Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Zeichman · 04-11-2007, 04:47 PM

gnosis,
The importance of this is worth noting, but such memories do not preclude the possibility that someone may be writing after 70CE with memories before the fall of the Temple still alive. At the very least, it means that signs would probably have been written not long after the 70 CE, if it existed. Determining the extent of SG is quite difficult, too, when compared to the same task when applied to Q.

Doug Shaver · 04-12-2007, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnosis92

Do you think the Signs Gospel, Q, and pre-Markan passion narrative dated before 70CE?

I am aware of no compelling reason to think so.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

04-11-2007, 04:47 PM	#11
Zeichman Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: USA Posts: 562	gnosis, The importance of this is worth noting, but such memories do not preclude the possibility that someone may be writing after 70CE with memories before the fall of the Temple still alive. At the very least, it means that signs would probably have been written not long after the 70 CE, if it existed. Determining the extent of SG is quite difficult, too, when compared to the same task when applied to Q.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.