FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2012, 08:01 PM   #61
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
why use a jewish peasant as a roman god?
Wasn't he first of all a god for the Gentiles?

Still, a construct.
MrMacSon is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:02 PM   #62
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by James The Least View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
I havnt seen a a myther yet produce a replacement hypothesis for why romans deified a peasant, when they have a track record of only deifying emporers ect ect.
Because the peasant only existed in their minds, as a theological construct.
heres where all mythers fail, WHY?

why use a jewish peasant as a roman god?
It's an inane question that falls over its own presuppositions.

FFS, start with the evidence which points to a very much lower class cult spread throughout Greek speaking communities around the Mediterranean (including Rome). A Roman god indeed?!

The mythicist position fails through lack of evidence. Sound familiar?
spin is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:04 PM   #63
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Paul never met a Jesus....
So, did he NOT get the name Jesus from someone else??

Once you admit that Paul never met Jesus then there are TWO fundamental ways he could have gotten the name Jesus and information about the character.

Either orally or by written sources ....
or, the Pauline content could have been borrowed and altered to align with the canonical gospel stories as they were being written, collated, or re-written.

or, the Pauline content could have been written fully to align with the canonical stores
Or Paul was responsible for the name of his figure who represents and brings salvation. Jesus = Yah saves.
spin is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:42 PM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Or Paul was responsible for the name of his figure who represents and brings salvation. Jesus
Well Paul does say that he heard this name spoken directly from heaven, -or in his head (Acts 26:15, 22:8, 9:5 _ 2Cr 12:2)
Anyone that was familiar with the Hebrew OT texts could easily derive that this should or would be the messiahs name.

Wouldn't take any actual vision, just being familiar with Hebrew, or someone who had pointed out these OT texts,
and voila! a 'I had a vision!' moment.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:51 PM   #65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Or Paul was responsible for the name of his figure who represents and brings salvation. Jesus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Well Paul does say that he heard this name spoken directly from heaven ... voila! a 'I had a vision!' moment.
So the story goes. Perhaps there never was a 'Paul', or a Peter, or an Adam, or a Mohammed, or any other theologically-proposed character?
MrMacSon is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:52 PM   #66
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
FFS, start with the evidence which points to a very much lower class cult spread throughout Greek speaking communities around the Mediterranean (including Rome). A Roman god indeed?!
the movement failed quickly in judaism to a number of factors, before it became a gentile/roman shall I say hellenistic version of judaism and spread through the roman empire that paul traveled. The lower class you speak of failed within judaism due to its leaders [the real apostles] being illiterate and only relied on oral tradition.

Not getting the word out like paul did focusing on capitol's and city centers killed the real apostles movement. the movement wasnt well accepted in judaism to begin with. this low class movement would have went no where had paul not taken it.

Paul took the religion, recorded his own hellenistic version of this deity and hit the road with it preaching to romans and trying to steal god-fearers from synagogues.

a pine tree grew from a small nut, as did the jesus movement into a jewish roman deity.

you want evidence, I call saul to the stand for starting the movement in a way that worked.




I had a thought about paul persecuting the sect, what he spends 3 years chasing down the sect leaders. The movement was so small, a good headhunter could get all the apostles of thi ssmall movement in that time, and then what?? all of a sudden after the real apostles are dead, a roman version is born through saul, saying pay your taxes to romans.


I dont put stock in my mythology of saul, but it beats what mythers excuse's are.


but you didnt answer the question, why a peasant jew with unique parables??
outhouse is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:56 PM   #67
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
why use a jewish peasant as a roman god?
Wasn't he first of all a god for the Gentiles?

Still, a construct.
gentiles = non jew, that pretty much left mostly romans or roman citizens.



Not originally he was not for gentiles at all. he was strickly a jewish deity within the real apostles
outhouse is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:02 PM   #68
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
or, the Pauline content could have been borrowed and altered to align with the canonical gospel stories as they were being written, collated, or re-written.

or, the Pauline content could have been written fully to align with the canonical stores
I cannot assume any other story for the Pauline character except what is written.

We have the Canon and the Pauline character was the LAST of the Apostles. The Pauline writer even claimed OVER 500 people was visited by the resurrected Jesus BEFORE him.

1 Cor. 15
Quote:
3For I delivered unto you first of all that which Ialso received , how that Christ diedfor our sins according to the scriptures;4And that he was buried , and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep . 7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.8And last of all he was seen of me...
Over 500 people, the Apostles, James, Cephas and the Twelve knew that according to the Scriptures Jesus died for our sins, was buried and resurrected BEFORE Paul based on the very Pauline writer.

If people want to claim Paul was first to preach Jesus then they MUST, MUST provide the source and NOT their imagination.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:04 PM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
or, the Pauline content could have been borrowed and altered to align with the canonical gospel stories as they were being written, collated, or re-written.

or, the Pauline content could have been written fully to align with the canonical stores
Or Paul was responsible for the name of his figure who represents and brings salvation. Jesus = Yah saves.


yeshua was a common name as mike, I like philo's refference better.
outhouse is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:42 PM   #70
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Or Paul was responsible for the name of his figure who represents and brings salvation. Jesus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Well Paul does say that he heard this name spoken directly from heaven ... voila! a 'I had a vision!' moment.
So the story goes. Perhaps there never was a 'Paul', or a Peter, or an Adam, or a Mohammed, or any other theologically-proposed character?
The wingnut response.

Perhaps there never was a 'Josephus' or a 'Lucian of Samosata' or 'Petronius' or whatever you like.
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.