Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-04-2009, 12:46 AM | #51 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Some possibilities....
1. Paul had not heard of the Gospel as we know it. 2. The letters attributed to Paul were written by a sect in competition with the sect(s) that wrote the Gospel as we know it, and so intentionally avoided discussion of the Gospel as we know it. 3. Paul wrote nothing of the Gospel, as part of an agreement with the Jerusalem sect. 4. The Gospel was old hat, and Paul wanted to emphasize his spin rather than reiterating what everyone already accepted. 5. "Paul" wrote about someone/something entirely different from the Gospel, and the writings were later absconded by Christians, who put a Jesus spin on them. |
07-05-2009, 04:17 PM | #52 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
It seems to me, in that case, that your conclusion (that it has no significance) is tantamount to a claim that the mythicist argument from Paul's silence is not cogent, which is essentially claiming that historicism is true. It follows from this that if an explanation for a particular silence of Paul's presupposes a historical Jesus, then it assumes your conclusion. |
|
07-05-2009, 07:56 PM | #53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
(3) Paul's silence provides no advantage to either side because it is consistent with both. There is no life about which to speak (MJ) or speaking about the life runs contrary to Paul's interests (HJ). Either way we expect silence and that is what we find. The silence is a wash. Understand? |
|
07-06-2009, 06:35 AM | #54 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
|
07-06-2009, 09:29 AM | #55 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Good luck finding whoever you really want to debate because it clearly isn't my position. You haven't even touched it. :wave: |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|