FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-2012, 07:04 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Date of the Ascension of Isaiah split from new reading

@EmmaZunz

According to WIKI this manuscript is first attested in the 4th century.

Although the way of Biblical Scholarship is to support ever-increasing early dates of composition - in the 1st and/or 2nd centuries - a date anywhere as late as the early 4th century (even a post-Nicaean date) is also hypothetically possible.

What are your thoughts on its dating?




Quote:
Originally Posted by WIKI


Manuscript tradition


The text exists as a whole in three Ethiopic manuscripts of around the 15th-18th centuries, but fragments have also survived in Greek, Coptic, Latin, and Old Slavonic. All three component texts appear to have been in Greek, and it is possible that the "Martyrdom of Isaiah" derives from a Hebrew or Aramaic original. Comparison of the various translations suggests that two different recensions of the Greek original must have existed; one on which the Ethiopic and one of the Latin versions was based, and the other on which the Slavonic and the other Latin version was based. Fragments of both Greek versions have survived. The work's current title is derived from the title used in the Ethiopic manuscripts ('Ergata Īsāyèyās – "The Ascension of Isaiah"). In antiquity, Epiphanius also referred to it by this title (in Greek: Τὸ Αναβατικὸν Ἡσαΐου), as did Jerome (in Latin: Ascensio Isaiæ).
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-12-2012, 08:39 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Don't answer him, Emma!!!

GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 05:34 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Don't answer him, Emma!!!

The sequence of "heavens" is referenced in the mid 4th century Nag Hammadi Codices, such as On the Origin of the World:

Quote:
"another being, called Jesus Christ, who resembles the savior above in the eighth heaven, and who sits at his right upon a revered throne"
There is a blind insistence at work, to shuffle all available texts into the 3rd, or 2nd or 1st centuries WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE. Doesn't the fact that the earliest attestation for the AoI is Epiphanius (later 4th century) count for anything at all?
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 06:47 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Pete - you have worn out this topic. You are unwilling to examine the actual evidence - you only come up with excuses to reject anything that does not fit your assumptions.

Do not drag this thread off topic.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:01 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
You are unwilling to examine the actual evidence ....
What is the actual evidence for examination, cited from scholarship, by which the hypothetical chronology of this text is seen to be 2nd century authorship?
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:04 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Anyone who wants to can discuss that side topic here.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:13 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Seeker introduced the question of chronology by quoting Earl Doherty ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by seeker View Post
Oddly enough Doherty takes on this subject here.

An excerpt:

Quote:
Muller makes a number of basic mistakes here. First, he treats all parts of the composite Ascension of Isaiah as if the document were a unity from the beginning. In fact, they began life as two separate pieces: chapters 1 to 5, known as The Martyrdom of Isaiah, and chapters 6 to 11, known as the Vision of Isaiah. And within the former, 3:13-4:22 is generally regarded as a Christian interpolation. Thus, arguments made in regard to the first portion of the Ascension cannot be applied to the second, and are quite immaterial.

Second, the dating of the document is far more complex than Muller lets on. Again, dating the final composite version (coming at the end of a long and complex history of redaction and additions, with multiple manuscript lines, etc.) to the latter part of the second century, even if it were accurate, is of no value in determining what any given passage might have meant to the original writer or earlier editors. Besides, such a dating is not universal. Michael Knibb, translator and commentator on the Ascension of Isaiah in The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (vol.2, p.143-176) dates the Martyrdom around the end of the first century CE, while the Vision, its date being "more difficult to determine," he places in "the second century" [p.149-150]. The joining of the two parts may not have occurred, he suggests, until the third or even the fourth century.
How does Knibb arrive at these chronological estimates?

Quote:
Quote:
Third, it is by no means necessary to interpret the passages and references Muller highlights as having a docetic significance. In fact, there is a notable lack of any attention to docetism in this entire document. If the descending Son in chapter 9 taking on a human "form" is docetic, then so is the pre-Pauline hymn in Philippians 2:6-11. Moreover, some of the 'forms' taken on by the Son as he passes through the levels of heaven are angelic, which hardly relates to docetism. The principle of a divine being taking on the 'forms' of the spheres he is traversing is an aspect of the descent mythology under discussion. It was a concept that existed quite independently of principles of docetism, and really has nothing to do with it. When the demons of the firmament who hang the Son on a tree "think that he is flesh and a man" (9:13) the issue is his identity, the Son disguising himself so that his true identity is not recognized, not the issue inherent in docetism, that Christ was of phantom flesh rather than genuine flesh, so that he did not really suffer or take on the weaknesses of matter.

Fourth, Muller fails to take into account that 11:2-22 is almost certainly a later interpolation, based on Gospel-like traditions—though at a primitive level. (Carrier concurs, and even Muller at one point identifies the passage as an interpolation, so it's all very confusing.) I argue this in Appendix 4 of my book [p.308f], which Muller seems to ignore.
What is relevant here is the dating of both the Ascension and Vision of Isaiah as clearly not only in the Christian era but in the Gnostic era. Unfortunately the nature of the doctrinal wars between various Christian factions of that era is that any document from that era is bound to represent an ideological faction, in this case Gnosticism.

Still the main point of the OP is the notion of a mythical realm which is really Platonic. Doherty makes the same connection that most scholars make, ie that the Gnostic view of the nature of heaven and hell is grounded in Plato's Theory of Forms which theorizes that this world is just an imperfect copy of the heavenly master copy. Bottom line is that it was Plato's notions of the nature of heaven and hell that informed most theology during the Greek and Roman eras and is clearly present in the mystery religions of the era. There is every reason to believe that the gnostic version of Christianity would have adopted this view as well.

Once the Church asserted its authority and declared Gnosticism a heresy they made a concerted effort to eliminate references to the notion that Jesus existed only on a mythical plane.
The Gnostic element is Platonic, and if it can be demonstrated to be Plotinic, then the text is late and probably from the 4th century, since that is when authodoxy politically appeared. There are a number of texts in the NHC that exhibit late (i.e "Neo-" or Plotinic) Platonism, so comparitive texts do exist.
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 05:02 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

The text has the idea of Nero as coming back as an anti-christ, which existed around the end of the First Century. So that part of the text is usually dated to around that time.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 06:28 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
You are unwilling to examine the actual evidence ....
What is the actual evidence for examination, cited from scholarship, by which the hypothetical chronology of this text is seen to be 2nd century authorship?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
The text has the idea of Nero as coming back as an anti-christ, which existed around the end of the First Century. So that part of the text is usually dated to around that time.
Thanks GDon. It's not a trap. I am in the dark just like everyone else. There is nothing in these ancient non canonical texts that has permitted the scholars and academics who have examined them to be certain about their hypothetical chronology.

According to Peter Kirby's page on Ascension of Isaiah, M. A. Knibb writes (The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 2, p. 143):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knibb

There are a number of indications which point to the view that 3:13-4:22 was copmosed at about the end of the first century A.D. This section of the Ascension is clearly later than the death of Nero in A.D. 68 because it refers to the expectation that Nero would come again as the "Antichrist" (see 4:2b-4a); presumably a little time would have been needed for this belief to develop, and this suggests a date at the earliest toward the end of the first century.

The relevant section of the text found here is as follows:

Quote:
Originally Posted by English Translation of text for sections 3:13-4:22 by R. H. Charles

13. For Beliar was in great wrath against Isaiah by reason of the vision, and because of the exposure wherewith he had exposed Sammael, and because through him the going forth of the Beloved from the seventh heaven had been made known, and His transformation and His descent and the likeness into which He should be transformed (that is) the likeness of man, and the persecution wherewith he should be persecuted, and the torturers wherewith the children of Israel should torture Him, and the coming of His twelve disciples, and the teaching, and that He should before the sabbath be crucified upon the tree, and should be crucified together with wicked men, and that He should be buried in the sepulchre,

14. And the twelve who were with Him should be offended because of Him: and the watch of those who watched the sepulchre:

15. And the descent of the angel of the Christian Church, which is in the heavens, whom He will summon in the last days.

16. And that (Gabriel) the angel of the Holy Spirit, and Michael, the chief of the holy angels, on the third day will open the sepulchre:

17. And the Beloved sitting on their shoulders will come forth and send out His twelve disciples;

18. And they will teach all the nations and every tongue of the resurrection of the Beloved, and those who believe in His cross will be saved, and in His ascension into the seventh heaven whence He came:

19. And that many who believe in Him will speak through the Holy Spirit:

20. And many signs and wonders will be wrought in those days.

21. And afterwards, on the eve of His approach, His disciples will forsake the teachings of the Twelve Apostles, and their faith, and their love and their purity.

22. And there will be much contention on the eve of [His advent and] His approach.

23. And in those days many will love office, though devoid of wisdom.

24. And there will be many lawless elders, and shepherds dealing wrongly by their own sheep, and they will ravage (them) owing to their not having holy shepherds.

25. And many will change the honour of the garments of the saints for the garments of the covetous, and there will be much respect of persons in those days and lovers of the honour of this world.

26. And there will be much slander and vainglory at the approach of the Lord, and the Holy Spirit will withdraw from many.

27. And there will not be in those days many prophets, nor those who speak trustworthy words, save one here and there in divers places,

28. On account of the spirit of error and fornication and of vainglory, and of covetousness, which shall be in those, who will be called servants of that One and in those who will receive that One.

29. And there will be great hatred in the shepherds and elders towards each other.

30. For there will be great jealousy in the last days; for every one will say what is pleasing in his own eyes.

31. And they will make of none effect the prophecy of the prophets which were before me, and these my visions also will they make of none effect, in order to speak after the impulse of their own hearts.

CHAPTER 4

AND now Hezekiah and Josab my son, these are the days of the completion of the world.
2. After it is consummated, Beliar the great ruler, the king of this world, will descend, who hath ruled it since it came into being; yea, he will descent from his firmament in the likeness of a man, a lawless king, the slayer of his mother: who himself (even) this king.

3. Will persecute the plant which the Twelve Apostles of the Beloved have planted. Of the Twelve one will be delivered into his hands.

4. This ruler in the form of that king will come and there will come and there will come with him all the powers of this world, and they will hearken unto him in all that he desires.
5. And at his word the sun will rise at night and he will make the moon to appear at the sixth hour.

6. And all that he hath desired he will do in the world: he will do and speak like the Beloved and he will say: "I am God and before me there has been none."

7. And all the people in the world will believe in him. 8. And they will sacrifice to him and they will serve him saying: "This is God and beside him there is no other."

9. And they greater number of those who shall have been associated together in order to receive the Beloved, he will turn aside after him.

10. And there will be the power of his miracles in every city and region.

11. And he will set up his image before him in every city.

12. And he shall bear sway three years and seven months and twenty-seven days.

13. And many believers and saints having seen Him for whom they were hoping, who was crucified, Jesus the Lord Christ, [after that I, Isaiah, had seen Him who was crucified and ascended] and those also who were believers in Him - of these few in those days will be left as His servants, while they flee from desert to desert, awaiting the coming of the Beloved.

14. And after (one thousand) three hundred and thirty-two days the Lord will come with His angels and with the armies of the holy ones from the seventh heaven with the glory of the seventh heaven, and He will drag Beliar into Gehenna and also his armies.

15. And He will give rest of the godly whom He shall find in the body in this world, [and the sun wil be ashamed]:

16. And to all who because of (their) faith in Him have execrated Beliar and his kings. But the saints will come with the Lord with their garments which are (now) stored up on high in the seventh heaven: with the Lord they will come, whose spirits are clothed, they will descend and be present in the world, and He will strengthen those, who have been found in the body, together with the saints, in the garments of the saints, and the Lord will minister to those who have kept watch in this world.

17. And afterwards they will turn themselves upward in their garments, and their body will be left in the world.

18. Then the voice of the Beloved will in wrath rebuke the things of heaven and the things of earth and the things of earth and the mountains and the hills and the cities and the desert and the forests and the angel of the sun and that of the moon, and all things wherein Beliar manifested himself and acted openly in this world, and there will be [a resurrection and] a judgment in their midst in those days, and the Beloved will cause fire to go forth from Him, and it will consume all the godless, and they will be as though they had not been created.

19. And the rest of the words of the vision is written in the vision of Babylon.

20. And the rest of the vision regarding the Lord, behold, it is written in three parables according to my words which are written in the book which I publicly prophesied.

21. And the descent of the Beloved into Sheol, behold, it is written in the section, where the Lord says: "Behold my Son will understand." And all these things, behold they are written [in the Psalms] in the parables of David, the son of Jesse, and in the Proverbs of Solomon his son, and in the words of Korah, and Ethan the Israelite, and in the words of Asaph, and in the rest of the Psalms also which the angel of the Spirit inspired.

22. (Namely) in those which have not the name written, and in the words of my father Amos, and of Hosea the prophet, and of Micah and Joel and Nahum and Jonah and Obadiah and Habakkuk and Haggai and Malachi, and in the words of Joseph the Just and in the words of Daniel.

What is described (CH.4) as "The expectation that Nero would come again as the "Antichrist" (see 4:2b-4a)" is bolded above.

It is presented as a allegorical narrative about .... "the days of the completion of the world.".


Whether this refers to Nero or another Roman Emperor remains to be determined. The sources that link Nero to the persecution of christians and the death (crucifixion of the apostles - Peter? Paul?) at his hands are few and tenuous. Many of them are apocryphal, and many of them are wild romance stories, where Peter and Simon Magus have flying miracle contests in the presence of Nero.

Having presented the evidence which leads SOME scholarship to give a 1st century date to the AoI, I will retire and think about it some. Other scholars, according the Peter Kirby's page, prefer a late 2nd century date. All seem to suggest that the finished manuscript was cobbled together from older parts in the 4th century, at which time it was attested by Jerome and Epiphanius.

Quote:
Originally Posted by C. Detlef G. Müller writes (New Testament Apocrypha, vol. 2, pp. 604-605)

Composition and date: in its present form the Ascensio Isaiae is a Christian work, which was put together at the earliest in the second half of the 2nd century. It was intended to combat, in the manner of an ancient apocalypse, certain contemporary evils, the lack of discipline and the divisions in the Church. One cannot however fail to recognize that the work takes up traditions already in existence and makes them serve its purpose.



If the author of this text was taking the opportunity to take up traditions, then it would appear to me (and already mentioned above) that one central tradition is Platonism. The whole concept of "The One" as the Supreme Divinity in a high heaven that is characterized by a numerical array of heavens is Platonic, Plotinic and Gnostic.

Therefore if we are dealing with "the days of the completion of the world" we could be dealing with an allegorical narrative concerning "the days of the completion of the Platonic world".
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:24 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Thanks GDon. It's not a trap. I am in the dark just like everyone else. There is nothing in these ancient non canonical texts that has permitted the scholars and academics who have examined them to be certain about their hypothetical chronology.
MM, I reject the notion "We don't know for sure, therefore we don't know at all." We can guess, and say "this is a good guess, based on the data available". Someone can always "Ned Ludd" any piece of data, that is, propose an alternate possibility, as if the mere existence of an alternative disproves any of the others, but that in itself is meaningless. The question to be asked is "What is the best explanation for the data we have?"

Let's list out the alternatives, and see what the data is to support them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
What is described (CH.4) as "The expectation that Nero would come again as the "Antichrist" (see 4:2b-4a)" is bolded above.

It is presented as a allegorical narrative about .... "the days of the completion of the world.".

Whether this refers to Nero or another Roman Emperor remains to be determined.
Seriously: Why? This is what the text has:
"he will descent from his firmament in the likeness of a man, a lawless king, the slayer of his mother: who himself (even) this king.
3. Will persecute the plant which the Twelve Apostles of the Beloved have planted. Of the Twelve one will be delivered into his hands.
No name is mentioned, which is standard in these early writings. I suppose you could use the argument that the author would use the name "Nero" if he knew it, but they simply didn't write that way back then. But who else can it be? Let's list the names of Emperors who reputedly killed their mothers and killed one of the Twelve Apostles. I'll start: Nero. Now you add a name.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
The sources that link Nero to the persecution of christians and the death (crucifixion of the apostles - Peter? Paul?) at his hands are few and tenuous. Many of them are apocryphal, and many of them are wild romance stories, where Peter and Simon Magus have flying miracle contests in the presence of Nero.
Irrelevant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Having presented the evidence which leads SOME scholarship to give a 1st century date to the AoI, I will retire and think about it some. Other scholars, according the Peter Kirby's page, prefer a late 2nd century date. All seem to suggest that the finished manuscript was cobbled together from older parts in the 4th century, at which time it was attested by Jerome and Epiphanius.
It is a document composed over a period of time, with a number of authors contributing. One part appears to be pre-Christian. Another part appears to have added after the Gospels started to become authoratitive, in the second half of the Second Century. The part we are looking at, which deals with the rumours of Nero returning, appears to have been written at the time when such rumours still existed. I.e the end of the First Century. This is the time that the Book of Revelation was thought to have been written, which some believe also points to Nero as the anti-Christ.

Do we know for sure? No. Is it a good guess? Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
If the author of this text was taking the opportunity to take up traditions, then it would appear to me (and already mentioned above) that one central tradition is Platonism. The whole concept of "The One" as the Supreme Divinity in a high heaven that is characterized by a numerical array of heavens is Platonic, Plotinic and Gnostic.

Therefore if we are dealing with "the days of the completion of the world" we could be dealing with an allegorical narrative concerning "the days of the completion of the Platonic world".
I have no idea what "the completion of the Platonic world" would mean in terms of thinking of the time. Ideal forms external to the world coming to an end? Ideal forms being completed? Neither concept makes sense to my understanding of what they thought. Is that your wording? Or do you have a link to where the concept "completion of the Platonic world" is discussed?

The "completion of the world" makes sense. The firmament would be rolled up like a scroll, the purifying fires of Heaven would eliminate the corrupt matter of this world, and a new heaven and new earth would be created to house the transformed bodies of those good folks to live there.
GakuseiDon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.