Alethias

No. I'm not interested in how you responded to atheists on other forums. If you want to have a discussion with people here, I suggest you do so.

Underseer

Can I eat your babies? We atheists love to eat a couple of babies for breakfast. They go great with a side of eggs, you know.

Just kidding.

Welcome to our little nut house community. Enjoy your stay!

saukhasi

I can only reply at a certain time of each day. If you want can't wait for even 24 hours, I don't know who's being unpolite here.

'Whether you care to admit it or not, belief in god(s) is superstition, and irrational."

- I don't disagree with that. But to be sure that there is no God, one would require trust in that our findings and evidence are complete and human intelligence is complete enough to interpret the evidence/findings absolutely. If no one can provide logical or scientific support on either of those statements, then that would mean to believe there can't be a God would require faith.

"I'm not interested in how you responded to atheists on other forums. If you want to have a discussion with people here, I suggest you do so."

- ok being moderator doesn't mean you tell people what they already know.

ELECTROGOD

Well, if you are carrying on the same conversation at the same time on 7 other boards then I don't think that you are properly applying yourself to the limited time you have in the day.

Are you talking about "a" god (as in a concept that is unknowable since you cannot disprove a negative or that which doesn't appear to exist in the first place) or "the" Christian god?

How would we know that you know already if you have demonstrated with what you posted that you apparently don't know that already?
Or is it just now that you know, you know that you know because someone has pointed it out?

fatpie42

Well this is a pointless thread. The guy brings out a load of half-baked claims with the strange belief that he is being somewhat original, and then he doesn't respond to the replies. THEN he makes an entirely different thread explaining that he is not a Jehovah's witness. Who said he was?

Tuvar Ane Ingolenen

Except for those Gods that are defined as selfcontradictory, like omnimax Gods. To say that square triangles do not exist you do not need to check every triangle in the universe to make sure whether some might be squares.The same kind of faith is required to believe that Zeus or the IPU is not real, or that the universe was not created fully formed by a hamster last thursday.

Not being sure something is impossible is not a good reason to believe it.

Jobar

Tuvar addresses your points in much the same way I would. We make no claims to infallibility or omniscience, saukhasi; in fact we would say that such absolute abilities are impossible in this universe described by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Absolute anything appears to be impossible.

Since God is defined as having several absolute properties, we don't see how such a being can exist in this universe. So, we lack belief in your god, or any other about which we've been told; while we won't say that it's impossible that there are universes other than this one wherein something that might be called a god might exist, we know nothing about any other universe. Therefore honesty compels us to disbelieve in god(s).

mirage

The other one got locked very quickly.

Can't remember who, but someone did.

angela2

It would sound as if complete honesty would compel you to say it's an open question.

angela2

No, but it's a damned good reason to not say unequivocally that the Christian God does not exist. And it's an even better reason to not disparage that God.