FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > The Community > Freethought Humor, Jokes, Etc.
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2005, 11:32 AM   #1
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default So which really did come first?

The chicken or the egg?

What I would like is the most smart-assed, yet scientific answer you can come up with.

I got this idea because several years ago, during a casual radio debate on E v. C, there was a moment of mirth when a caller asked this question. The evolutionist repeated the question back and answered 'a dinosaur'. Pretty good, off the cuff, but what would you guys have said?
McD is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:41 AM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 490
Default

The answer lies in the definition of "egg." Presumably we are speaking of a chicken egg, because if not then obviously some form of egg came before a chicken.

So, either a chicken egg is an egg of a chicken, in which case the chicken came first, or a chicken egg is an egg containing that which will be a chicken, in which case the egg came first.


On the other hand, the funniest answer I've ever seen is a cartoon of a rooster in bed smoking a cigarette and the chicken beside him saying "well I guess that answers that question"
jester2459 is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:44 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pacific time zone
Posts: 686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDuffie
The chicken or the egg?

What I would like is the most smart-assed, yet scientific answer you can come up with.

I got this idea because several years ago, during a casual radio debate on E v. C, there was a moment of mirth when a caller asked this question. The evolutionist repeated the question back and answered 'a dinosaur'. Pretty good, off the cuff, but what would you guys have said?
Seeing as chickens have evolved from an earlier bird species, and birds evolved from dinosaurs, and eggs have been in use at least that long, I think it stands to reason that the egg came first.

However to answer the question in a more fully satisfying way, I think it's necessary to replace the word "chicken" with the words "egg-laying organism", in which case we've thrown ourselves back at least into the Paleozoic. Egg-laying reproduction accompanies sexual reproduction, so we reach the point where there's an earlier, sexual, but not egg-laying, species which gives birth, however it may have done so, to an egg-laying species. As the egg-laying species must have existed in order to lay the eggs, I conclude that the egg-laying organism came first. Replace this with "chicken" and there you go.

[/bs]

Edit: a paradox!!
g-21-lto is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:57 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 10,066
Default

Trace it back through evolution... let the "egg" be the separated reproductive method (egg cell and sperm, pollen and stamen, whatever it is that produces a separate individual and develops discretely from the parent organism) and let "chicken" be the initial organism which is doing the breeding... and we must conclude that the chicken came first. I believe the genereal consensus is that self-replicating dividing organism predate sexual reproduction between separate individuals.

Chicken comes first...
muidiri is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:59 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 10,066
Default

It even works if you're a creationist... in which case god most certainly made all those darn birds before they got around to breeding and egg-laying.
muidiri is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 01:16 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: (GSV) Lasting Damage
Posts: 10,734
Default

the replicator.
Jet Black is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 01:24 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
Default

A slightly different chicken-like ancestor. Repeat Ad Infintum. (Well almost)
braces_for_impact is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 03:05 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,897
Default

So, where does the easter bunny fit in?
Dhaeron is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 03:52 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,914
Default

I guess the egg came before any chicken was around.
_Naturalist_ is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:33 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits
Posts: 8,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDuffie
The chicken or the egg?

What I would like is the most smart-assed, yet scientific answer you can come up with.

I got this idea because several years ago, during a casual radio debate on E v. C, there was a moment of mirth when a caller asked this question. The evolutionist repeated the question back and answered 'a dinosaur'. Pretty good, off the cuff, but what would you guys have said?
The egg, of course, because there were eggs long before chickens.
epepke is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.