Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-08-2004, 10:31 AM | #331 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2004, 10:31 AM | #332 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_name_of_God_in_Judaism As to the Documentary Hypothesis: According to the Documentary Hypothesis, Gen 1-2:3 is from the "P" (the Priestly source) which provided the first chapter of Genesis, and which used El or Elohim to refer to God until Exodus 3. Gen 2-3 (and much of the rest of Genesis) is from the "J" (Jahwist or Jerusalem source) which used YHWH to refer to God. The two separate myths were later combined into the book we now call "Genesis", along with other stories from the various sources (there were four, J, E (Elohist, or Ephraimic, which used "El" until Exodus), P (Priestly, which used "YHWH") and D (Deuteronomist, which used "YHWH"). See the following link: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rs/2/Judaism/jepd.html or, better yet, see Who Wrote the Bible? by Richard Friedman. This link provides an analysis of the Flood account according to the Documentary Hypothesis: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rs/2/Judaism/jp-flood.html |
|
06-08-2004, 10:33 AM | #333 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
|
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2004, 10:35 AM | #334 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2004, 10:35 AM | #335 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
In any case, the Documentary Hypothesis fits what we see in the Torah quite nicely. It's a good explanation for the various conflicts and contradictions that are seen there. You really should read the material I provided above and make up your own mind. It's convinced me that the Documentary Hypothesis is correct. |
|
06-08-2004, 10:37 AM | #336 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2004, 10:37 AM | #337 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2004, 10:39 AM | #338 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
And you? You are saying that Hitler, should he have had accepted Christ (and it doesn't matter when), is going to heaven, too. And isn't by accepting Christ everything forgiven? So what is the point in following the law etc? |
|
06-08-2004, 10:40 AM | #339 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
As to Jehovah, from the Wikipedia link I provided above: Quote:
|
||
06-08-2004, 10:43 AM | #340 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,294
|
Quote:
It seems you're just getting your panties in a wad because we refuse to accept your arguments which are ALL based upon "because the Bible says so and the Bible is the Word of God therefore nothing can possibly ever prove me wrong because I use the Bible!" If you think you can "win" an argument here by invoking your holy book as the Ultimate Truth, then perhaps you need to seriously reconsider why you're here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|