FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-31-2003, 11:14 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Hazel-rah and Spin,


Thanks for the information.

The connection to "vagrant" seems like a good one if the Abraham/Ivrahim idea isn't viable.

I'm not sure I undertand why the name Eber be used as the source for naming the entire tribe. Do they consider themselves to be the descendants specifically of Shem?

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
You could always also try a source from the Hebrew word for "beyond/across" as in pass across the river.
That seems even better than "vagrant" and maybe even better than "Abraham/Ivrahim". Is the Hebrew word at least close to "ivri"? What is a good online source for this subject?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 12-31-2003, 11:47 AM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, oregon, usa
Posts: 1,190
Default

It was my understanding that the "Hebrew" derived from the Egyptian term for "wandering hoodlums": "apiru". The Hebrews adopted is as a term of honor...

godfry
godfry n. glad is offline  
Old 12-31-2003, 05:20 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by godfry n. glad
It was my understanding that the "Hebrew" derived from the Egyptian term for "wandering hoodlums": "apiru". The Hebrews adopted is as a term of honor...
Yeah, I forgot that one. It's a scholarly construct developed after having found the term habiru/'apiru in Egyptian and Mesopotamian records. It is a theory based on similarity, which doesn't explain why one might have the term used throughout the region, from Northern Syria down to the bottom of Palestine.

The term itself best seems to indicate "outlaws", people on the margins of society and don't quite fit into the idea of "sedentary".

It's not too easy to make the linguistic connection because the word always has a medial "i".

Lastly, as it appears in literature very early -- the Amarna letters for example are from the 14th century BCE and deal with apiru in Palestine --, there doesn't seem to be a way of connecting it to the people we call Hebrews.

I've had a few run-ins with academics who assume it as the source for "Hebrew".


spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 05:50 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
I've had a few run-ins with academics who assume it as the source for "Hebrew".
Haha. Lemche demolished the hab/piru arguments in Prelude to Israel's Past, particularly with its linguistic equivalence to the Sumerian SA.GAZ. What were the academics' response to that? i(v)bri and abiru have the same consonantal root br, so the argument isn't that far-fetched linguistically, and critiques shouldn't arrive from that direction. If, as godfry n. glad suggests, the Hebrews adopted it as a term of honour ("nigger" anyone?), then there is absolutely no evidence for this other than conjecture.

Joel

P.S. What did you think of the forum? I think you'll quite enjoy sparring with DrJim & Brian.
Celsus is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 07:00 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Although I suspect that Magus has already abandoned this thread, let's kick a dead horse, just in case he's still lurking.

For his education (and others), here are some links to pictures of the Sinai. As you can see, it's not the Sahara....

http://www.cameldive.com/sinai-desert-pictures.htm
http://www.ehabweb.net/Sinai_desert.html
http://www.shark-bay.com.eg/Mountains.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/1015/sinpix.htm

Well, my foot is getting tired. But these were just the first few links from searching "sinai desert pictures" in yahoo.
Kosh is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 07:32 AM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus
Haha. Lemche demolished the hab/piru arguments in Prelude to Israel's Past, particularly with its linguistic equivalence to the Sumerian SA.GAZ.
When did he write that? Last time I communicated -- I was going to say a couple of years ago, but I guess it was a little longer -- with him he was still advocating the connection, so I poured scorn on it as linguistic serendipity, but he thought it was the best bet. So, when was the book written?

Did he footnote the SA.GAZ idea to Landsberger or was that his idea?

Quote:
i(v)bri and abiru have the same consonantal root br, so the argument isn't that far-fetched linguistically, and critiques shouldn't arrive from that direction. If, as godfry n. glad suggests, the Hebrews adopted it as a term of honour ("nigger" anyone?), then there is absolutely no evidence for this other than conjecture.
This seems to be the mainstream in my memory. I also would like to hear about scholars' reactions to Lemche. (The last time I exchanged mail with him I was trying to justify my use of Canaanite as a geographical term, which he objected to. Getting language right in these matters is so important so as to eliminiate hidden assumptions.)


spin

Quote:
What did you think of the forum? I think you'll quite enjoy sparring with DrJim & Brian.
It looked pretty neat, although it was just starting up so the traffic wasn't heavy. I have a basic problem in that I have no fixed email, otherwise I would be interested in discussions on HB.

Incidentally, do you know anyone with enough Hebrew knowledge to be able to clue me up on distinguishing between locative and instrumental uses of B-, especially in this context,

YDW$W 'T H-'RC B-SWSYHM ($ = sin/shin, ' = alef, C = tsade)

They threshed the earth on/with their horses

How can one decide if B- is locative or instrumental?

How can any reader decide?

(In early Anglo-Saxon texts the distinction between locative and instrumental was breaking down in this sort of case.)
spin is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 08:03 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
When did he write that? Last time I communicated -- I was going to say a couple of years ago, but I guess it was a little longer -- with him he was still advocating the connection, so I poured scorn on it as linguistic serendipity, but he thought it was the best bet. So, when was the book written?
1996, although the English version came out in 1998.
Quote:
Did he footnote the SA.GAZ idea to Landsberger or was that his idea?
He actually credits it to Hugo Winckler and confirmation in the Hattusas documents (where hab/piru and SA.GAZ are used interchangeably). Unfortunately, he gives no citation of Winckler's work (not even a date! I'd assumed it was old news). See pages 137-141. I think once he accepted the Winckler thesis, he turned on the idea, and indeed nothing more is needed--his other arguments are rather like flogging the above-mentioned horse. Incidentally, for those interested, SA.GAZ probably derives from the Akkadian saggasu, meaning "murderers." Not nice people these hap/biru.
Quote:
This seems to be the mainstream in my memory. I also would like to hear about scholars' reactions to Lemche. (The last time I exchanged mail with him I was trying to justify my use of Canaanite as a geographical term, which he objected to. Getting language right in these matters is so important so as to eliminiate hidden assumptions.)

Definitely. Anyone else got any information? I've only just finished Lemche anyway, so I haven't even begun to look for reactions to it--much too busy these days.
Quote:
It looked pretty neat, although it was just starting up so the traffic wasn't heavy. I have a basic problem in that I have no fixed email, otherwise I would be interested in discussions on HB.
Don't worry about the email problem--just go with something temporary for now. We need more people there.
Quote:
Incidentally, do you know anyone with enough Hebrew knowledge to be able to clue me up on distinguishing between locative and instrumental uses of B-, especially in this context,

YDW$W 'T H-'RC B-SWSYHM ($ = sin/shin, ' = alef, C = tsade)

They threshed the earth on/with their horses

How can one decide if B- is locative or instrumental?

How can any reader decide?

(In early Anglo-Saxon texts the distinction between locative and instrumental was breaking down in this sort of case.)
Sorry, I'm no Hebrew scholar, just a lowly amateur. I have started teaching myself it, but have made little progress, so even if I wasn't a complete ignoramus, I could hardly be an authority. Have you asked Apikorus?

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 08:59 AM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Regarding the connection between Habiru and SA.GAZ:

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus
...in the Hattusas documents (where hab/piru and SA.GAZ are used interchangeably)... for those interested, SA.GAZ probably derives from the Akkadian saggasu, meaning "murderers." Not nice people these hap/biru.
The logic isn't convincing to me. The generic use across the Amarna corpus of letters is "outlaw/outcast", someone at the edge of society or beyond it. One Amarna letter talks of people joining the habiru or becoming them without any direct notion of them being or becoming murderers (but Lemche knows this, reading the stuff in their original language -- a form of Akkadian used by scribes in the Levant). Words can gather connotations in local situations that are not carried across the whole user base. I don't think the usage in Hattusas can be considered applicable to the whole linguistic community. (When the Flinstones song talks about them having "a gay old time", nobody would think that it was a reference to sexual preference. Maybe you can find a simpler clearer example. )

Quote:
Don't worry about the email problem--just go with something temporary for now. We need more people there.
Well, it still is, because I have an internet connection without the email connection -- well, the email is on someone else's computer... Don't I need email to get some sortof confirmation?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 12:58 PM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, oregon, usa
Posts: 1,190
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus


Sorry, I'm no Hebrew scholar, just a lowly amateur. I have started teaching myself it, but have made little progress, so even if I wasn't a complete ignoramus, I could hardly be an authority. Have you asked Apikorus?

Joel
Apikorus...

An excellent suggestion. If he doesn't know, he'll know who does.


godfry
godfry n. glad is offline  
Old 01-01-2004, 07:35 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
The logic isn't convincing to me. The generic use across the Amarna corpus of letters is "outlaw/outcast", someone at the edge of society or beyond it. One Amarna letter talks of people joining the habiru or becoming them without any direct notion of them being or becoming murderers (but Lemche knows this, reading the stuff in their original language -- a form of Akkadian used by scribes in the Levant). Words can gather connotations in local situations that are not carried across the whole user base. I don't think the usage in Hattusas can be considered applicable to the whole linguistic community. (When the Flinstones song talks about them having "a gay old time", nobody would think that it was a reference to sexual preference. Maybe you can find a simpler clearer example. )
Well my understanding of SA.GAZ is that it is a good deal older than Amarna letters, and so may have lost some of its derogatory force over the centuries to mean something along those lines. However, to me the original Akkadian word is obvious enough... Anyway, I think we've sidetracked this topic enough as it is.
Quote:
Don't I need email to get some sortof confirmation?
Not at the moment--there is no user or admin confirmation set at this point,

Joel
Celsus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.