Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-06-2005, 06:37 PM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
10-06-2005, 06:38 PM | #12 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Chris |
||||
10-06-2005, 08:17 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
|
Quote:
By way of perhaps the best example, few critical scholars (as opposed to apologists) in the field of NT studies are more conservative in their positions than the late Fr. Raymond Brown. Yet Brown, if inadvertantly, has probably done more to forward the idea that the Passion narrative is wholesale fiction than any other scholar, living or dead. There is no such thing as a modern commentary or analysis of the Passion that is not directly or indirectly dependent on Brown's monumental two volume work, The Death of the Messiah. As an ironic testament to its influence, the dependence frequently goes uncited--Brown's readings are so undeniably correct that, once pointed out, it becomes ludicrous to suggest that there is any other apt reading, and so they are quickly chalked up to some sort of common knowledge. Yet when one points out the similarity between Judas Iscariot and Judah of Technicolor Dream Coat fame, or reflects on the parallel of the only two hanged individuals (Iscariot and Absalom) in Jewish literature both being traitors, and so on, it is never suggested that it needs to be subjected to a more critical eye because of Brown's Catholic background. Right is right, regardless of who says it. Regards, Rick Sumner |
|
10-06-2005, 09:00 PM | #14 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|