FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2008, 12:00 PM   #181
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: America?
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demon View Post
Anyone else notice how dlb has conveniently chosen to retreat from the other thread concerning his so-called "atheist suicide bombers"?
Shit! I thought this was the "atheist suicide bomber" thread! It's getting hard to tell which thread is which

Well he's completely retreated from me, which is good in a way. The por lil' fella's getting it from all sides, and I really feel he's even more confused then when I first started attacking him.

I'm sorry dr. lazer blast, can we still be friends?><
Exciter is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 12:07 PM   #182
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noe Sandoval View Post

Ignoring that, I'm still curious as to how many people were actually executed by communist countries due to their religion.
Is there any information that verifies that this occurred?
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 12:36 PM   #183
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

Let us now go patiently through each of dr lazers blasts various statements one by one:

In post nr 139 in this topic I wrote the following after looking over his list of 20th century mass murderers:

Quote:
Sir Reginald Fleming Johnston (1874–1938) was a Scottish academic, diplomat and pedagogue and the tutor of Puyi, the last emperor of China, and later appointed as commissioner of British-held Weihaiwei. Was he ever a communist, mass-murdering dictator somewhere? No. He was a civil servant of the British Empire.
To which he answered in post 142:

Quote:
I guess thenetian fails to once again see the facts that flemming was in the cabnit when the peoples republic of china got started in 1912.
To which I replied in post 146:

Quote:
Oh, this is rich! The Peoples Republic of China started in 1949! You need to provide evidence that he was in said cabinet, or else it is just another assertion. You need to provide evidence that he was responsible for genocide or else it is just another assertion. You need to provide evidence that he was a communist or else it is just another assertion. In short, you're not getting any assertions past me without evidence to back it up.
This prompted the following reply:
Quote:
thenetian once again doesn't seem to know the facts. From his own link people, the peoples republic of china was established 1912, it was relocated to taiwan in 1949. Check thenetians link and look on the right side and you will see where thenetian forgot to actually do the research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China

- Republic established January 1, 1912
- Relocated to Taiwan December 7, 1949

here is more proof that thenetian just isn't looking at the facts.


Quote:
The establishment of Republican China developed out of the Wuchang Uprising against the Qing on October 10, 1911. The Republic of China was established on January 1, 1912, with Dr. Sun Yat-sen as the provisional president.
thenetian seems to be too caught up in oppositional thinking to see the facts
Realizing that dlb was probably mistaking PRC for RoC, I replied the following in post 165:

Quote:
Dr lazer blast seems to be too caught up in his obfuscations to notice that my link actually points to the wikipage on the People's Republic of China which he claimed Sir Reginald Fleming Johnston was a minister of.

So now I take it that you're claiming he was a minister of the Republic of China, instead? Kindly provide evidence for that assertion if so. Also provide evidence that he was a communist and that he was responsible for genocide.
Still unwilling to admit that he can ever be wrong about anything, dr lazer blast has gone on to reply as follows:

Quote:
Now thenetian attempts to ignore his totally obvious ignorance of historical facts and shift the focus away from his incorrect blatently wrong assertions by setting up strawmen arguments claiming that I said fleming was a minister of the republic of china. I never said that whatsoever. I said he was part of the 'cabinet'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald_Johnston


he was appointed Commissioner at Weihaiwei. He ran the territory until it was returned to the Republic of China on October 1, 1930.

then after the embarrassing factual inaccuracies he asserts he attempts to change the focus by commenting on some bolded questions that I never answered.

What thenetian does not realize is that does little to cover up the blatent factual errors he made and the following strawmen he set up in this post, and the fact that I haven't answered them is not evidence of anything.
From this it is clear that dr lazer blast has now realized that Sir Reginald Fleming Johnston was after all appointed commissioner of Weihavei as I pointed out in my first post.

He still claims that I have made "embarrassing factual inaccuracies" and "blatent factual errors", though. Perhaps he can point them out for me? He also accuses me of "totally obvious ignorance of historical facts ".

Then he tries to shift the focus by pointing out that I said "minister" instead of "member of the cabinet". I actually thought that members of the cabinet and ministers are pretty much the same thing, but I could be wrong. English is only a second language for me, after all. Apologies if that is the case.

It is unclear to me whether dr lazer blast still thinks Sir Reginald Fleming Johnston was part of a chinese cabinet or if he just thinks Johnston was part of some cabinet on Weihaiwei, or if he has now realized that Johnston was simply appointed commissioner of british-held Weihaiwei as I pointed out in my first post.

It is very clear to me that dr lazer blast will never provide evidence that Sir Reginald Fleming Johnston was a mass murderer, for obvious reasons.
thentian is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 12:48 PM   #184
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: charleston sc
Posts: 1,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabine Grant View Post
You seem to be making your "points" as you go and with changing figures as you go. It will be interesting in our exchanges in the new thread for me to quote those modifications as you go.
what new thread are you even talking about? and there has been no adjustment of figures.

Quote:
You quoted in your misspelling a "louie" which had to refer to Saint Louis as an example of a good Christian King. And I debunked your claim. He was not a good king. You made a mention to history based on ignorance.And that after having had the audacity to be demeaning towards GenesisNemesis' knowledge of history.
I misspell a lot of things in my posts so me misspelling louie means little to nothing and has no bearing on anything. Just another example of nitpicking.
when did I ever say he was a good king? nice strawman. You probably have no idea of the context in which I said that. Lets go back sha'll we?
Quote:
In monarchies the king held all of the power. I am not going to name all 1700 of them but a good example would be king louie and just about all of the kings during the middle ages, charlemagne is another good example.
ah yes you were totally ignorant in the context I used. I was talking about kings that held absolute power, a good example would be king louie, considering he was a king that held absolute power, furthermore you were ignorant as to which king louis i was talking about. Looks like you didn't know what you were talking about.

Quote:
I am not aware of atheists wishing upon their fellow human beings who are not conformed to their beliefs, to be tormented eternally. However, I am fully aware of millions of Christians who are longing to be with their Lord in a place named "heaven" while their fellow human beings will "be gnashing their teeth" in a place named hell. If any bloody ideology, Christianity ranks among the worst death wishing ones.
Sabine has enganged in a logical fallacy of a strawman.
Quote:
I am not aware of atheists wishing upon their fellow human beings who are not conformed to their beliefs, to be tormented eternally.
Sabine also seems to be unaware of the fact that I never said anything about atheists wishing upon their fellow human beings to be tormented eternally. The quoted above is totally different from the original point which was 'atheism combined with absolute power is more deadly than christianity combined with absolute power' Sabine seems to be as ignorant of logic and properly addressing arguments as genisis is ignorant of history.
Quote:
Proportionately is not in your vocabulary?
Proportion has nothing to do with anything. 148 million to like 8 million is staggering.

Quote:
Off the top of your head? And may I ask why Clemenceau is listed by you among atheists who committed/ordered genocides? I am thrilled to see more of your revisionism in action. So, what is it you know so well about Clemenceau that our history books in France would not? For example, how would his support to Zola when J'accuse was published be significant of Clemenceau nurturing any thought of elimination, extermination, eradication or even mere discrimination against any group of people based on their ethnicity or religion?
Sabine once again engages in a logical fallacy by setting up strawman. Nowhere have I said the atheists listed committed or ordered genocides.

Quote:
Oh take your time. Considering you will need to do a lot of home work before venturing into references to the period of German history from 1933 to 1945. Specifically Jan 1933 to April 1945. I will also suggest you read Mein kampf considering you could not even identify my quotes as being extracts from Mein Kampf itself as you labeled such quotes as "Table talk". It is possible you suffered of a temporary memory lapse and forgot that Mein Kampf was authored by Adolph Hitler himself. Meaning it cannot be defined as "Table talk". Straight from his mind. No other party saying "he said".
Sabine seems to be dishonestly portraying mein kampf considering several points he has failed to mention.

1. Mein kampf was a book that is very similar to the books written by politicians in our time, and was written coincidentally while hitler was trying to gain power, much like politicians in our day write books during their run for office.

2. mein kampf was written while he was in prison after he failed beer hall putsch, where he tried unsuccessfully to usurp power which suggests that the book was a desperate attempt to get the 'people' on his side to prevent a negative view of him and the nazi party after the beerk hall putch incident.

3. Hitlers private statements contradict a lot of the religious views he wrote about in mein kampf which suggests he was using religion to help promote his racist ideologies.

Quote:
There is no such thing as "hitler the person and thats it". There are very complex dynamics which ultimately were dependent on his mental world and gave birth to the Third Reich.And the very dynamics of the Reich projected the very mental profile of Hitler revealed in Mein Kampf. I will focus on providing evidence that he was not an atheist. And, again, Mein Kampf will be the object of such analysis.
Once again what sabine doesn't seem to understand is the circumstances around which hitler wrote the mein kampf which are explained above. Hitler used various propaganda, lies, charismatic ortary and other tactics to promote control, so using religion to control and promote his ideals are not out of the question.


Quote:
I doubt you understand the meaning of the word "logic" as you used it as liberally as you have used the word "atheism". You are going to have to define your choice of terms in our debate. I will not tolerate any semantic manipulations on your part.
Now sabine has resorted to ad hom attacks and has tried to change the subject while aptly ignoring the fact that her claim has proven wrong with 2 simple sentences.

Quote:
I have provided you with a few quotes directly from Mein Kampf which you could not even identify as such. And do not flatter yourself as to thinking you have debated anyone. I am going to introduce you to what debating means.
considering your tract record of logical fallacies it seems that I will introduce you to what debating means.

Quote:
Is it your perception that people who complete suicide are atheists? I had no idea that was a symptom of atheism. That must be one of the most inane definitions of atheism I have ever seen. You should have added Rev Jim Jones in your list of atheists.
another strawman fallacy while also ignoring the fact that commiting suicide is a sin is direct evidence against his religiosity, while I admit it was a poor choice of words for me to say it is proof of his atheism because it is not, but it is evidence against his religiosity which is among the many other things you have ignored.


Quote:
Some folks claim to "see dead people", you seem to be seeing atheists all over the planet. Well, I am not an atheist, but I happen to agree with Richard Carrier. Somehow I have a sense that you will soon tell me that I am an atheist..... like Clemenceau...
Thats great that you agree with richard carrier, however both of you share something in common, that is the lack of proof to support your claim.


Quote:
"it" happens to be direct quotes from Mein Kampf. How is "it" Table Talk? Did Hitler just copy something someone else said he said? You are a funny, funny person.
'it' just happens to be a book similar to the other books politicians make that use propaganda and lies to sway people to their cause.

Quote:
My quotes were from Mein Kampf. By now I have affirmed it to you so many times that I expect there will be no further misunderstanding on your part about the author of what I have quoted. But just in case : that was from Hitler's "mouth" himself. So you are going to have to deal with it.
You are just going to have to deal with the fact that this book was written after a failed attempt to usurp power, while in jail, in a desperate attempt to keep a good public image of him and the nazi group alive.'
Quote:
Non. I gave you evidence of his religiosity and not through what "someone said he said" but from the horse's mouth. I repeat : he was a theist and anti clergy which explains his measures affecting negatively the Church. His theism endorsed the cult of the elevation of the Teutonic German ideal to the rank of a deity. Thus the inclusion of pan Germanic references in his theistic concepts.
and I repeat, there is evidence that supports him being atheist and a christian, using religion to control and promote his ideals.

Quote:
Oh my... you have such dreams of grandeur to think that Dawkins would agree with you.
And you seem to have completly ignored the quote I provided. Typical.


Quote:
You seem to not understand that my goal is to demonstrate that Hitler was NOT an atheist. Prof. Wistrich does not mean to convey that Hitler was not a theist. He is only pointing to the reality that the "devil" and "his disciples" (Hitler and his cohorts) were planning to dismantle the Church to prevent it from interfering with the Final Solution (the shoah).
You seem to not understand that my goal is to demonosrate that there is evidence that says hitler was an atheist and also evidence that says hitler was a theist, so you are actually proving my point.



Quote:
Mein Kampf reveals (once more) who Hitler truly was. We are speaking here of a document which lays out the blue prints of the horrifying architectural project of the Third Reich. If Hitler failed to become an architect, he certainly compensated by methodically planning every detail of his future.Up to his death.Up to insuring that his remains would not "suffer" the same fate as il Duce's thus requesting they be burnt. Still mixing the symbolism of Teutonic heroes whose remains would be burnt.
of course your constant references to mein kampf are lacking the facts that are layed out above.
Quote:
Oh non, you are not "leaving" us. You are going to be meeting me in a different thread as soon as you are done with your other "debate". No matter how long it takes you to be prepared and equipped.
another example of you ignoring want.

Quote:
The elimination project was not based on ethnicity and religion. It was based on neutralizing any potential obstacle to Hitler's despotism.
Now sabine is disagreeing with a historian and asserting things with no evidence. Classic.


Quote:
Rosenberg was the inspirer of "Positive Christianity", a movement which meant to promote Christ as an Aryan hero while portraying him as devout to antisemitism. Rosenberg relied on Biblical scriptures to demonstrate the heroic aspect of Jesus' life. There is no doubt that "Positive Christianity" could not have existed without conservative Christianity as a foundation. Hauer who was one of the leaders of the German Faith Movement had succeeded in convincing Hess to obtain special rights for his religious movement.
Somehow sabine thinks that a history lesson on rosenburg is a logical rebuttal.
dr lazer blast is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 12:49 PM   #185
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noe Sandoval View Post

Ignoring that, I'm still curious as to how many people were actually executed by communist countries due to their religion.
Is there any information that verifies that this occurred?
Stalin killed about 95000 and his predecessor Lenin killed about 1300 priests and other clerics. The numbers are from Wikipedia (look up the Russian Orthodox church) but seem to originate from the church itself, IIRC. I made a link to that somewhere previously in this thread.

As horrifying as those numbers are, they are still a very small percentage of Stalin's total kills.

ETA: Did he kill them because he hated religious people? Hard to tell, but it is arguable that he wanted to curb the church' power and confiscate their assets.
thentian is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 01:31 PM   #186
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: America?
Posts: 1,168
Default

I wonder why lazer blast even cares about those religious people. They probably aren't even considered Christians by his denomination's doctrine of faith. If he really knew them he'd probably compare them to Christians like the Ku Klux Klaners.

I know! He's using them for his own agenda.

If his congregation has really sent doc here to do research on atheism, they sound like a lot of the failing churches across the United States, so now they are trying all sorts of zany missions to try to bring people into their fold.

What ever his denomination of Christianity might happen to be, the fact that the higher ups in the church make their living from donations, also called tithes, shows why they are coming up with all this bullshit to try and get more membership.

Hey doc, what's the matter, did invite a friend to church fail as miserably as everyone of your threads has, so now you guys have to resort to this suicide mission of attacking atheists?

lazer blast's church is no different then any of the church's that robbed the hell of people since talking snakes became extinct...

Some Communists may not have believed in any God, like Lenin supposedly, but any deaths should be attributed to the religious for the role they played.
It takes two to Tango!
Exciter is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 01:40 PM   #187
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Amsterdam,NL
Posts: 2,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr lazer blast View Post
Quote:
In monarchies the king held all of the power. I am not going to name all 1700 of them but a good example would be king louie and just about all of the kings during the middle ages, charlemagne is another good example.
ah yes you were totally ignorant in the context I used. I was talking about kings that held absolute power, a good example would be king louie, considering he was a king that held absolute power, furthermore you were ignorant as to which king louis i was talking about. Looks like you didn't know what you were talking about.
I think it's pretty important to distinguish between King Louis (I presume you mean XIV) and King Louie. One was the Sun King who ruled France for 72 years; the other was King of the Swingers. Not difficult to tell apart, really.
And, BTW, Charlemagne is actually a very poor example of an absolute monarch. As in more or less all early medieval kingdoms, much power in the Frankish lands was in the hands of the local barons with the king in the role of primus inter pares. He's a great example of a xian ruler, though, as his swordpoint conversion of the Saxons showed. 4500 beheaded in one day at the massacre of Verden; just think what he could have done with 20th century technology!

C_M_S
C_Mucius_Scaevola is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 01:55 PM   #188
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GR, MI USA
Posts: 4,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thentian View Post
Stalin killed about 95000 and his predecessor Lenin killed about 1300 priests and other clerics.

As horrifying as those numbers are, they are still a very small percentage of Stalin's total kills.

ETA: Did he kill them because he hated religious people? Hard to tell, but it is arguable that he wanted to curb the church' power and confiscate their assets.
Stalin:
Was brought up by the Orthodox Church, also had trained to be a priest. His hero was Ivan the Terrible

("terrible" possibly being a mistranslation), a "real" Christian.
After his political crackdown on rebellious church leaders (and others) he then re-instituted the Orthodox church.

-------------

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenin)

Lenin:
Lenin was baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church (as a child).

[Clearly he was all about a political movement and the church was targeted only because they tried to rise up against his power.]

According to Orlando Figes, Lenin had always been an advocate of “mass terror against enemies of the revolution” and was open about his view that the proletarian state was a system of organized violence against the capitalist establishment. Figes also claims that the terror, while encouraged by the Bolsheviks, had its roots in a popular anger against the privileged.
In a letter of March 19, 1922, to Molotov and the members of the Politburo, following an uprising by the clergy in the town of Shuia, Lenin outlined a brutal plan of action against the clergy and their followers, who were defying the government decree to remove church valuables: "We must (...) put down all resistance with such brutality that they will not forget it for several decades. (...) The greater the number of representatives of the reactionary clergy and reactionary bourgeoisie we succeed in executing (...) the better."According to Church records, 2,691 priests, 1,962 monks and 3,447 nuns were killed that year.

While Lenin remained opposed to outward forms of anti-semitism (and all forms of racism), allowing Jewish people to rise to the highest offices in both party and state, certain historians such as Dmitri Volkogonov argue that the record of his government in this regard was highly uneven. It is claimed that Lenin was aware of pogroms carried out by units of the Red Army during the war with Poland, though the whole issue was effectively ignored. Dmitri Volkogonov generalizes that "While condemning anti-Semitism in general, Lenin was unable to analyse, let alone eradicate, its prevalence in Soviet society". Likewise, the hostility of the Soviet regime towards all religion made no exception for Judaism, and the 1921 campaign against religion saw the seizure of many synagogues (whether this should be regarded as anti-Semitism is a matter of definition since Orthodox churches received the same treatment).

The chaotic years of World War I, the February and October Revolutions, and the Civil War were fertile ground for the antisemitism that was endemic to tsarist Russia. During the war, Jews were accused of sympathizing with Germany and often persecuted. Russian anti-semitism continued even after the lifting of official anti-Jewish restrictions by the February regime and the Bolsheviks. Pogroms were unleashed throughout the Civil War, perpetrated by virtually every competing faction, from anarchists, to Polish and Ukrainian nationalists to the Red and White Armies.

Continuing the policy of the Bolsheviks before the Revolution, Lenin and the Bolshevik Party strongly condemned the pogroms, including official denunciations in 1918 by the Council of People's Commissars. Opposition to the pogroms and to manifestations of Russian anti-semitism in this era were complicated by both the official bolshevik policy of assimilationism towards all national and religious minorities, and concerns about overemphasizing Jewish concerns for fear of exacerbating popular anti-semitism, as the White forces were openly identifying the Bolshevik regime with Jews.

In September 1918, during the Red Terror, 25 former tsarist ministers and high civil servants along with 765 so-called White Guards were shot in Moscow. Lenin personally signed the execution lists. Despite this attempt by Lenin to stop them the Whites continued active and indulged in a massive anti-Red terror and also pogroms against the Jews. For instance the Whites killed 115,000 Ukrainian Jews in 1919 alone. According to historian Christopher Read the numbers killed by the White forces were on a comparable scale to the Bolsheviks and probably can be numbered in hundreds of thousands. But, according to The Black Book of Communism, the two types of terror were not on the same level. The Red Terror, which was official policy, was more systematic, better organized, and targeted at whole social classes.

Lenin was intrigued with technology and in 1919 recorded eight of his speeches on gramophone records. Seven were later re-recorded and put on sale in the Khrushchev era. Significantly the one which was suppressed outlined Lenin’s feelings on anti-Semitism:

“The Tsarist police, in alliance with the landowners and the capitalists, organized pogroms against the Jews. The landowners and capitalists tried to divert the hatred of the workers and peasants who were tortured by want against the Jews. … Only the most ignorant and downtrodden people can believe the lies and slander that are spread about the Jews. … It is not the Jews who are the enemies of the working people. The enemies of the workers are the capitalists of all countries. Among the Jews there are working people, and they form the majority. They are our brothers, who, like us, are oppressed by capital; they are our comrades in the struggle for socialism. Among the Jews there are kulaks, exploiters and capitalists, just as there are among the Russians, and among people of all nations… Rich Jews, like rich Russians, and the rich in all countries, are in alliance to oppress, crush, rob and disunite the workers… Shame on accursed Tsarism which tortured and persecuted the Jews. Shame on those who foment hatred towards the Jews, who foment hatred towards other nations."

However, according to Jewish historian Zvi Gitelman: "Never before in Russian history — and never subsequently has a government made such an effort to uproot and stamp out anti-Semitism".
ELECTROGOD is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 02:55 PM   #189
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: America?
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_Mucius_Scaevola View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr lazer blast View Post

ah yes you were totally ignorant in the context I used. I was talking about kings that held absolute power, a good example would be king louie, considering he was a king that held absolute power, furthermore you were ignorant as to which king louis i was talking about. Looks like you didn't know what you were talking about.
I think it's pretty important to distinguish between King Louis (I presume you mean XIV) and King Louie. One was the Sun King who ruled France for 72 years; the other was King of the Swingers. Not difficult to tell apart, really.
century technology!
And here I thought old doc laser blast was talking about this guy, he was a pretty nice fella, kinda long winded, but nice.

I'm glad someone cleared that up, I thought doc had really stepped of the deep end on that one...
Exciter is offline  
Old 07-27-2008, 07:13 PM   #190
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

Dr R J Rummel has made an estimate of Communist Democide 1900-1987. I guess this is the best one available. For those who can't be bothered to follow the link I'll just give the totals here:

Low estimate: 40 472 000
Mid estimate: 110 286 000
High estimate: 259 432 000

It is very interesting to read what he has to say about the causes behind all this bloodshed:

Quote:
How can we understand all this killing by communists? It is the marriage of an absolutist ideology with the absolute power. Communists believed that they knew the truth, absolutely. They believed that they knew through Marxism what would bring about the greatest human welfare and happiness. And they believed that power, the dictatorship of the proletariat, must be used to tear down the old feudal or capitalist order and rebuild society and culture to realize this utopia. Nothing must stand in the way of its achievement. Government--the Communist Party--was thus above any law. All institutions, cultural norms, traditions, and sentiments were expendable. And the people were as though lumber and bricks, to be used in building the new world.

Constructing this utopia was seen as though a war on poverty, exploitation, imperialism, and inequality. And for the greater good, as in a real war, people are killed. And thus this war for the communist utopia had its necessary enemy casualties, the clergy, bourgeoisie, capitalists, wreckers, counterrevolutionaries, rightists, tyrants, rich, landlords, and noncombatants that unfortunately got caught in the battle. In a war millions may die, but the cause may be well justified, as in the defeat of Hitler and an utterly racist Nazism. And to many communists, the cause of a communist utopia was such as to justify all the deaths. The irony of this is that communism in practice, even after decades of total control, did not improve the lot of the average person, but usually made their living conditions worse than before the revolution. It is not by chance that the greatest famines have occurred within the Soviet Union (about 5,000,000 dead during 1921-23 and 7,000,000 from 1932-3) and communist China (about 27,000,000 dead from 1959-61). In total almost 55,000,000 people died in various communist famines and associated diseases, a little over 10,000,000 of them from democidal famine. This is as though the total population of Turkey, Iran, or Thailand had been completely wiped out. And that something like 35,000,000 people fled communist countries as refugees, as though the countries of Argentina or Columbia had been totally emptied of all their people, was an unparalleled vote against the utopian pretensions of Marxism-Leninism.

But communists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific, based on historical materialism, an understanding of the dialectical process in nature and human society, and a materialist (and thus realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown empirically where society has been and why, and he and his interpreters proved that it was destined for a communist end. No one could prevent this, but only stand in the way and delay it at the cost of more human misery. Those who disagreed with this world view and even with some of the proper interpretations of Marx and Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt, wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other words, communism was like a fanatical religion. It had its revealed text and chief interpreters. It had its priests and their ritualistic prose with all the answers. It had a heaven, and the proper behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to faith. And it had its crusade against nonbelievers.
Cheers!
thentian is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.