man. You're attacking "Christianity" when your objection is to certain Christians. Falwell bashes atheists because he thinks Stalin is bad...

Either way, the real point is that there's an Us and a Them, and the Them need to be called out on the carpet and villified.

The behaviors are indistinguishable. Falwell gloats about the suffering of the groups he dislikes, you gloat about the suffering of someone you dislike.

You can say it's not hatred, but I think gloating about someone's suffering is enough like hatred to pass the duck test.
seebs is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 12:37 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
Default

Quote:
So when I post news about a top religious figure who has used his religious power to have MAJOR negative political influence in my country the U.S.A. on one of the rare places for me to supposedly freely speak my mind, and have moderators claim it has NOTHING to do with religion, which is exactly what was said, what am I to think about this rare infidel site? It makes me feel alone and feel like just giving up. Aren't we alienated and bullied enough?
This is a topic worthy of discussion! Too bad it wasn't the OP of your thread, which is why I suspect, it was moved to the land of ~E~.

If this had been your opening post, I would agree with you, but this isn't the case. Instead you open with a bad play on words in regards to Falwell's name, and end the post by referring to his weight. It just seems kinda, childish, really. As it happens I agree with you. He is a hypocrite, and he has caused a lot of harm, and personally, I'm think the world would be better off if he bought the farm. Agricultural real estate comes cheaply these days.
braces_for_impact is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 01:35 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: calgary, ab
Posts: 690
Default

Yeah, Emeralds; while I agree with your opinion, I do disagree with how you put it. Falwell's a hypocrite - that much was apparent years ago when he used TV (a scientific discovery) to broadcast (more science) his hate-filled, anti-science bullshit. It's just too bad that he had to live long enough to bilk the credulous out of their money & minds. But, I suppose, if if wasn't Falwell, it would have been some other charlatan.

Sorry about this getting moved to E, but II doesn't (yet) have a 'Hate-filled Charlatans' category.



:devil1:
regis is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 01:54 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva
Posts: 5,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
Sure. So what?
So what?
So, it's just possible that Falwellphiles will be so shocked by people making comments such as Emeralds' about Falwell that they will also notice Falwell's bigotry. If reason hasn't worked with them, then some people might think that trying to shock them is worth a try. Perhaps they will realise that it is not nice of Falwell to kick the people he hates when they're down, after they see the people who hate Falwell kicking him when he is down?
Quote:
He certainly acts like one. So?
Cute wording. Are you willing to say that Falwell is a Christian, or are you only prepared to say that he certainly acts like one?
Quote:
I tend to assume there's only the one... But people certainly have different theories about that God's nature.

But I don't see how Falwell's bigotry and cruelty justify bigotry and cruelty in others. It seems more like imitation than like considered criticism.
Except that Emeralds 'bigotry and cruelty' (don't you think your view of Emeralds' words are a bit harsh here Seebs?) were directed only at Falwell.

Falwell is only suffering a little payback from Emeralds here, a minor case of 'if you live by the sword then you die by the sword'. In my book, it is perfectly OK to act like a bastard towards someone once (s)he has shown themselves to be a bastard to other people. I don't remember hearing of many leading Christians going out of their way to tell Falwell to stop being rude about the people he hated, but yet you're here telling Emeralds that it's not nice to laugh at a fat old bigot when he's down? I mean, what gives?
Why did you post on this thread Seebs?

Given that it was only ten minutes before Gunnaheave posted the decision to move this thread to Elsewhere, can we assume that he had already consulted you (and any other GRD Mod on line at the time, if any) even if you had not yet come to a collective decision on moving this thread prior to posting your own post?

If so, did you only post as a gloat to Emeralds, Seebs? I really hope not, but I can't see any other reason at the moment. Sorry.

Luxie
post tenebras lux is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:17 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
So what?
So, it's just possible that Falwellphiles will be so shocked by people making comments such as Emeralds' about Falwell that they will also notice Falwell's bigotry.
That seems very unlikely.

Quote:
If reason hasn't worked with them, then some people might think that trying to shock them is worth a try. Perhaps they will realise that it is not nice of Falwell to kick the people he hates when they're down, after they see the people who hate Falwell kicking him when he is down?
I think the people who have been following along with Falwell are probably resistant to empathy.

Quote:
Cute wording. Are you willing to say that Falwell is a Christian, or are you only prepared to say that he certainly acts like one?
I don't know whether or not he's actually a Christian. He does not act as I feel Christians are called to act, but then, many people don't. I am inclined to assume he's a Christian; I tend to take people at face value on such questions.

But to say that someone is a hypocritical bastard is too close to denying the possibility that there is good in them as well, however well-hidden.

Quote:
Except that Emeralds 'bigotry and cruelty' (don't you think your view of Emeralds' words are a bit harsh here Seebs?) were directed only at Falwell.
I think the words were precise. And yes, of course, they were directed only at Falwell. So? Is cruelty excusable because we direct it towards people we think are bad?

Quote:
Falwell is only suffering a little payback from Emeralds here, a minor case of 'if you live by the sword then you die by the sword'. In my book, it is perfectly OK to act like a bastard towards someone once (s)he has shown themselves to be a bastard to other people.
Well, then, even if I am in fact acting like a bastard, it's perfectly okay, because emeralds has done the same.

But in fact, I think that view of the world is ultimately doomed; in fact, that view is one of the most consistent flaws in Falwell. He is unwilling to extend charity.

So why, then, should we imitate this flaw?

Quote:
I don't remember hearing of many leading Christians going out of their way to tell Falwell to stop being rude about the people he hated, but yet you're here telling Emeralds that it's not nice to laugh at a fat old bigot when he's down? I mean, what gives?
Confirmation bias. The regular stream of Christians condemning Falwell's actions are uninteresting because they do not support an existing conclusion. Watch the famous TV dialogue between Jackson and Falwell.

Many Christians chastise Falwell, both publically and privately.

But who cares? Falwell isn't posting his filth on IIDB. If he were, I'd chew him out for it.

Quote:
Why did you post on this thread Seebs?
Because I do not believe that cruelty towards a man who may be dying is a virtue.

Quote:
Given that it was only ten minutes before Gunnaheave posted the decision to move this thread to Elsewhere, can we assume that he had already consulted you (and any other GRD Mod on line at the time, if any) and that you had come to a collective decision on moving this thread prior to posting your own post?
The details of moderator decisions are, of course, confidential. I will say that I was aware that the thread was a candidate for Elsewhere, and I might have moved it myself. However, I also felt that it deserved a response in-thread.

Quote:
If so, did you only post as a gloat to Emeralds, Seebs? I really hope not, but I can't see any other reason at the moment. Sorry.
I can't see how it could be gloating at all. Whether the thread is in GRD or Elsewhere doesn't change its substance.
seebs is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:18 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by regis
Yeah, Emeralds; while I agree with your opinion, I do disagree with how you put it. Falwell's a hypocrite - that much was apparent years ago when he used TV (a scientific discovery) to broadcast (more science) his hate-filled, anti-science bullshit. It's just too bad that he had to live long enough to bilk the credulous out of their money & minds. But, I suppose, if if wasn't Falwell, it would have been some other charlatan.

Sorry about this getting moved to E, but II doesn't (yet) have a 'Hate-filled Charlatans' category.
I tend to agree with this. It's not as though there's a shortage of ludicrously wealthy TV evangelists to take his place...
seebs is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.