![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
|
![]()
Words have meaning.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Champaign, IL or Boston, MA
Posts: 6,360
|
![]()
THIS STATEMENT CAN BE ARGUED.
![]() Sorry if something along these lines has been mentioned. edit: I see it has. How 'bout: 0+1=1 |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Admin Consensus Is That Terriers are O.K.
Posts: 1,608
|
![]() Quote:
Glox Troquisito Frocola Spoltzio, Klang Grooie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Admin Consensus Is That Terriers are O.K.
Posts: 1,608
|
![]() Quote:
I hate math, yo. I suck so bad at math, I'd need a golden calculator to divide (to divide) the time it takes to realize, that real guys go for real down-to-Mars girls. Yeah. So is there anyone here who can argue that 0+1 does not = 1? If so, I would very much appreciate it. From the Jungles of An "Outside-The-Box" Mathematics Tutor, Kang Louie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Admin Consensus Is That Terriers are O.K.
Posts: 1,608
|
![]()
Perhaps it can be done like this:
Quote:
0+1 equals 1-0." Word. From the Junlges of a Different Equation, Kang Louie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Admin Consensus Is That Terriers are O.K.
Posts: 1,608
|
![]()
And perhaps it can be done like this:
Perhaps your "1" to the left of the = sign is actually .999999999999 X 10 to the gazillianth power. Just rounded up and stuff -- as would be spacially prudent. And yet, your "1" to the right of the sign is the real deal type of 1 -- the real shebang, el numero uno -- a thoroughbred "1." Them thangs ain't equal no more, though they would, in all practical cases, remain the same as how you first presented them: 1=1. Took me 3 posts to argue that crap, because I suck so bad at math. But still, it was argued. Right? So. If Kangy has 3 posts, and Sally takes one post away -- then gives two posts back; and, if Billy calls "BULLSHIT" on one of the two new posts, then sends another one to ~Elsewhere~ -- then how many more posts before someone will post "something in this world that can not be argued?" From the Jungles of Low S.A.T. Scores, Kang Louie |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West London
Posts: 2,337
|
![]()
Water is wet! Now argue dammit!
I'm off to bed, so I'll catch up with you all later. Ciao H |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 5,441
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisneyland
Posts: 854
|
![]() Quote:
:-D Anna |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,665
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|