FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2004, 09:42 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avatar
Take a look at this link:

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/9941/index.html

...and then tell me that religious ecsasty doesn't lead (or is not an indicator of) mental illness.
That's a great link, but it's about wacky end times prophecies, not religious ecstasy as an indicator of mental illness. Most of those end time prophets are just obsessed with incorrect ideas, not in the throes of ecstacy.

A previous generation of scholars casually assumed that religion was a form of mental illness. This approach has fallen out of favor, as religious people have asserted their civil rights, and tolerance is the word of the day.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-16-2004, 09:49 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angyson
I've heard that Paul was a mysogynist. That may have affected his viewson women in his letters.
Paul is not here to defend himself, but you can find different views of women in the letters that are attributed to him. It seems unlikely that he was any more misogynist than the culture he lived in.

In his letters and in the book of Acts, Paul appears to work with women in an egalitarian relationship, and there is one passage in his letters that says, in Christ there is no East or West, no male or female (quoting from memory, so this is not exact).

On the other hand, there are passages in Paul's epistles that call for women to be silent in church and obey their husbands (and for slaves to obey their masters.)

Did the same person write both of these passages? There is enough contradictory material about Paul to make him a hero or a villain in your narrative of early Christianity. He might be a repressed homosexual. He might be the victim of later forgers.

And what does this have to do with mental illness?
Toto is offline  
Old 09-16-2004, 09:59 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

I dunno if the author of Revelation was schizophrenic or not; I'd be more inclined to think that he was experiencing drug induced visions. None of Revelation makes much sense to me I have to say .

I suspect that a lot of the so-called 'demon possession' in the bible was actually schizophrenia though. Sadly, many churches today refuse to recognise mental illness and refer to it as possession.
IamMoose is offline  
Old 09-16-2004, 01:15 PM   #14
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angyson
I was in no way seeking to downgrade the literature in Revelations. But I was wondering if you think the author was schizophrenic. No opinions ?
I submit that it would be impossible to say. Apocalyptic literature was a well defined genre and the apocalypse of john fits well within that framework. It could very well be that John was syphillitic amputee with a hump and a nasty peyote habit, but we really can't say from the text.
CX is offline  
Old 09-16-2004, 01:21 PM   #15
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMoose
I dunno if the author of Revelation was schizophrenic or not; I'd be more inclined to think that he was experiencing drug induced visions. None of Revelation makes much sense to me I have to say .

I suspect that a lot of the so-called 'demon possession' in the bible was actually schizophrenia though. Sadly, many churches today refuse to recognise mental illness and refer to it as possession.
The various categories of schizo-affective disorders are all relatively rare. Still mental illness in general or other types of cognitive disabilities like down syndrome and what have you were undoubtedly treated either as demon possession or punishments from god in antiquity. As to your second suggestion I'd be very interested to know what "many churches" do not recognise mental illness. We ought be careful not to paint with too broad a brush and give too much importance to relatively small sects, such as has happened with the snake handlers of West Virginia.
CX is offline  
Old 09-17-2004, 01:19 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Toto
Quote:
previous generation of scholars casually assumed that religion was a form of mental illness. This approach has fallen out of favor, as religious people have asserted their civil rights, and tolerance is the word of the day.
I am completely in favour of toleration towards people with mental health problems. But there does seem to be relationships between fundamentalism, madness and religious behaviour that ought to be explored, and not avoided because of some false fear of being politically incorrect.

Religion and opium of the people comes to mind. Interesting that nowadays madness is treated with drugs and talking therapies are out of favour.

Cognitive dissonance, continually misinterpreting the world, strange beliefs about miracles and the second coming, speaking in tongues, suicide bombing, looks "mad" to me!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 09-17-2004, 01:25 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Clivedurdle - if it wasn't clear, I agree with you. But the mental health profession in the US at least seems to have been hijacked by believers (at least believers in something) and criticizing anyone's religion is just not done.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-17-2004, 01:27 PM   #18
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Toto

I am completely in favour of toleration towards people with mental health problems. But there does seem to be relationships between fundamentalism, madness and religious behaviour that ought to be explored, and not avoided because of some false fear of being politically incorrect.

Religion and opium of the people comes to mind. Interesting that nowadays madness is treated with drugs and talking therapies are out of favour.

Cognitive dissonance, continually misinterpreting the world, strange beliefs about miracles and the second coming, speaking in tongues, suicide bombing, looks "mad" to me!
Perhaps, but reasonable people can and often do hold unreasonable beliefs. This is not a priori a sign of a diagnosable mental disorder per the DSM IV.
CX is offline  
Old 09-17-2004, 06:17 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: otago newzealand
Posts: 116
Default

It may be a simple case of dehydration, which can cause hallucinations. Here I'm thinking - hot country- not enough fluid intake.
tawa is offline  
Old 09-18-2004, 05:50 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 983
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Too bad psychiatrists can't cast out demons.


Perhaps, if David existed. But the text is firstly literature and must be dealt with accordingly first. Who in the scholarly world believes that a David wrote any of the psalms?


The writer of Revelation is writing in a well-defined genre as also evinced by all the Jewish apocalypses. Revelation is a literary product first and foremost, a product from a world in which visions were not so strange, and a product which has a religious intent.


spin
"too bad psychiatrists cannot cast out demons. Both the Catholic and Pentacostal churches rise up to that challenge.
Angyson is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.