FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2007, 06:20 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
I am arguing that we are assuming their thought patterns were similar to ours. They were not.
Agreed.

Quote:
Can we look in more detail at these baptisms? What were they thought to achieve?
Well, there's a lot to cover I suppose. Looking at John's gospel (the latest, and with more theological developments):

water:
Quote:
John 1:31 And I [JTB] knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water
Luke says that this water baptism was of "repentance" and for remission of sins, a sort of ceremonial cleansing:

Quote:
Luke 3:3: And he came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins;
spirit:

Quote:
John 1:33: And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.
So, this "spirit" baptism was greater than the water one in some way. The two are played with a bit in John 3.

for fire, let's look at Luke's version:

Quote:
Luke 3:16: John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire
Hmmm ... something bigger still?

Quote:
Luke 12:49-51: I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?
But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!
Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
Sounds like some sort of destructive ordeal -- but for a guy about to be killed, maybe this fits.

So, three of the four Aristotle elements are used here for "baptism". I don't know what it all means, but I'm tempted to think of different stages of psychological initiation for the devotee.

Other thoughts?

Ray
Ray Moscow is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 06:47 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

I am ex Assemblies of God and was baptised in the holy spirit and can still speak with tongues. Classic pentecostal theology is that Holy Spirit and tongues of fire are identical, just different ways of saying same thing, so there are only two baptisms - water and fire. There are arguments about if you need to be baptised in the holy spirit to be saved.

Now is a baptism of earth death? Dust to dust?

And air?

That is heaven isn't it? So this is a complete system based on the four elements. John the Baptist came to baptise in water - somehow incomplete...Jesus death and resurrection joins humanity with the four elements. Clever stuff!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 06:59 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

Quote:
How did they think so that they thought Jesus could heal by spitting on clay and putting it on a blind person's eye,...
This could have been a result of believing that God, as it's told in Genesis, created man from clay.
Cege is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:16 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cege View Post
Quote:
How did they think so that they thought Jesus could heal by spitting on clay and putting it on a blind person's eye,...
This could have been a result of believing that God, as it's told in Genesis, created man from clay.
But that is my point in wanting to create theobiology! There were four elements - earth, air, fire and water. Clay is earth and water, breathe in rauch - air or spirit - and you have life!

Fire is probably directly related to god - holy, pure, consuming, punishing in hell, tongues of fire, the magic of the smith turning ore into knives.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:23 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Fire is probably directly related to god - holy, pure, consuming, punishing in hell, tongues of fire, the magic of the smith turning ore into knives.
Yes, God is a consuming fire -- or sometimes nonconsuming fire, as in the burning bush or in the tongues of flame at Pentecost.

Angels and jinn are made of fire, in Islamic belief.

The earth (clay) element is already there in Adam, who when he received the breath (spirit) of life became a "living soul". Also, the cave theme -- manger birth and cave tomb -- carry the earth motif, too.
Ray Moscow is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:36 AM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Let's look at something using the four element structure.

Quote:
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

2 Now the earth was [a] formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light "day," and the darkness he called "night." And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.

9 And God said, "Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear." And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground "land," and the gathered waters he called "seas." And God saw that it was good.

11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds." And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.

14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth." And it was so. 16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.

20 And God said, "Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the sky." 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth." 23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.

24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.

26 [B]Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
The creationists have caused us to lose the power and symmetry of this very impressive poem, that is clearly built on a sophisticated understanding using the four elements.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 08:06 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

Don't forget that serpents were condemned to eat dust/dirt
Cege is offline  
Old 08-15-2007, 10:39 AM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

And our punishment was to farm.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-17-2007, 05:00 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Could we define clearly how people thought when writing the new testament?

We have examples of new adams, virgin births, resurrections, healing, gods becoming human, kata sarka...

Their beliefs probably had logical flaws, but something us humans are good at is creating structures - what are the structures people are using when writing these ideas?

How did they think so that they thought Jesus could heal by spitting on clay and putting it on a blind person's eye, or they thought the devil could take you to a high mountain etc.

Rejecting all this as mumbo jumbo misses the point - what was their world view that led them to conclude these things were real?

Remember even Darwin knew nothing about genes. The new testament is truly alien and if we are to understand it we must be clear about how they thought.
Rejecting the mumbo-jumbo misses the point, as you say. But it is mumbo-jumbo isn’t it? People who think the blind can be healed with spit and that demons can be put into pigs are steeped in mumbo-jumbo.

There are over seventy verses in the Bible that mention magic and sorcery. You recall of course that the first to visit the newborn savior were the magi, the magicians from the east. The miracles of Jesus were accepted by most otherwise they would not have been used to win converts to the new religion.

It tells us a great deal that it seems the miracles are still accepted by most even today. We might learn a lot about the thinking of the authors of the NT by learning how those who still respond to it think. There is no difference.

Baal
Baalazel is offline  
Old 08-17-2007, 06:52 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
Default

If the theme of this thread is theobiology, it should refer specifically to the biology of the divine beings, like the pagan gods, the heroes, and of course Jesus.

Judea was quite Hellenized at the time of Christ, and had ample contacts with Egypt and other pagan cultures. Christianity reflects a profound pagan influence. The idea of a God-man is prevalent in Egypt. The Hebrew God and his messengers take the shape of men. The Greek gods were both spiritual and biological, an exalted form of men identified with some aspect of nature, but subject to even higher powers like fate. The idea of God the Father (Deus Pater=Jupiter, Zeus) impregnating virgins is common to Greek/Latin mythology, and produced the semidivine heroes, like Hercules, Perseus, Teseus, Eneas. Alexander the Great considered that he was the son of Zeus, which did not conflict with being the biological son of Philip: both sperms would have mixed. The Roman emperors were considered divine. Jesus being the son of God and a Virgin was entirely compatible with current believes.
figuer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.