FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-05-2009, 05:35 PM   #91
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The gospels were not written until any eyewitnesses from Bethlehem were long dead, so I doubt aa5874's explanation.

A much stronger indication of the mythical nature of the gospels is the so called "Sea of Galilee," otherwise known as Lake Kinneret. It is just a lake, not large enough to support a storm that would frighten the disciples or require the attention of a god walking on water.
It is not necessary for all eyewitnesses to be alive to deduce that Jesus never lived in Bethlehem. It is not necessary for there to be eyewitnesses alive to deduce that Abraham Lincoln, a former president of the USA, did not live in Jamaica in the Caribbean while he was President.

There are lots of people who know where Abraham Lincoln lived who have never seen him alive or dead.

On the other hand, people saw Jesus alive after he was suppoed to be dead. Paul and over 500 people even, though outside the Church, no-one did write about him alive and in Nazareth.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 06:29 PM   #92
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn10 View Post
1. MJ
2. HJ
A. Just a man
B. a prophet
C. Divine
I. Teachings/actions accurately recorded in the bible
II. Teachings/actions corrupted as recorded in the bible
Hi Donn10,

Count me as 1, C, II. I do not see any of these in conflict.

When I first came to the board I was a garden variety atheist who (never thought about it - so...) assumed that Jesus existed in history. After a while here and doing some reading I have moved into the Myth camp - predominantly because of the retroactive Biblical validation of divinity and ahistorical myth-making used in the Gospels. I see this as a device necessary to win converts among 1st/2nd century audience, not a way to document an individual.

Unlike many other atheists, I do think the question is extremely important for moving society along.


Gregg
gdeering is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 06:40 PM   #93
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer View Post
Of course it has no explanatory power.
Then I can see no value for you in holding it.
Neither do I. Nor do I see any value in not holding it. It's really not an important enough issue for me to put much care into either way. Whether Jesus was a real person or a fake person is fairly moot in regards to how Christianity was built around the story of the person. It being based on a template from a real person with the mystical shit added in seems more sensible to me than being wholey fabricated, but it doesn't matter in any essential manner one way or the other.
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 06:51 PM   #94
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

A much stronger indication of the mythical nature of the gospels is the so called "Sea of Galilee," otherwise known as Lake Kinneret. It is just a lake, not large enough to support a storm that would frighten the disciples .
I've been in scary storms on much smaller lakes. What is your source for the complete absence of scary storms?

Peter.
Petergdi is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 08:52 PM   #95
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petergdi View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

A much stronger indication of the mythical nature of the gospels is the so called "Sea of Galilee," otherwise known as Lake Kinneret. It is just a lake, not large enough to support a storm that would frighten the disciples .
I've been in scary storms on much smaller lakes. What is your source for the complete absence of scary storms?

Peter.
It is quite a large lake in a valley surrounded by mountains and is known (even in modern times) to sport sudden storms. There is a boat there (the Jesus boat) in a museum managed by a kibbutz on the lake belevied to be from the time of Christ (the boat, not the kibbutz). I suspect if you get in that small boat in the Lake in a storm, you will be frightened to death. You can check a local weather report to verify whether there are storms on the lake.

A relatively shallow lake is going to have a more violent reaction to the wind that a deeper one.

http://www.tripwolf.com/en/guide/sho...Sea-of-Galilee
sschlichter is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 09:48 PM   #96
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
It is quite a large lake in a valley surrounded by mountains and is known (even in modern times) to sport sudden storms.
I don't think the kind of storm they have frequently would be likely to seriously frighten people who have fished on the lake for their livelihood. It seems to me that it would have to be rather worse than normal. The implied claim by Toto that there are never scary storms on Lake Kinneret seems to me to require more than assertion.

Peter.
Petergdi is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 11:46 PM   #97
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea View Post

If Jesus was being made up to suffer an ignominious death and to fit prophecies in Isaiah 53, it would have made more sense to have him die of some horrible disease. A leper Messiah perhaps. Heck, it would have been an impressive visual scene, spiritual metaphor, and reference to Moses to show his skin healthy after resurrection.
The crucifixion of Jesus was partly fabricated from the Psalms. The authors of the JESUS stories appear to have used Hebrew Scripture instead of historical sources.

The last words of Jesus on the cross as found in gMatthew and gMark can be found in Psalms 22.1. See Matthew 27.46 and Mark 15.34.

The last words of Jesus on the cross as found in Luke23.46 can be found in Psalms 31.5

The parting of his garments can be found in Psalms 22.18 and Matthew 27.35, Mark 15.24, and John 19.24.

The use of false witnesses against Jesus can be found in PSALMS 27.12 and Matthew 26.60.

The words of Pilate where he claimed to be innocent of the blood of Jesus can be found in Psalms 26.6 and Matthew 27.24.

It is clear that the fabricators of Jesus did not rely on historical accounts but merely used Hebrew Scripture to manufacture their Jesus.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 09-06-2009, 01:32 AM   #98
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Then I can see no value for you in holding it.
Neither do I. Nor do I see any value in not holding it. It's really not an important enough issue for me to put much care into either way. Whether Jesus was a real person or a fake person is fairly moot in regards to how Christianity was built around the story of the person. It being based on a template from a real person with the mystical shit added in seems more sensible to me than being wholey fabricated, but it doesn't matter in any essential manner one way or the other.
OK, so you stridently hold onto guesswork and don't have anything to offer beside naked opinion in trying to understand the birth of christianity. This certainly helps us get closer to why Paul was so interested in people's salvation, doesn't it?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-06-2009, 07:09 AM   #99
Donn10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gdeering View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn10 View Post
1. MJ
2. HJ
A. Just a man
B. a prophet
C. Divine
I. Teachings/actions accurately recorded in the bible
II. Teachings/actions corrupted as recorded in the bible
Hi Donn10,

Count me as 1, C, II. I do not see any of these in conflict.

When I first came to the board I was a garden variety atheist who (never thought about it - so...) assumed that Jesus existed in history. After a while here and doing some reading I have moved into the Myth camp - predominantly because of the retroactive Biblical validation of divinity and ahistorical myth-making used in the Gospels. I see this as a device necessary to win converts among 1st/2nd century audience, not a way to document an individual.

Unlike many other atheists, I do think the question is extremely important for moving society along.


Gregg
It seems odd for an atheist to think something was divine. Could you elaborate?
 
Old 09-06-2009, 09:53 AM   #100
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn10 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdeering View Post

Hi Donn10,

Count me as 1, C, II. I do not see any of these in conflict.
It seems odd for an atheist to think something was divine. Could you elaborate?
Sure, simple: Within the Christian myth-cycle of Jesus he is presented as divine, though manifest in the flesh etc......

Secondly - whatever the earliest conceptions of this divine Jesus were, they were corrupted and modified in ways we know and in ways people are trying to understand from the crumbs available.


Gregg
gdeering is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.