![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#71 | |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
That ten legion site looks like it's aimed at people who want something more colorful than civil war reenactment but more manly than the Renaissance Faire.
For the about page: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
DCH
I guess the question is how different do you imagine a tenth legion standard would look from a stick with a flag with an X on it. I doubt there was much originality. |
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
The tenth legion was at Carrhae at the beginning of the Common Era:
http://books.google.com/books?id=8kL...ion%22&f=false That's pretty solid circumstantial evidence don't you think? |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
No one knows when the Legio X was first organized
I think the point is that the legion was organized c. 41 BCE. They apparently had winter residence at Carrhae. I don't see the difficulty in accepting a coin from 19 BCE from Carrhae with their insignia on it |
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Another interesting X coin associated with the legion
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Is it an eagle or is it a cross? More coins from Parthia:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Another image of the legio x ensign
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Another image:
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Has it been said often enough that a cross shaped like a tau isn't chiasmic (i.e. it is not a 'cross' or 'cross-shaped'):
![]() Just because our surviving copies of Barnabas say that the cross looked like a tau, Clement's text of the same letter did not. Besides which it is contradicted by ALL the early witnesses who say the cross was a chiasma. I think the original text of Barnabas somehow 'knew' that the tau went back to a Semitic letter that was cross-shaped (or liked like an X). But how do you prove that? |
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle east
Posts: 829
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|