|
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-01-2006, 10:20 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Amazon Forest - Brazil
Posts: 62
|
What I'm saying is that the definition of SUS in the Ancient Roman Language, is: above and up.
On the other hand, the definition of SUS as swine only can be proven from a Medieval Latin basis. Quote:
|
|
|
|
04-01-2006, 10:28 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 03:35 AM
|
#13 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
|
Oh - the SUSpense! I would have to agree with Chris though. I think he has you well and truly SUSSED CD.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 04:35 AM
|
#14 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 215
|
Hey! So JESUS wasn't really the Messiah's name, but NAZARETH definitely existed!! :cheeky:
(Slight boob there, Chris - the Greeks wrote IHΣOYΣ which is IESOUS of course, not IHSOUS). |
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 08:29 AM
|
#15 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
"(Slight boob there, Chris - the Greeks wrote IHΣOYΣ which is IESOUS of course, not IHSOUS)."
IHSOUS is the transcription for IHΣOYΣ or in miniscule Ιησους. Likewise theta is Q, omega is W, phi is F, psi is Y, chi is X, and xi is C. |
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 08:30 AM
|
#16 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 1,831
|
Quote:
Cicero :wave: PS: Hopefully no misunderstanding here! |
|
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 08:42 AM
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 1,831
|
Wow, I am just realizing that Cicero wrote Medieval Latin!
Funny what we can learn on this thread... Still about words, Crazy I can understand, but why Diamond  Just curious.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 08:45 AM
|
#18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 1,831
|
Would someone be kind enough to tell CD how to prononce the Latin word "sus"...?
And the French "sus"... And the French "sous"... And to translate the Latin "susque deque"... Thank you. |
|
|
|
04-02-2006, 11:15 AM
|
#20 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Amazon Forest - Brazil
Posts: 62
|
MARK and LUKE testified "Id Est"
Quote:
It does not matter what the "Greeks" wrote. The only thing that matters is what Pilate wrote. And Pilate wrote the Latin abbreviation I.E. which means That Is and This Is. The Scriptural form of Id Est, in the Scriptures, is THIS IS There are two witnesses in this case: Mark and Luke. According to the books of Mark and Luke, Pilate did not write the word JESUS, but simply the Scriptural form THIS IS. Even because the falseness "jesus" is a MODERN FORM for the old version-name IESVS that belongs to the beast[doctrine] upon which sits the "holy" Mother prostitute-church Gótica Babilônica Romanesca. The letters "INRI" are initials for the Latin title that Pontius Pilate had written on the plaque. Mark and Luke testified that Pilate wrote "Id Est" which the Scriptural form is THIS IS. I. = I.E.SVS - Id Est SVSpended N. = NAZARENVS R. = REX I. = IVDAEORVM |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
