FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Science Discussions
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2007, 01:26 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmurphy View Post
So humans are far from the longest-lived organisms on the planet? Why, Elijah, are they the smartest?

This idea that because humans are smart, they must once have lived for centuries is one of the less impressive hypotheses biblical literalists have ever come up with that I'm aware of.
Random mutations causing a big brain making us super smart makes me shrug to, so to each, what makes sense to them.
So you doubt the connection between brain size/body mass and intelligence? But you don't doubt that humans could have lived for ten centuries. Riiiight.

How humans got big brains is not the issue. The issue is, where is your evidence that humans ever lived much longer than three-score years and ten?

Quote:
We are long lived when it comes to animals. Only a couple of turtles and couple of whales that can get the opportunity to blow out as many birthday candles as us. Some plants can kick our butt though.
And this is evidence that humans once lived ten times as long as they do now? I think you've skipped a few steps in your logic, hoss.
ericmurphy is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 01:29 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
Don't forget tube worms. They must be the smartest critters of them all, what with life spans up to 250 years.
Tube worms are closer to plants. How could they learn? Productive lives. If any animal does nothing, observes nothing then it's not going to do much mental development.

Like I said there are exceptions to the rules but almost always with reason.

Logic according to Elijah:

1. Humans are smarter than most animals;
2. Humans live longer than most animals;




then way down here we have






N. Humans must once have lived far longer than they do now.


Can you fit some logic in somewhere between "2" and "N," Elijah? Because it appears to be missing.
ericmurphy is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 01:44 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmurphy View Post
Logic according to Elijah:

1. Humans are smarter than most animals;
2. Humans live longer than most animals;

then way down here we have

N. Humans must once have lived far longer than they do now.

Can you fit some logic in somewhere between "2" and "N," Elijah? Because it appears to be missing.
Learning takes time... developing the ability physically to learn takes more time. There is a huge difference between us and the intelligence of the nearest animal... and I mean huge. (from my perspective) The one and only explanation I have heard (that made sense) is that we lived much longer at a period in our history to account for the huge mental jump.

Random mutations of genes generating these complicated effects sounds like junk science to me, or at lease incomplete.
Elijah is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:02 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Learning takes time... developing the ability physically to learn takes more time. There is a huge difference between us and the intelligence of the nearest animal... and I mean huge. (from my perspective) The one and only explanation I have heard (that made sense) is that we lived much longer at a period in our history to account for the huge mental jump.
This is completely skirting the issue. How long do modern humans live, Elijah? Three-score years and ten, if they're lucky, right? Clearly it's not necessary to live for hundreds of years to become intelligent. Otherwise, there would be evidence that ancient humans were vastly more intelligent than modern humans. There is no such evidence.

Therefore, the intelligence of humans is in no way evidence that ante-diluvian humans lived for hundreds of years, is it?

Quote:
Random mutations of genes generating these complicated effects sounds like junk science to me, or at lease incomplete.
Your opinion on the subject is worthless as evidence of anything, but even if it were, whether mutations are a credible explanation for human intelligence is irrelevant to your argument that extremely long lives thousands of years ago is a credible explanation for the same thing.
ericmurphy is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:02 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Learning takes time... developing the ability physically to learn takes more time. There is a huge difference between us and the intelligence of the nearest animal... and I mean huge. (from my perspective) The one and only explanation I have heard (that made sense) is that we lived much longer at a period in our history to account for the huge mental jump.
BIG. BRAIN.

It's right over your nose, for crying out loud.

ETA: you know what, sod this for a lark. afdave's epistemology may be all shot to buggery fuck, but at least with him communication is possible. Whereas this conversation ...... dearie me! to remove temptation to participate in the inevitable derail I'm sticking Elijah on ignore.
The Evil One is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:12 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmurphy View Post

This is completely skirting the issue. How long do modern humans live, Elijah? Three-score years and ten, if they're lucky, right? Clearly it's not necessary to live for hundreds of years to become intelligent. Otherwise, there would be evidence that ancient humans were vastly more intelligent than modern humans. There is no such evidence.

Therefore, the intelligence of humans is in no way evidence that ante-diluvian humans lived for hundreds of years, is it?
You seen Idiocracy? Good movie.

Well the information we have collected as a whole may have grown the intelligence of the modern man as an individual is totally up for debate. People believe what they are told and nothing more.

It's not evidence but it is a workable explanation.
Elijah is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:15 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post

BIG. BRAIN.

It's right over your nose, for crying out loud.
I'm just guessing but you think a big brain led to our intelligence right? I think our intelligence or mental use is what led to the big brain. Same idea just backwards.

What you use grows, what you don't atrophies away.
Elijah is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:19 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
Default

Quote:
What you use grows, what you don't atrophies away.
This explains a great deal about your posts.
deadman_932 is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:20 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmurphy View Post

This is completely skirting the issue. How long do modern humans live, Elijah? Three-score years and ten, if they're lucky, right? Clearly it's not necessary to live for hundreds of years to become intelligent. Otherwise, there would be evidence that ancient humans were vastly more intelligent than modern humans. There is no such evidence.

Therefore, the intelligence of humans is in no way evidence that ante-diluvian humans lived for hundreds of years, is it?
You seen Idiocracy? Good movie.

Well the information we have collected as a whole may have grown the intelligence of the modern man as an individual is totally up for debate. People believe what they are told and nothing more.

It's not evidence but it is a workable explanation.
Not. Not a workable explanation. You think ancient humans living for centuries is the explanation for why modern humans are smart.

Sorry, but that's beyond stupid.
ericmurphy is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 02:21 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post

BIG. BRAIN.

It's right over your nose, for crying out loud.
I'm just guessing but you think a big brain led to our intelligence right? I think our intelligence or mental use is what led to the big brain. Same idea just backwards.

What you use grows, what you don't atrophies away.
So being intelligent made modern humans have big brains. Sorry, but this is beyond stupid, too.
ericmurphy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.