Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-24-2007, 09:21 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
|
02-24-2007, 11:52 AM | #12 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I will always remember Witherington for his defense of the James Ossuary, and his suggestion that DNA evidence from the bone fragments in it could be matched with DNA blood samples from the Shroud of Turin to show that it once held the biological brother of Jesus. |
|||
02-24-2007, 12:23 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
|
|
02-24-2007, 12:30 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Advising against reading Ehrman is, IMVHO, very bad advice, agree or disagree.
Ben. |
02-24-2007, 12:36 PM | #15 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
Please don't be so quick to accuse others of fraud or other sins when you can't even get details like that right. Should I assume that you have been blinded by your own ideological stance? |
|
02-24-2007, 02:34 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
eg. Jerome clearly commented on the Pericope, and was quite fluent in Greek, and even translated from Greek manuscripts (and included the Pericope in the Latin Vulgate, for which he utilized the 'fountainhead', early Greek manuscripts, as well as early Old Latin manuscripts). Yet Jerome is not technically a "Greek father". You see, Toto, there are many tricks in the sleight-of-hand verbiage. And please notice how you lost that snippet (Greek fathers). That is the idea of the Ehrman-esque deceptive presentation (however, he is not the only one, eg. similar is done by Daniel Wallace and the late Bruce Metzger, Ehrman's teacher). So even your partially proper correction is a great example of the results of the deceptive style of writing of Bart Ehrman. The 'devil is in the details', the crafty word-parsed formulations, and especially the details and not-so-details omitted. The result is clearly deceptive and deceitful since the goal is to give an impression not unlike that received by the poster. Hiding piles of manuscript and early writer evidence (oh, internal evidence too). Trying to make the Pericope look like a late middle-ages invention to the unwary, against literally piles of evidence (manuscripts in multiple languages - including many Greek manuscripts in the same period being referenced - as well and many early church writers). This type of deception we run into frequently when folks who read these presentations come back and speak the intended sense that was manipulatively implied. (By the combination of unusual classifications combined with large-scale omissions). Otherwise, thanks on the heads-up. Ehrman on the Pericope Deceptive and deceitful, surely. Fraudulent .. can pass (definitionally viable, but a charged word). Shalom, Steven Avery |
|
02-24-2007, 04:03 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
|
Is that a reference to De Jonge's paper on the Comma?
|
02-24-2007, 04:30 PM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
No, the comparable comment on the Comma .. "No Greek father ..." Shalom, Steven Avery |
|
02-24-2007, 04:34 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
|
|
02-24-2007, 05:07 PM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
However none of that was the thread. We have Greek writer references (and lots of other evidences). Shalom, Steven Avery |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|