Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-15-2004, 02:07 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,179
|
I know someone else famously declared that god must have an inordinate fondness for beetles but, with the creationists going on about rapid devolution via micro-evolution post-fall and post-flood (ie the only kind of mutations and changes they will accept being negative because they are out of their tiny little minds with the rapture), it would be more "logical" to them that god really hates beetles and cursed them more or did little to prevent their "decline" into speciation.
That was all one sentence. |
03-15-2004, 03:05 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Our eyes serve us quite well enough, I'd guess, and that's really all evolution does; make do with a minium of fuss. If, someday down the road we'd need better vision to get our supper, it would evolve it from what we have.
The fat, little opossum that shares my digs has excellent hearing and a sense of smell that can only be described as superb. But his vision is barely good enough to keep him from bumping into trees as he makes his nightly rounds. That's all he needs, and his species is highly successful; indeed, one of the few, small mammals in the US that is actually expanding it's population and range. Might the 'possum's eyesight improve? Unlikely, I'd think, unless the species took on a whole, different lifestyle. Might ours evolve? Probably not because, like the opossum, we compensate; they with nose and ears and ourselves with optic devices. doov |
03-15-2004, 05:41 AM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Giving the posting history of Danpech (two posts yesterday after a long, long time and all the former posts in the more philosphical forums), I hope he actually comes back to answer some of the posts here.
|
03-15-2004, 05:45 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,330
|
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2004, 07:28 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,179
|
You seem to be missing the point that the cells could be the right way up while still being next to the blood vessels (and nerves). It is like saying that someone has to walk on their hands in order to be in contact with the ground rather than flying, when they would actually do better on their feet.
|
03-15-2004, 08:13 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Fernando Valley, CA
Posts: 2,627
|
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2004, 10:03 AM | #17 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sodom. or Gomorrah
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
Quote:
DG |
||
03-15-2004, 10:33 AM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Back home near Philly!
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
His optomotrist told him that these holes aren't really caused by anything in particular. The only reason he found out early was because he was scheduled to have LASIK done to improve his supposedly "perfected design" of vision, and was then told they couldn't perform the surgery due to this complication. Quote:
|
||
03-16-2004, 01:36 AM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 52.35412N 4.90495E
Posts: 1,253
|
Quote:
Ok enough whining. Can I sue God for malpractice? |
|
03-16-2004, 01:45 AM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|