FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2005, 02:18 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Explain the Evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED DAVE
praxeus, looking at the Exodus, from the other end, the conquest of Canaan, how do you, with yor Biblical inerrancy, account for the fact that there is no evidence for a systematic, violent conquest of Canaan?
More than just absence of evidence for a conquest, praxeus needs to explain the existing evidence against a massive conquest, which is a series of artifacts displaying a complete continuity of culture across the relevant centuries. He needs to explain why architecture, pottery, and writing all remained virtually unchanged despite the supposed death of all the local architects, potters, and scribes.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 06-10-2005, 09:00 PM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

You're probably right, Sauron. I dealt with him personally at my forum about the LXX. Basically, I bitched slapped him so hard his only arguement afterwards was "well, since you don't believe in divine inspiration, I'm not going to participate here". Then he disappeared for several months and voila, he turns up here, trying to argue the same garbage.

I wish I still had the conversation...you'd have gotten a kick out of it.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 05:44 AM   #73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default

Bumped (to give prax one more chance to support Wyatt)
gregor is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 02:14 PM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus
Saruon, I have answered this about three times. I really have no idea what is your fixation on the Sinai name of Kadesh-Barnea, for which you have given zilch evidence.
If you believe that it is *not* the same as the placename of the bible, then the onus is on you to prove that. It is you here who has a claim contrary to the established position; I do not.

Quote:
If I get straight answers out of these questions, then we may have a base of dialog here.
Unlikely, since you enjoy dodging questions more than you enjoy supporting your positions. Which is doubtless why you've vanished again without supporting your positions, even though the record shows you were online yesterday at 1:34 pm.
Sauron is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 02:50 PM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Give it up, he's gone. So dishonest. When you know you're wrong, instead of admitting it, you find new gullibles to lie to. :down:
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 06:06 PM   #76
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
Why can't you simply answer the question?

WHERE IS the artifact itself?

How can the "folks from the professional establishement" examine an artifact they don't have?
What difference does it make since the only textual source we have about the Exodus says the event did not take place anywhere near the Gulf of Aqaba ?
Trevor Compact is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 07:03 PM   #77
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Now, to be clear, the "Ark of the Covenant" claims of Ron are the least supported
Wyatt's Ark claims have NO SOURCE, that is the Bible clearly says, repeatedly, in many different ways that the High Priest had to carry the blood of the sacrifice into the Most Holy FROM the outer court.

Outer Court/Altar of Burnt Offering typifies Calvary (propitiation).

Holy of Holies/Ark, kaporeth, typifies heaven, or as the theologians use the precise N.T. Greek word, "propitiatory".

The blood dripping on the Ark is sourceless.

Hebrews makes it clear: Christ is the eternal High Priest after the order of Melchizidek, and He carried His own blood to heaven where He splattered the genuine article with His blood.

Wyatt should of studied his Bible before making blatant fallacious claims.
Trevor Compact is offline  
Old 06-26-2005, 01:00 PM   #78
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default

Ron Wyatt claimed to have found Jesus' blood and had it analyzed. It was said to hav ehad 24 chromosomes: 23 from Mary and 1 from God. That claim alone speaks volumes about Wyatt.

And as far as chariot wheels in the Red Sea: finding a chariot wheel in the Red Sea is about as unusual as finding a Chevy in the Mississippi river.
McD is offline  
Old 06-26-2005, 07:55 PM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDuffie
Ron Wyatt claimed to have found Jesus' blood and had it analyzed. It was said to have had 24 chromosomes: 23 from Mary and 1 from God. That claim alone speaks volumes about Wyatt.
I guess it means that he hasn't thought too much about the Chalcedonian creed.

Stephen
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 07-03-2005, 09:55 AM   #80
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 148
Default Nope, don't give me that foolishness that he was a "fraud".

praxeus,

Glad to see you haven't been "burnt out yet" by the negativity toward Ron Wyatt.

It's interesting to note how within the last decade, scientists and accredited universities are finally beginning to take Ron's claims seriously, and realize that he wasn't so "off the wall" as they originally thought. For years they said he was a "big fraud". Not so anymore.

People like RED DAVE will see in the end who was the REAL deluded one. I basically slammed my head in the wall after argueing with these INFIDEL nutcases. I posted 4 part massive Noah's Ark thread proving once and for all that Noah's Ark could not be a geological formation based on the thousands of "hot spots" detected all across the boat-shaped Durupinar site, but nothing that I said made a dent or came to any avail when it comes to atheists. You can take a look at it here if you wish: Noah's Ark site at Dogubayazit - Shedding New Light

Also, more evidence that slaps critics in the face. It wasn't a shrapnel piece afterall in the Garden Tomb. Ron Wyatt was right afterall:

Embedded Metal Pin in the Garden Tomb

http://www.wyattmuseum.com/metal_pin_main.htm

http://www.wyattmuseum.com/metal_pin_report.htm

It will take probably a couple more decades before the critics start waking up. Heh, if they only knew who's the "deluded" ones here.

Sorry guys, ya have to quit your criticisms and attacks, or I guarantee you...you will be humiliated in the end.

I just visited Richard Rives and his family a few weeks ago. I spent many hours analyzing all the data they had. Everything is 100% authentic. I have so much to talk about on this subject...
Lysimachus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.