FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2005, 01:50 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

The first difficulty in changing the date is the process of changing our records which would cost billions of dollars, given the variety of systems that base themselves on the Julian-Gregorian calendar and Exiguus' era. The second difficulty is picking a better date that is well-established and culture-neutral. Any particular man is out of the question. In honor of the Unix computer internal clock, I would pick 1 Jan 1970. I would also fix the numbering from ordinal (year 1 means "first year") to cardinal (year 0 is 1970, the "first year"). Years before 1970 would be negative numbers, such as –2013 for the year that Caesar died. This would have the other positive benefit of preventing whines about how the first century isn't over until +101, as the last day of the first century is 31 Dec 99.

kind thoughts,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-02-2005, 06:09 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

You should try :

http://www.kokogiak.com/frc/default.asp

It is a historical attempt, and it failed.

But there is another related point. Christmas is a legal holiday, and the name "Christ" is inside the word... I met recently a moslem (man) who told me : "I don't like the idea of a christian holiday, since in France, there is no Aïd El Kebir, for instance". My answer was : "My feeling is that Christmas is a christian day only for those who want to go to church and attend the mass, but nobody is compelled. My interpretation is that December 25th is the (non-religious) children's day". Here, we agreed.
Huon is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 06:12 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 5,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon
But there is another related point. Christmas is a legal holiday, and the name "Christ" is inside the word... I met recently a moslem (man) who told me : "I don't like the idea of a christian holiday, since in France, there is no Aïd El Kebir, for instance". My answer was : "My feeling is that Christmas is a christian day only for those who want to go to church and attend the mass, but nobody is compelled. My interpretation is that December 25th is the (non-religious) children's day". Here, we agreed.
You should also point out that the French word for Christmas (Noël) doesn't contain any reference to Christ.
French Prometheus is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 07:37 AM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
Default

Would somebody please make an annoucement that CE does not stand for "Christian Era"?
Aspirin99 is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 08:18 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspirin99
Would somebody please make an annoucement that CE does not stand for "Christian Era"?
It won't be me. As far as I know, the exact origins of "CE" are obscure.

kind thoughts,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-04-2005, 08:22 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
It won't be me. As far as I know, the exact origins of "CE" are obscure.

kind thoughts,
Peter Kirby

Really? Well, I learn something new everyday.
Aspirin99 is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 10:28 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

I understand that CE is "Common Era", of course common era in Christian countries, but also in India, China, Japan, and perhaps elsewhere.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era
Huon is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 11:40 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

And if you don't like the ambiguity of CE, you could use an old formula "Vulgar Era" instead of CE !
Huon is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 12:27 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Any change is going to face problems. In fact, change may be impossible. At least that's what one Christian theist implied on another thread when he said--as proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ--that:

"time itself has been rearranged around his birth (AD, BC)"
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 09-04-2005, 12:55 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Some people say that Jesus was born in 4 BC (before Christ), because Dyonisius Exiguus made a computation error...

So Julius Caesar was born in 4 before Julius Caesar.
Huon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.