FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2004, 08:54 PM   #41
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by EGGO


I thought it was already covered that the ark would've collapsed in on itself, but I can't find it.

The term you are looking for is "hogging". That is why they have to be made from steel.


from: wooden ships


"Hogging is no longer the problem it was in the 1920's when it threatened the nation's merchant fleet -- because those ships have sunk!"
rlogan is offline  
Old 01-26-2004, 11:47 PM   #42
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,540
Default

Quote:
It would be more beneficial if babies or young animals were taken on the boat so they have a longer reproduction cycle after they got off.
The story of the flood indicates that Noah's family and the animals floated around for another 7 months following the 40 days and 40 nights of rain. In that time most of the animals would have reached adult size, so I think Plognark 's original estimate for space requirements would not be all that far off the mark.
Arctish is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 12:10 AM   #43
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,540
Default

originally posted by Godless Wonder
Quote:
My big question about the flood is this: supposing the flood is not meant to be taken literally, but meant to be taken figuratively. Ok, what does it mean then? What is the point of the story? Why is it in there?

Looking at it, the story of the rainbow seems very fable-ish/mythological. Here's a little story to tell why rainbows exist. But this is just a small part of the story, and does not seem to justify the entire story.
I think the importance of the Noah story lies in the fact that so many of the ancients lived in areas prone to annual flooding. No doubt some years the flooding was particularly bad, and people and livestock would have died attempting to reach safety. It would have been reassuring to them to believe that god had promised that he would not allow the floodwaters to destroy everything, and that the rainbow was a sign of that promise.
Arctish is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 04:54 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Family Man
In that case, I wonder where the Asians came from.
I wonder about that too. I've a fair idea it's a place called Asia.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 06:41 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma
The story of the flood indicates that Noah's family and the animals floated around for another 7 months following the 40 days and 40 nights of rain. In that time most of the animals would have reached adult size, so I think Plognark 's original estimate for space requirements would not be all that far off the mark.
I dunno. 7 months of waiting their turn to suckle off of Noah's wife and daughter-in-law's teats would certainly stunt growth in larger animals....
Dark Jedi is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 06:47 AM   #46
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

The story of the flood indicates that Noah's family and the animals floated around for another 7 months following the 40 days and 40 nights of rain. In that time most of the animals would have reached adult size, so I think Plognark 's original estimate for space requirements would not be all that far off the mark.

Yep; I took that into account actually. I did make the rough 50% cut in food and water consumption, although most animals can't even survive on less than 60% of either for long, i figured even if they were young, the food consumption of growing baby animals is quite staggering. Anyone out there ever had a puppy?

And, of course, Noah would have had to know EXACTLY when the boat would have landed to pack precicely enough food for all the animals. Somehow I don't think Noah was the greatest genius of logistics of all time.

I should do a full write up some time...might be interesting. I did it because a bunch of moron fundies were claiming that the boat was held together by the will of god, blah, blah, blah, so I finally got fed up and said the boat wasn't big enough. They didn't believe me so I went on a bit of a mathematical tirade.

I'm a huge nerd so maybe i'll write this up while skipping work tommorow (a couple feet of snow on the way)

Anyone got any favorite animals they want to pick for inclusion on the ark? Space is at a premium so get your votes in now!! Nothing too exotic, since most of my food consumption rates will be coming from zoo web sites; they may not have raw data.

I'll be ignoring food spoilage just to make a point as well. Maybe god can stop mold from growing on hay or meat from rotting or something. At any rate, you can't ignore volume. Unless god warped space and put a pocket dimension into the ark (better not give the idiots more ideas... :banghead: )
Plognark is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 08:02 AM   #47
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge AB Canada
Posts: 445
Default

I'm sort of wondering if you will need to factor in huge tanks for the critters that like water: can a Hippo be happy / healthy without a swimming pool? And otters and platypusses. Did walrusses adn seals survive by swimming or were they taken on board, too?

I don't suppose there needed to be any special rations for the dung-beetles.
DrJim is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 08:47 AM   #48
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

I'm not even going to be that generous. These animals get no free space; i'm talking no more than a foot of clearance on all sides of each animal, and those animals smaller than a cubic foot will be given exactly one cubic foot of space each, and i'll still put money that you can't come close to fitting even the broadest definition of "kind" on that stupid boat.

I may not even need to include beetles and bugs; i have a suspicion that i'll run out of room before then.

I'm pretty sure there was more than enough food for the dung beetles anyhow
Plognark is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 09:15 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Birds and Beetles

Quote:
Originally posted by Plognark
Anyone got any favorite animals they want to pick for inclusion on the ark? Space is at a premium so get your votes in now!! Nothing too exotic, since most of my food consumption rates will be coming from zoo web sites; they may not have raw data.
I want to see the math on just beetles. Given the large numbers of species that exist, I'll speculate that you could fill the entire ark with nothing but beetles.

Don't forget tropical birds, either. Again, each one is pretty small, but there are a huge number of species. And the phrase "eating like a bird" is very misleading, since birds can eat their entire bodyweight in a day.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 01-27-2004, 09:22 AM   #50
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

How long before Magus or some other myth-supporter claims that God coulda caused all those baby animals to hibernate for the entire voyage?

As big of a problem as the food on the ark is...what the hell did the animals eat after they left the ark? According to the flood-supporters, all those sedimentary layers were laid down by the flood, so the earth must have been absolutely barren, with any food source buried under thousands of feet of mud.
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.