FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2007, 08:50 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 976
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
This assumes that there are histories written from some unbiased, disinterested perspective, which is nonsense.

All historiography, and especially historiography from antiquity, is biased and subject to political and other agendas. That's why they wrote history.
Exactly. And especially when you need historical REVISIONISM do you need to write history. It is not just enough to destroy current historical records, you have to aggressive write and publish the substitute history. Greeks got into "history" starting with the "father of history", Herodotus, primarily because of Persian historical revisionism surrounding Xerxes claiming he was Artaxerxes (i.e. the Persian kings adopted a new name when they became sole ruler, in this case Xerxes used this with the help of Themistocles to claim he was an entirely different king, his own son).

Sometimes history is recorded for the recorded, though, and Thucydides seems to have done so for the sake of the record, but he tends to be quite rare.

Larsguy47
Larsguy47 is offline  
Old 03-28-2007, 11:17 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Music City USA, the Great Bible Bucket
Posts: 97
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larsguy47 View Post
Exactly. And especially when you need historical REVISIONISM do you need to write history. It is not just enough to destroy current historical records, you have to aggressive write and publish the substitute history. Greeks got into "history" starting with the "father of history", Herodotus, primarily because of Persian historical revisionism surrounding Xerxes claiming he was Artaxerxes (i.e. the Persian kings adopted a new name when they became sole ruler, in this case Xerxes used this with the help of Themistocles to claim he was an entirely different king, his own son).

Sometimes history is recorded for the recorded, though, and Thucydides seems to have done so for the sake of the record, but he tends to be quite rare.

Larsguy47

I'm sorry for the misunderstanding Larsguy, gstafleu and Gamera. My post was quoting from Clivedurdle's original post where he said "It is almost as if the Biblical writers deliberately rewrote history from their perspective...", to which I responded "That's pretty much a given." Asimov's Guide to the Bible very clearly demonstrates this right from the get-go.
.
Quintana Roo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.