FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2009, 10:05 PM   #151
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default Naming Names

Hi Tim,

I haven't posted this list in a while. Here are 70 authors who support some sort of Jesus Myth position. 39 are alive and 31 are dead:

Living:
1) G. A. Wells, 2) Robert M. Price, 3) Thomas L. Thompson, 4) Timothy Freke, 5) Peter Gandy, 6) Herman Detering, 7) Alvar Ellegard*, 8) Darrell Doughty, 9) Frank Zindler, 10) Michael Turton, 11) Luigi Cascioli, 12) Michel Onfray, 13) Francesco Carotta, 14) Tom Harpur, 15) Hal Childs, 16), Herbert Cutner, 17) Michael O. Wise, 18) Burton Mack*, 19) Jan Sammer, 20) Arthur M. Rothstein, 21) Michael Martin, 22 D.M. Murdock (AKA Acharya S.) 23) Richard Carrier, 24) Earl Doherty, 25) Joseph Atwill, 26) Ken Humphreys, 27) Harold Liedner, 28) Zane Winter, 29) Gary Courtney, 30) Michael Hoffman, 31) Max Rieser, 32) R.G. Price, 33) Barbara G. Walker, 34) C. Dennis McKinsey, 35) Lawrence Dalton, 36) Shirley Strutton Dalton, 37) Hayyim ben Yehoshua, 38) Brian Flemming, 39) Jay Raskin

Not Living:
1) Georg Morris Cohen Brandes, 2) John (J.M.) Robertson 3) Bertrand Russell, 4) Joseph McCabe 5) Livio C. Stecchini, 6) Thomas Whittaker, 7) John E. Remsburg, 8) Arthur Drews, 9) P. L. Couchoud, 10) John Allegro, 11) van den Bergh van Eysinga, 12) Robert Taylor, 13) Joseph Wheless, 14) Peter Jensen, 15) Gordon Rylands, 16) Guy Fau, 17) Mangasar Mugurditch Mangasarian, 18) Alvin Boyd Kuhn, 19) John E. Remsburg, 20) Marshall J. Gauvin, 21) J.G. Jackson, 22) William Benjamin Smith, 23) S.G.F. Brandon*, 24) Marcel Simon*, 25) Cita Rom Goel, 26) Salomon Reinach, 27) Albert Bayet, 28) M.F.A. Aulard, 29) Prosper Alfaric 30) Yosef ben-Jochannan, 31) Alan Dundes

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
Think really hard, who is the more respectable historian richard carrier or bart ehrman?
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:06 PM   #152
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
Because most of you people are anti religious atheists, who hate religion, and would love nothing more then to take the most radical postion on the subject.
I would like christianity to be true. I would need God to explain a lot better some things from the OT.
I do not wish that christianity is true so much that I pretend to believe something that I cannot or that I sort of forget lots of things that make it difficult for me to say "I believe".

I would like to live forever with friendly people and with a loving god who cares for those under him. I would not mind obeying sensible laws and would appreciate sensible laws.

However, sadly I do not think that this will happen.
As I am nearly 60 years old this is a bit sad for me but then I think, well everyone else that has ever existed is going to extinction so why should I complain.

This is a very strange world we live in.
Transient is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:09 PM   #153
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

To sum up, modern critical methods fail to support the Christ myth theory. It has 'again and again been answered and annihilated by first rank scholars.' In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary." - Michael Grant, Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels (Scribner, 1995).
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:10 PM   #154
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East of ginger trees
Posts: 12,637
Default

So, instead of actually answering any of our points, you retreat once more into posting a quote from some historian claiming the case is closed, without any further evidence to back it up.

I'm done here.
Barefoot Bree is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:12 PM   #155
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

Your done because there isn't anything you can say.
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:12 PM   #156
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
To sum up, modern critical methods fail to support the Christ myth theory. It has 'again and again been answered and annihilated by first rank scholars.' In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary." - Michael Grant, Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels (Scribner, 1995).
This quote right here is EXACTLY what is wrong with your entire spiel in this thread.

It is a meaningless appeal to authority that says nothing about the topic.
Ktotwf is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:12 PM   #157
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
Because most of you people are anti religious atheists, who hate religion, and would love nothing more then to take the most radical postion on the subject.
Why do you accuse most people here of hatred of religion instead of providing the evidence or sources of antiquity that can support your position?

The expert opinion of a scholar is not evidence or a source of antiquity of Jesus.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:13 PM   #158
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

The Christ myth theory has again and again been answered. That is fact
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:14 PM   #159
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,936
Default

The Theory of Evolution has been "answered" again and again. That doesn't mean the answer was good, or that it changed anything.
Ktotwf is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:34 PM   #160
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

Historians and scholars regard the nonexistence hypothesis effectively refuted. Thats another fact.
TimBowe is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.