FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-29-2009, 02:23 PM   #61
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post

Speaking which languge ?
Aramaic. The language The Peshitta was written in, the language Jesus spoke.

Take a look around the Middle East... there are groups of people that STILL live the way they did 2000 years ago. And 50 years ago when Lamsa was writing it was even more so.
Jesus spoke in Aramaic? How could that be?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 02:31 PM   #62
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The discussion of Aramaic is getting a little off topic. Please feel free to start a new thread if you want to discuss the Aramaic question [again].
Toto is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 05:19 PM   #63
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: illinois
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Why a landowner?

I'd estimate that almost all farmers in the Roman world of that period were tenant farmers, and had no actual ownership rights to the land they tilled, even in Judea.

DCH

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post

Why not? Is being the son of a farmer more likely? (he would have had to been a land owner...)
He was a Jew, presumably, which means if he was farmer he was a landowner. If he was a laborer on someone else's farm, he would not have been called a farmer. He would have been called a laborer.
kcdad is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 08:41 PM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

But he wasn't called a "farmer," but "son of a tekton (artisan)." Some peasants (your "farmers") would also work as part time tektons, as would those who had abandoned farming for life as itinerant artisans in the towns and cities.

You will find it unbelievably hard to show that private landholding existed among Jews of Judea or especially in a client kingdom. Land ownership is an emotionally charged issue, and this is reflected in the researches of various scholars. The evidence is contradictory and the terms by which Judeans held rights to land seem to have varied from period to period. Judea and Galilee had been conquered by the Persians and then the Macedonian Greeks. In each case, the conquered land became the legal property of the conquering king. Like Vespasian did upon conquering Judea, the Royal land was let out to tenant farmers. Only the elite classes, who administered the conquered land for that king, received gift land, and even that was conditional, and they also leased it to tenants. The best that could be said was that until its destruction, either Jerusalem or the Jewish temple had land granted to it, which was administered in the traditional manner. The traditional manner was to allot land to the people by tribe, not individual. IIRC, Josephus calls the relationship of the individual farmers to the temple a kind of lease (but I am having trouble locating this reference).

DCH

Lenski, Gerhard E., Power & Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification (or via: amazon.co.uk) (1966;1984)

Kautsky, John H., The Politics of Aristocratic Empires (or via: amazon.co.uk) (1982)

Ste. Criox, G. E. M. de, The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World (or via: amazon.co.uk) (1981)

Habel, Norman C., The Land is Mine: Six Biblical Land Ideologies (or via: amazon.co.uk) (1995)

Pastor, Jack, Land and Economy in Ancient Palestine (or via: amazon.co.uk) (1997) ($115! Make a photocopy)

Fiensy, David A., The Social History of Palestine in the Herodian Period (or via: amazon.co.uk) (1991) ($109! Ditto)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Why a landowner?

I'd estimate that almost all farmers in the Roman world of that period were tenant farmers, and had no actual ownership rights to the land they tilled, even in Judea.

DCH
He was a Jew, presumably, which means if he was farmer he was a landowner. If he was a laborer on someone else's farm, he would not have been called a farmer. He would have been called a laborer.
DCHindley is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 04:14 AM   #65
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didymus View Post
Julio wrote: "It's not something you see every day."

True. Or, for that matter, any day of any year of any millennium.

Ddms
Did I write that? Don't remember, sorry [...?]
Julio is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 06:03 AM   #66
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: illinois
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
But he wasn't called a "farmer," but "son of a tekton (artisan)."
OK... now what is an artisan? Is it a laborer? Is it a tiller of the soil? Masonry, carpentry, clothier, potter... what else?
kcdad is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 07:28 AM   #67
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post
OK... now what is an artisan?
It's someone who originates things. It *can* be a carpenter, but it also can be a blacksmith, a mason, a sculptor, an architect, an author, or even a spiritual entity through whom the world was fashioned by his divine father.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 07:00 AM   #68
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: illinois
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post
OK... now what is an artisan?
It's someone who originates things. It *can* be a carpenter, but it also can be a blacksmith, a mason, a sculptor, an architect, an author, or even a spiritual entity through whom the world was fashioned by his divine father.
how "metaphysical" of you... I am thinking the peasants around Nazareth were referring to Jesus' "spiritual entity" when they called him the son of an artisan.
kcdad is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 08:14 AM   #69
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

It's someone who originates things. It *can* be a carpenter, but it also can be a blacksmith, a mason, a sculptor, an architect, an author, or even a spiritual entity through whom the world was fashioned by his divine father.
how "metaphysical" of you... I am thinking the peasants around Nazareth were referring to Jesus' "spiritual entity" when they called him the son of an artisan.
You are starting with the assumption that there is a historical core to the Gospels.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 06:55 AM   #70
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: illinois
Posts: 688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcdad View Post

how "metaphysical" of you... I am thinking the peasants around Nazareth were referring to Jesus' "spiritual entity" when they called him the son of an artisan.
You are starting with the assumption that there is a historical core to the Gospels.
Wrong. I started with the presumption that the writings exist... I then take into consideration that a lot more writings have existed and still do that are not in accord with or included in the Canon. So I am led to the conclusion that they are based on something someone somewhere experienced and wish to record in writing... could be a dream, a political satire, a comedy, a religious revelation or historical event.
You apparently have started with your presumptions... what were they?

let's try not to be so Rush Limbaugh-Bill O'Reilly and be serious and stay away from black and white conclusions...
kcdad is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.