FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Reload this Page Another piece of evidence for the Darwinists to ignore
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM
Search

 
Page 5 of 7 « First 34 5 67
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2008, 10:34 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over there. No, wait. I'm over here now.
Posts: 4,854
Default
I'm still waiting for him to provide the math that it's impossible for all meats to taste like chicken (Which they don't BTW).
Porky Pine is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:34 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,374
Default
I suppose the OP has grown tired of submitting others' quotes to FSTDT and now wishes us to submit one of his. Cute.

This thread is about 2 seconds away from being shipped to ~E~.
GolfVixen is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:34 AM   #43
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 456
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LampreyMoose View Post
I'm going to guess that this is a disgruntled poster who was given the banhammer not long ago.
If so, then whom? I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case, however.
I'm not sure. IIRC, there used to be a list of banned members somewhere on this forum. I can't seem to find it anymore, if it even existed here in the first place.
LampreyMoose is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:35 AM   #44
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere on the map
Posts: 475
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by drekoguk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox View Post

A quick Google-search would solve that. Plus, where's your evidence that most meats actually taste like chicken?
As an explanation of why unusual meats would taste more like chicken than common alternatives such as beef or pork, different possibilities have been offered. One suggestion is that chicken has a bland taste because fat contributes more flavor than muscle (especially in the case of a lean cut such as a skinless chicken breast), making it a generic choice for comparison. Also, chicken reportedly has lower levels of glutamates that contribute to the "savory" aspect of taste sometimes known as umami; processing or tenderizing other meats would also lower glutamate levels and make them taste more like chicken.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tastes_like_chicken
And you don't see the irony in quoting this?
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:37 AM   #45
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere on the map
Posts: 475
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by LampreyMoose View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox View Post

If so, then whom? I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case, however.
I'm not sure. IIRC, there used to be a list of banned members somewhere on this forum. I can't seem to find it anymore, if it even existed here in the first place.
It's still there, IIRC. If drekoguk receives the banhammer for this, we may find our curiosity satisfied.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:39 AM   #46
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 14
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porky Pine View Post
I'm still waiting for him to provide the math that it's impossible for all meats to taste like chicken (Which they don't BTW).
I'll send the maths to Dembski and he'll calculate a probability for me. But, I bet it will be ASTRONOMICAL!
drekoguk is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:40 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,374
Default
Yep, to ~E~ it goes.

Vixy
GolfVixen is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:40 AM   #48
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere on the map
Posts: 475
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by drekoguk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porky Pine View Post
I'm still waiting for him to provide the math that it's impossible for all meats to taste like chicken (Which they don't BTW).
I'll send the maths to Dembski and he'll calculate a probability for me. But, I bet it will be ASTRONOMICAL!
Astronomical, I say! Look, we got the joke from the first post - there's no need to continue.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:40 AM   #49
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 456
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox View Post
It's still there, IIRC. If drekoguk receives the banhammer for this, we may find our curiosity satisfied.
I found it. For some reason, I find the banned users thread infinitely more amusing than this one.
LampreyMoose is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 10:41 AM   #50
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere on the map
Posts: 475
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by LampreyMoose View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox View Post
It's still there, IIRC. If drekoguk receives the banhammer for this, we may find our curiosity satisfied.
I found it. For some reason, I find the banned users thread infinitely more amusing than this one.
It's pretty amusing, certainly. A good number of "serially-banned user" issues.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
 
Page 5 of 7 « First 34 5 67

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.