FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-24-2009, 10:28 PM   #71
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 136
Default

You know, I noticed that no one dared address this point I made. I wonder why?

Quote:
Pilate also had his reason why he did what he did. He faced an unruly crown that was on the brink of insurrection. He needed to give them something. He honestly thought that they would pick Jesus over Barabbas. However, most of the people in the crowd were there for Barabbas. Since Jesus was arrested early in the morning, nobody knew that the bloodied person standing next to Barabbas was even Jesus. Many of Jesus' supporters weren't even there. And those that were there, were drowned out by the supporters of Barabbas. So it was just an unfortunate circumstance that Jesus could have been release, but because Pilate put it up to the crowd who was there to advocate for the release of Barabbas, things turned out the way they did.

If Pilate would have found reason to execute Jesus, he wouldn't have even bothered putting up the choice of who gets executed or who goes free. He would have just killed both Barabbas and Jesus. But since he knew that Jesus was innocent of all charges, he was hoping that the crowds would have picked Jesus over this murderous Barabbas. How wrong he was.
Why did Pilate even give the choice to the people? He certainly didn't have to. He had all authority to make any choice he seemed fit himself. Why put it up to the crowd? Answer me that!
JABcomix is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 10:57 PM   #72
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JABcomix View Post
You know, I noticed that no one dared address this point I made. I wonder why?

Quote:
Pilate also had his reason why he did what he did. He faced an unruly crown that was on the brink of insurrection. He needed to give them something. He honestly thought that they would pick Jesus over Barabbas. However, most of the people in the crowd were there for Barabbas. Since Jesus was arrested early in the morning, nobody knew that the bloodied person standing next to Barabbas was even Jesus. Many of Jesus' supporters weren't even there. And those that were there, were drowned out by the supporters of Barabbas. So it was just an unfortunate circumstance that Jesus could have been release, but because Pilate put it up to the crowd who was there to advocate for the release of Barabbas, things turned out the way they did.

If Pilate would have found reason to execute Jesus, he wouldn't have even bothered putting up the choice of who gets executed or who goes free. He would have just killed both Barabbas and Jesus. But since he knew that Jesus was innocent of all charges, he was hoping that the crowds would have picked Jesus over this murderous Barabbas. How wrong he was.
Why did Pilate even give the choice to the people? He certainly didn't have to. He had all authority to make any choice he seemed fit himself. Why put it up to the crowd? Answer me that!
This didn't actually happen, you know. It's just a story. The author modeled it on the scapegoat ritual from Leviticus. One goat was sacrificed, the other bore the sins of the people and was sent off into the wilderness. So Jesus the Nazarene was "sacrificed" and Jesus barAbbas bore the sins of Israel and was sent off.

The crowd is just a Greek chorus. You don't think that they exercised any free will, do you?
Toto is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 10:59 PM   #73
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JABcomix View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Urantia is not an accepted source. It is also a made up story. It is not within the purview of this forum.
Well according to Atheist, all scriptures are not accepted sources. So what does it matter where I got it from if you're just going to dismiss it just like you dismiss all religious claims?
This forum is for Biblical criticism - the secular study of the Bible and other Abrahamic texts as literature and as a possible source of history. It is not for the analysis of modern fantasies like Urantia or Scientology.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 11:51 PM   #74
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JABcomix View Post

Well according to Atheist, all scriptures are not accepted sources. So what does it matter where I got it from if you're just going to dismiss it just like you dismiss all religious claims?
This forum is for Biblical criticism - the secular study of the Bible and other Abrahamic texts as literature and as a possible source of history. It is not for the analysis of modern fantasies like Urantia or Scientology.
I am basing my question in the context of the Bible. It is you who is dismissing the story altogether. It says plainly in the Bible that Pilate gave this choice to the public of who should be freed. You still have not answered my question. How are you critical of the Bible when you dismiss the story of Pilate altogether?

Why did Pilate give the crowd the choice to pick who lives or dies? He didn't have to. Answer me that!
JABcomix is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 12:19 AM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Because it makes for a much better scene.
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 12:56 AM   #76
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 136
Default

Denying that it ever happened is not a valid argument to the WHY it happened.

Why did Pilate let the public choose?

Repeating the same answer does not make it true.
JABcomix is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 07:15 AM   #77
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 4,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JABcomix View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

This forum is for Biblical criticism - the secular study of the Bible and other Abrahamic texts as literature and as a possible source of history. It is not for the analysis of modern fantasies like Urantia or Scientology.
I am basing my question in the context of the Bible. It is you who is dismissing the story altogether. It says plainly in the Bible that Pilate gave this choice to the public of who should be freed. You still have not answered my question. How are you critical of the Bible when you dismiss the story of Pilate altogether?

Why did Pilate give the crowd the choice to pick who lives or dies? He didn't have to. Answer me that!
I mentioned this earlier, but you probably didn't see it. In the Matthew account, in the earlier manuscripts, it is found that Barabbas' name is also Jesus. This was later omitted, I assume to avoid confusion, but that is a significant omission if you consider the confusion that may have been felt by the crowd in the story. Jesus BarAbbas (keep in mind that Abba was commonly used as an effectionate name for God), could be roughly tanslated to Jesus the son of God. So the crowd is being offered what? A choice between Jesus the King of the Jews and Jesus the son of God?
Tristan Scott is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 07:26 AM   #78
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Scott View Post
I mentioned this earlier, but you probably didn't see it. In the Matthew account, in the earlier manuscripts, it is found that Barabbas' name is also Jesus. This was later omitted, I assume to avoid confusion, but that is a significant omission if you consider the confusion that may have been felt by the crowd in the story. Jesus BarAbbas (keep in mind that Abba was commonly used as an effectionate name for God), could be roughly tanslated to Jesus the son of God. So the crowd is being offered what? A choice between Jesus the King of the Jews and Jesus the son of God?
Barabbas was a zealot that murdered a Roman guard. Why would Pilate be interested in releasing a murderer? Abba also meant Father. Before Jesus, nobody referred to God as "Father"

Anyway, if you are going down this route, that Barabbas was Jesus. Then you unwittingly put forward my claim that it was the Jewish Sanhedrin that wanted Jesus dead. For if we go down the line of your reasoning, Jesus (or Barabbas) would have been captured by the Jewish Religious Authority, sentenced and then let go by the Roman Authority. The question here was, Why was Jesus killed, and the answer still remains, because the Jewish Sanhedrin wanted him dead.
JABcomix is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 07:39 AM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JABcomix View Post
You know, I noticed that no one dared address this point I made. I wonder why?

Quote:
Pilate also had his reason why he did what he did. He faced an unruly crown that was on the brink of insurrection. He needed to give them something. He honestly thought that they would pick Jesus over Barabbas. However, most of the people in the crowd were there for Barabbas. Since Jesus was arrested early in the morning, nobody knew that the bloodied person standing next to Barabbas was even Jesus. Many of Jesus' supporters weren't even there. And those that were there, were drowned out by the supporters of Barabbas. So it was just an unfortunate circumstance that Jesus could have been release, but because Pilate put it up to the crowd who was there to advocate for the release of Barabbas, things turned out the way they did.

If Pilate would have found reason to execute Jesus, he wouldn't have even bothered putting up the choice of who gets executed or who goes free. He would have just killed both Barabbas and Jesus. But since he knew that Jesus was innocent of all charges, he was hoping that the crowds would have picked Jesus over this murderous Barabbas. How wrong he was.
Why did Pilate even give the choice to the people? He certainly didn't have to. He had all authority to make any choice he seemed fit himself. Why put it up to the crowd? Answer me that!
Like I wrote numerous times, this Pilate is the opposite of the Pilate recorded in history.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philo, On The Embassy of Gaius 38
(299) "Moreover, I have it in my power to relate one act of ambition on his part, though I suffered an infinite number of evils when he was alive; but nevertheless the truth is considered dear, and much to be honored by you. Pilate was one of the emperor's
lieutenants, having been appointed governor of Judaea. He, not more with the object of doing honor to Tiberius than with that of vexing the multitude, dedicated some gilt shields in the palace of Herod, in the holy city; which had no form nor any other forbidden thing represented on them except some necessary inscription, which mentioned these two facts, the name of the person who had placed them there, and the person in whose honor they were so placed there.

(300) But when the multitude heard what had been done, and when the circumstance became notorious, then the people, putting forward the four sons of the king, who were in no respect inferior to the kings themselves, in fortune or in rank, and his other descendants, and those magistrates who were among them at the time, entreated him to alter and to rectify the innovation which he had committed in respect of the shields; and not to make any alteration in their national customs, which had hitherto been preserved without any interruption, without being in the least degree changed by any king of emperor.

(301) "But when he steadfastly refused this petition (for he was a man of a very inflexible disposition, and very merciless as well as very obstinate), they cried out: 'Do not cause a sedition; do not make war upon us; do not destroy the peace which exists. The honor of the emperor is not identical with dishonor to the ancient laws; let it not be to you a pretence for heaping insult on our nation. Tiberius is not desirous that any of our laws or customs shall be destroyed. And if you yourself say that he is, show us either some
command from him, or some letter, or something of the kind, that we, who have been sent to you as ambassadors, may cease to trouble you, and may address our supplications to your master.'

(302) "But this last sentence exasperated him in the greatest possible degree, as he feared least they might in reality go on an embassy to the emperor, and might impeach him with respect to other particulars of his government, in respect of his corruption, and his acts of insolence, and his rapine, and his habit of insulting people, and his cruelty, and his continual murders of people untried and uncondemned, and his never ending, and gratuitous, and most grievous inhumanity.

(303) Therefore, being exceedingly angry, and being at all times a man of most ferocious passions, he was in great perplexity, neither venturing to take down what he had once set up, nor wishing to do any thing which could be acceptable to his subjects, and at the same time being sufficiently acquainted with the firmness of Tiberius on these points. And those who were in power in our nation, seeing this, and perceiving that he was inclined to change his mind as to what he had done, but that he was not willing to be thought to do so, wrote a most supplicatory letter to Tiberius.

(304) And he, when he had read it, what did he say of Pilate, and what threats did he utter against him! But it is beside our purpose at present to relate to you how very angry he was, although he was not very liable to sudden anger; since the facts speak for themselves;

(305) for immediately, without putting any thing off till the next day, [Tiberius] wrote a letter, reproaching and reviling him in the most bitter manner for his act of unprecedented audacity and wickedness, and commanding him immediately to take down the shields and to convey them away from the metropolis of Judaea to Caesarea, on the sea which had been named Caesarea Augusta, after his grandfather, in order that they might be set up in the temple of Augustus. And accordingly, they were set up in that edifice. And in this way he provided for two matters: both for the honor due to the emperor, and for the preservation of the ancient customs of the city.
This same story is retold by Josephus in Jewish War Book 2.8.2-3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josephus, Jewish War 2.9
4. After this [Pilate] raised another disturbance, by expending that sacred treasure which is hundred furlongs. At this the multitude had indignation; and when Pilate was come to Jerusalem, they came about his tribunal, and made a clamor at it. Now when he was apprized aforehand of this disturbance, he mixed his own soldiers in their armor with the multitude, and ordered them to conceal themselves under the habits of private men, and not indeed to use their swords, but with their staves to beat those that made the clamor.

He then gave the signal from his tribunal [to do as he had bidden them]. Now the Jews were so sadly beaten, that many of them perished by the stripes they received, and many of them perished as trodden to death by themselves; by which means the multitude was astonished at the calamity of those that were slain, and held their peace."
Subsequently, Pilate is recalled back to Rome for massacring some Samaritans who went to Mt. Gerizim following a messiah claimant.
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 07:49 AM   #80
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 136
Default

So as you describe him, Pilate was a bad man. The question still remains in the context of this "story" about the sentencing of Jesus, Why would Pilate give the crowd the choice between Jesus and Barabbas? Why not just kill them both? In the context of the story written in the bible, despite whether or not you think it's true, objectively put forward your thoughts as to WHY Pilate would do such a thing as to give the Jewish people a choice when he had the authority all along to just kill both Jesus and Barabbas.
JABcomix is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.