FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2006, 09:42 AM   #51
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Stopping at just the Bible would be a sign of...Christian bias?
Erm, no. I imagine that a protestant Evangelist might well argue that way against the Catholic concept of the Immaculate Conception, but I am an atheist who was raised a Catholic.

No, my reason for stopping at the Bible is that surely extra-biblical stories about Jesus (the Infancy Gospels for instance, and this concept of how his mother came into the world - though that's just an article of faith rather than a story) can already be counted as myth.

Even if I accept that Jesus's life was not significant in drawing up the Raglan list, one major problem with it is its predilection for dealing with the royal aspects of royal heroes. The trouble with this is that kings in real life frequently had many of those attributes, including being either descended from previous Kings or having overthrown the predecessor King themselves - which is pretty much par for the course for any monarch. The incestuous stories of the lives of the Gods were derived from the incestuous antics of real life Kings (the pharaohs of Egypt being an obvious example). And as I said, royalty accounted for 9 out of 22 of the list items!
The Bishop is offline  
Old 09-29-2006, 01:11 PM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bishop View Post
No, my reason for stopping at the Bible is that surely extra-biblical stories about Jesus (the Infancy Gospels for instance, and this concept of how his mother came into the world - though that's just an article of faith rather than a story) can already be counted as myth.
Er, not necessarily. But even so, are they not also to be analyzed in the heroic sense? What's the point of the list if we don't actually utilize it?

And once again, Jesus was literally a king. He was, if you recall, a descendant of David. And as far as incest goes, I repeated a bajillion times how not every hero had incest. Either there's incest, or there's "familial problems" - you can't have it both ways.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-02-2006, 05:41 AM   #53
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Er, not necessarily. But even so, are they not also to be analyzed in the heroic sense? What's the point of the list if we don't actually utilize it?
After long thought, I've decided to concede your point.
The Bishop is offline  
Old 10-02-2006, 11:26 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bishop View Post
After long thought, I've decided to concede your point.
I'm not sure if that's good or bad, considering how much talking out of my ass I've been doing in this thread, but I guess I'll take it.

Also, here's an interesting thread at SVR on heroes.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 05:03 AM   #55
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

This makes me wonder how different Xian apologists have taken comparisons to Lord Raglan's Mythic-Hero profile. C.S. Lewis has the odd argument that such similarities indicate that pagan ones are foreshadowings of Jesus Christ, while Justin Martyr had claimed that such similarities were set up by the Devil to keep people from converting to Xianity ("diabolic mimicry").

The Catholic Church has laid down (First Vatican Council Canon 3.4 here) that
If anyone says that all miracles are impossible, and that therefore all reports of them, even those contained in sacred scripture, are to be set aside as fables or myths; or that miracles can never be known with certainty, nor can the divine origin of the Christian religion be proved from them: let him be anathema.
thus claiming the historicity of some of the stuff that gives Jesus Christ a high Lord Raglan score.

J.P. Holding says in Some notes on alleged parallels between Christianity and pagan religion:
Quote:
The sceptic will typically appeal to the work of Lord Raglan, even though it's now 70 years out of date
Making it much less out of date than the Bible.

Quote:
and a number of different schemas have since been proposed.
Which ones and how do they improve on Lord Raglan's profile?

Quote:
There are serious problems with Raglan: in order to get mythical figures to fit his schema, you often have to cheat quite blatantly; and, in any case, real-life historical figures such as Hitler and Napoleon fit the pattern just as well as the ancient heroes whom he adduced.
This is absolutely laughable. Neither leader fits Lord Raglan's profile very well, though they both fit it a bit better than many well-documented people.

He also says,
Quote:
For instance, the hero will typically have a miraculous conception or birth - but it's hardly legitimate to compare the story of the virgin birth recounted in the Gospels with (say) Zeus' rape of Leda in the form of a swan simply because both involve some sort of supernatural element.
However, divine biological paternity is a shared element in those stories, even if the mechanisms differ.

Quote:
Secondly, where hero-stories do concur, they often concur in ways which question the utility of applying them to the story of Jesus. Incest and parricide are recurrent themes of the schemas, for example,
Although some heroes do indeed kill their fathers or other such relatives (Oedipus, Perseus, Romulus, Krishna), some don't (Hercules, Moses). Incest is also less-than-universal.

Quote:
as is the link between the hero and kingship (you can get out of this by suggesting that Jesus was the heir of King David, or that he heralded the Kingdom of God, but this is just the sort of cheating that drains the schemas of their credibility).
I don't see how that that is cheating, since these profiles are overall averages, and should not be taken absolutely literally. Thus, being a great leader could fit the "king" part. Even so, there's a clear connection between Jesus Christ and literal kingship in the Gospels; Jesus Christ is presented as a successor of King David, and he allegedly claimed to be the king of the Jews.

Quote:
Even Raglan's schema falls down on this point, most obviously because Jesus didn't marry a princess (a motif which appears in other schemas too).
Most other mythic heroes do not have 100% fits either, and Romulus and Moses depart from this part of the profile by marrying commoners.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 07:09 AM   #56
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Now for Winston Churchill, Napoleon Bonaparte, and Adolf Hitler.

J.P. Holding claimed that WC fit very well, though he did not try to calculate WC's score. I will use his biographical details to calculate it.

1. A slight stretch: 1
2. A slight stretch: 1
3. 0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
7. 0
8. Was sent to boarding schools and did a lot of traveling: 1
9. 0
10. 1
11. No triumph over a reigning leader: 0
12. 1
13. 1
14. A bit of a stretch, given the tumult of his career: 1
15. 1
16. 1
17. 1
18. 0
19. 0
20. 1
21. 0
22. 0
His score: 11

Napoleon Bonaparte:

1. A minor aristocrat: 1/2
2. A minor aristocrat: 1/2
3. 0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
7. 0
8. 0
9. He went to military boarding school: 0
10. He moves to France: 1
11. He overthrows the Directorate: 1
12. Josephine certainly qualifies: 1
13. 1
14. His career is one war after another after another: 0
15. The Napoleonic Code: 1
16. Defeats by opponent nations I don't think would count: 0
17. Yes, twice: 1
18. Although the cause of his death is obscure, he had been sick for a few years before: 0
19. 0
20. His children did not succeed him, though a nephew eventually become ruler of France as Napoleon III: 0
21. He was buried, though his remains were moved around: 0
22. 0
Score: 7

Adolf Hitler:

1. Undistinguished ancestry: 0
2. Undistinguished ancestry: 0
3. 0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
7. 0
8. 0
9. 0
10. Goes to Germany after WWI: 1
11. He came to power by first getting some seats in the Reichstag, then exploiting its infamous 1933 fire to get himself additional power: 0
12. He never married, and his longtime girlfriend, Eva Braun, had undistinguished ancestry: 0
13. 1
14. True of the mid-1930's perhaps: 0
15. The Nuremberg Laws: 1
16. His followers stay by his side until overrun by opponent armies: 0
17. He stubbornly holds on to his position to the bitter end: 0
18. He commits suicide: 0
19. In his Berlin bunker: 0
20. He was childless: 1
21. His friends cremated him: 1
22. He has no tombs: 0
Score: 5
lpetrich is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 04:44 PM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Some more scores:

President Abraham Lincoln:

1. Undistinguished ancestry: 0
2. Undistinguished ancestry: 0
3. 0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
7. 0
8. 0
9. We do learn a bit about that: 0
10. He started his political career where his family had moved to (Illinois): 0
11. He beat Democrat Stephen Douglas in 1860, though Stephen Douglas was not James Buchanan's choice as successor: 0
12. His wife Mary Todd came from a slaveowning family: 1
13. 1
14. The Civil War dominated his Presidency: 0
15. The Emancipation Proclamation among others: 1
16. 0
17. 0
18. He was assassinated: 0
19. His theater box was likely elevated: 1
20. 1
21. 0
22. 0
Score: 5

This is a serious version; there is a facetious version which makes him score much higher, but I've been unable to find it online.

President John Fitzgerald Kennedy:

1. Rose Fitzgerald was the daughter of a prominent Boston politician, "Honey Fitz", but JFK was her second child: 1/2
2. Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Sr. was a prominent businessman and political figure: 1
3. 0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
7. 0
8. 0
9. 0
10. He started politics in his home town of Boston, Massachusetts: 0
11. He defeated Richard Nixon in 1960; Nixon had been President Dwight Eisenhower's Vice President for his two terms: 1
12. His wife Jacqueline Lee Bouvier came from a rich family with a long history: 1
13. 1
14. His Presidency was rather tumultuous: 0
15. Though he had some ambitious "New Frontier" and civil-rights plans, he had little success in getting them passed: 1/2
16. 0
17. 0
18. He was assassinated by a lone lunatic: 0
19. In his parade car: 0
20. His children were not quite as successful as he had been: 1
21. 0
22. 0
Score: 6

If one takes into account the controversies about his death, that changes (18) from 0 to 1, increasing his total score to 7.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 05:24 PM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

What about Caesar Augustus?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 06:23 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bede View Post
If anyone could be bothered to do more research, you'd find loads more examples, no doubt. Raglan is bunk, or should I say bollocks, which seems to be the accepted term around here.
His biggest problem is that it's arbitrary, how representative of an actual archetype they are depends on how archetypal one views the traits as being.

I could put together another "hero's scale" without much trouble. One that included Luke Skywalker, Dorothy Gale, Superman and Spiderman as high scorers, for example, would be pretty easy to do, and they're pretty diverse characters. For the icing on the cake, one could get George Washington almost as high a score, as long as one compiled the list with Washington in mind.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 06:26 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
IMO Lord Raglan's List is consciously or unconsciously biased to increase the score of Jesus Christ.
Exactly.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.