Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-27-2012, 05:08 AM | #21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
OK, Sheshbazzer - perhaps I’ll help Adam out....
Once one takes away all the magic stuff from the gospel story and tries to create a Jesus figure out of what is left over, one will have to face the rather disconcerting reality of history. And it’s history that demonstrates not one flesh and blood figure that could possibly reflect some of these left over, non-magic, elements of the gospel JC - but TWO such historical figures, ie the gospel JC figure is a composite figure not a flesh and blood figure. Two historical figures living in different time frames. Below is a chart using history and elements of the gospel JC story. Yes, one can debate what relevance the gospel writers found in these two historical figures - and perhaps that is where progress in searching for early Christian origins can be found. History and it's interpretation, it's retelling as 'salvation history', or symbolic or philosophical ideas. A gospel pseudo-history taking it's cue from history. Or as much history as one can find within the writing of Josephus.......
For additional thoughts on Philip the Tetrarch - an old thread: http://www.freeratio.org/showthread.php?t=289319 Is Agrippa II the son of Philip the Tetrarch ? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01-27-2012, 08:30 AM | #22 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
|
Quote:
|
|
01-27-2012, 11:12 AM | #23 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
|
||
01-27-2012, 03:49 PM | #24 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Adam professes that he can identify these specific verses as penned in the Gospels, and also exactly identify which of the apostles (or Nicodemus) was the writer of each of these verses or sections of text. He has proven very facile at providing long lists of verse numbers which he claims to back up his contentions, and claims that there is a credible historical story that can be recovered from these actual verses, without accepting or including any of the Gospel stories supernatural or miracle elements, this is what he has chosen to designate as being his "Gospel According to the Atheists". This Gospel that Adam is professing to exist or to be able to recover would be quite different than that 'free form' account given in 'The Gospel of Abe', because the very argument being made by Adam in his threads is that these particular verses and portions of text are the accurate eyewitness accounts penned by the apostles (and Nicodemus) that need to be accepted as historical accounts even by atheists and non-believers. His composition therefore would need to incorporate these exact verses and sections more or less word for word as his alleged eyewitnesses reported them. The challenge for Adam is to produce a coherent and readable Gospel narrative employing only those elements that can be found within the existing texts- free of any references to Josephus or elements drawn from any latter church writings. He alleges there is a "Gospel which is According to the Atheists" and I am asking him nothing more than to produce such a Gospel. |
||
01-27-2012, 09:00 PM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dixon CA
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
The raw text from Nicodemus, my modification of Teeple’s G, runs as follows: John 3 (in the main); 4:20-24; most of 5:17-47; 6:26-51, 58-65; most of 7:5-52; 8:12-57; most of 9 & 10, but not 9:1-2, 6-7, 13-17, 24-28; 11:1, 9-10, 16; 12:23-50; 13:16, 20; Ch. 14-17. (after correcting some typos). It's not necessarily completely free of miracles, but enough so for our purposes here. |
|
01-27-2012, 10:18 PM | #26 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Not even Church writers or apologetic sources of antiquity ever claimed Nicodemus wrote anything. You don't know how the NT Canon came to be written and who wrote them. Nicodemus WROTE Nothing. You INVENTED Nicodemus as a writer. |
||
01-27-2012, 10:19 PM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
I don't need another list of verse numbers. And "(in the main)__ 'most of',__ 'most of',__ 'most of", just don't cut it, What are you leaving out??? And how in the hell do you expect us to know? If your tale is an eyewitness report you should be able to write it out in an easily readable format. Arrange it in any manner you chose, leave out whatever you think needs left out, just make it make sense. Why not simply provide us with the first dozen verses of this alleged 'eyewitness' account? Shouldn't take up half of the space of one of your longer posts here. Is your reticence to do so, because you cannot? Have you been trying it, and finding out for yourself that it comes out deficient? Inquiring minds want to know, What is your hold up? . |
|
01-27-2012, 11:40 PM | #28 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dixon CA
Posts: 1,150
|
Why should I pretend to know more than I know? The stylistic markers within the Johannine Discourses are not so clear as those demarkating them from the other sources and redactions within gJohn. I don't accept the Discourses as all of one piece, but Teeple's critique assigns too much to an Editor, and I settle for something in-between. The boundaries do not affect how much supernaturalism is or isn't in the earliest strata (except the whole concept underlying John 6 ). What is clear is that a great part of the Discourses were gathered as evidence against Jesus and thus had to be while he was not yet sentenced. Of course that makes problematic how much we can trust what Jesus is quoted as saying. But it's eyewitness testimony, no matter how slanted.
|
01-27-2012, 11:51 PM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
|
|
01-27-2012, 11:57 PM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
|
"the" Bible
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|