![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2007 
				Location: florida 
				
				
					Posts: 887
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I see other scholars have done rebuttles of it.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I don't think so. I think that there have been "rebuttals" but not by scholars - only by apologists who are offended by the idea that there is a flaw in their scripture.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2003 
				Location: Brighton, England 
				
				
					Posts: 6,947
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Do you mean that you don't think Misquoting Jesus is good? Or do you just disagree that there have been rebuttals by scholars?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2005 
				Location: Wales 
				
				
					Posts: 11,620
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			bf, just get the (correct) idea into your head that there is nothing more special about Jesus (if he existed) than there is about any other charismatic religious figure past or present. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Miraculous claims were made about him, but miraculous claims have been made about lots of people. None substantiated. Let it go! It's nothing to worry about. Start healing. David B  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | ||
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2006 
				Location: Toronto. 
				
				
					Posts: 2,796
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			i thought "misquoting truth "made some interesting points in response to ehrman.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Misquoting Truth was discussed in this thread. The author is an apologist, not a scholar by the usual definition of the term.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | ||
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2006 
				Location: Toronto. 
				
				
					Posts: 2,796
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 why would his status as a non-scholar have any relevance to what i said?  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi ~M~ - so far you haven't said anything of substance. The OP raised the issue of "rebuttal by scholars." 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	What interesting points did the author of Misquoting Truth make, in your opinion?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2006 
				Location: Toronto. 
				
				
					Posts: 2,796
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 do you have any other replies to make that are virtually irrelevant to my own or can we end this now?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |