Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-15-2006, 12:16 PM | #141 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
|
|
02-15-2006, 12:25 PM | #142 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Julian |
|||
02-15-2006, 02:36 PM | #143 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
Excellent thread all. A tad off-topic, but I always wondered why Greek? Do we know why Paul focused so much on Greece? Did he proselytize anywhere near Jerusalem? Do we have any extra-biblical evidence that the early Jesus cult even existed in or around Jerusalem and if so, what is it?
Also, who were the gospels written for? As I understand it, no "lay" person was allowed to read and/or didn't know how to read, so were the gospels supposed to be merely historical or some sort of cult textbook as they are used largely today? Also, Paul's letters clearly indicated (IMO) that a form of synagogue/church hierarchy was already in place (and seems to presage the familiar Catholic hierarchy more so than it resembles Jewish hierarchy) in far away lands, which would imply either that Jesus had formed his cult long before his death or that his death happened much earlier. Any evidence that anyone knows to either confirm or contradict that? Many thanks. |
02-16-2006, 12:26 AM | #144 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mid Wales, UK
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
So, basically we’re dealing with a Christian apologetic deceit here then, I guess. I also found another site which repeats the same kind of assertions (or tries to give the same kind of misleading impression) here: http://www.scionofzion.com/olv.htm, which says: Quote:
|
||
02-16-2006, 02:29 AM | #145 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
Why Greek? Because Greek in those days was the language of intellectuals, similar to what Latin became during the Middle Ages and well into Renaissance times. If you were a Roman intellectual you might write in your native language of Latin, but for nearly everyone else, if you learned to read and write, then you learned to write Greek and you assumed that anyone you corresponded with could read Greek. |
|
02-16-2006, 07:20 AM | #146 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
Quote:
|
|
02-16-2006, 07:50 AM | #147 | |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
Hebrew was no longer a commonly spoken language even in Palestine. The spoken language of Palestinian Jews was Aramaic. Hebrew was pretty much a language only of liturgy and scripture (perhaps somehat akin to what Church Latin used to be like in Europe. The priests, scholars and scribes knew it but most of the rabble did not). Greek was the lingua franca outside Palestine and was the language of Hellenistic Jews. They also used the Greek LXX rather than Hebrew texts of the Tanakh. Not only that but the audience for the Gospels and other writings of the NT was largely Gentile (and so were most of the authors, for that matter). |
|
02-16-2006, 07:55 AM | #148 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
Paul didn't focus on Greece in particular, at least not what we today would define as the modern Greece. His letters span churches from Asia Minor all the way to Rome. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Julian |
||||
02-16-2006, 07:59 AM | #149 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
Julian |
|
02-16-2006, 08:13 AM | #150 | ||
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|