TasManOfGod

forum staff level 2 in thread #1(mod hat on ): "you are debating -post removed -demerit point - thread closed"
forum staff level 3 in thread #2 (no mod hat): "answer these questions 1 2 3....."
me in thread 2 : "sorry I can't debate "
forum staff level 1 in threatening PM : <edited for privacy violation>
And these people want to answer about staff actions and rule interpretations

flesh99

<edited to remove private information--Alethias>

hopper

Thanks, ravsie et al. I've done all required of me of my Biblical ethics thus far, but the process continues. For those who may wish to know, the matter involves more nonsense from Blaster (I'ddie4him) and one of those 'silent but not so silent as they may think' conspiracies filled with unsubstatiated accusations and jumps to judgment as CF moderator actions always seem to start. I won't name others involved at this point, especially since there are real issues of physical mental incapacity of someone (not Blaster) at the heart of the attack. Ravsie knows my penchant for being a pack rat of catalogued ancient CF information. If only they knew the transcripts that are vailable for defensive and offensive use. Surely CF Staff is at least marginally aware of the limits of site disclaimers?

This time the moderators have gone way too far and have put the whole site in considerable legal jeopady, not that they don't do that on a regular basis.

It all seems rather <insert words or characterizations allowed per IIDB rules here> to me, but it's as the conspirators (some of whom have already left CF and are actually trying to harm the site from another base) have designed.

Thanks for your prayers and well wishes.

-hopper

flesh99

I guess it's obvious that Tas is allowed to continue <edit> about us here. Oh well I tried. That's all I can do. I can find numerous posts of contacts and warnings here which are covered by the rules and are still up. I guess posts in defense are just not allowed. I don't know why I even bothered.

Straight_Shooter

Flesh on a better note your defense the other day of using ad hom and logical fallacy and the such as not being a rule violation was ingenious, and I thank you for it.

flesh99

Fat lot of good it's likely to do though...

flesh99

So how about it Tas? How aboute permission to disprove the <edit> you have leveled against me and other staff? You obviously didn't like me posting the PMs that disproved so I have little hope you will allow it. If you do not I am going to request you edit your post for posting unprovable <edit>.

Blaster

Pan out to Mr. Rogers Neighborhood.
Can we say Persecution complex children ??

Blaster

Hey hopper,

How about instead of posting nasty remarks about me, You actually try to defend a quote I have from you concerning this issue. It did not come from a mentally incapactitated individual either.

<deleted PM>

Blaster

Didn't stop you from doing slandering Staff at CF now did it ??