FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2009, 08:36 PM   #111
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ktotwf View Post
Wait, is the association of someone to Australia an insult now?
Well I used the word mate which where I am is a friendly term once in a post but when it gets thrown back at you 5 times in a post and some dig about country of origin and the question dodged then that appears like insult to me.
Transient is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:40 PM   #112
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

Sheshbazzar the only thing that is pathetic and funny is your inability to grasp that a large number of respectable historians support the historical Jesus for good reasons.
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:42 PM   #113
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
The Evidence For Jesus

http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billc...discover2.html

Please guys, read some of this and respond.
Craig is not arguing in that essay for Jesus' historicity. In that essay, he is arguing for the gospels' historical reliability, and his argument assumes Jesus' historicity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by William Lane Craig
if we want any details about Jesus’s life and teachings, we must turn to the New Testament. Extra-biblical sources confirm what we read in the gospels, but they don’t really tell us anything new. The question then must be: how historically reliable are the New Testament documents? [Emphasis added.]
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:44 PM   #114
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
Sheshbazzar the only thing that is pathetic and funny is your inability to grasp that a large number of respectable historians support the historical Jesus for good reasons.
"Good" reasons?
I didn't think that the reasons cited on the pages I followed your links to looked "good". They looked like reasons coming from a preformed position and a desire to maintain that position.
One link refuted what you said completely and backed the complete opposite case to show that no satisfactory evidence exists.

This debate, if you like to call it that, is futile.
Transient is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:44 PM   #115
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
a large number of respectable historians support the historical Jesus for good reasons.
You say so. Try proving it. Tell us what those good reasons are.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:44 PM   #116
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East of ginger trees
Posts: 12,637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
Because the Christ myth theory is not accepted by mainstream critical scholarship. It's really very simple.
That doesn't really answer my question. Why are you so worked up about proving us wrong? (Yes, I'm a MJer myself. No, I'm not a scholar.)
Barefoot Bree is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:50 PM   #117
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

Yes your not a scholar, you will never be a scholar, you dont need to be a scholar. But what you need to do is to explain how a theory that has a very limited acceptance in relevant scholarly circles and is opposed by nearly all historians, is something you find no difficulty supporting.
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:53 PM   #118
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

You don't find it difficult because you don't care, none of you people care.
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:53 PM   #119
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East of ginger trees
Posts: 12,637
Default

Care about what, exactly?
Barefoot Bree is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:55 PM   #120
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

The truth
TimBowe is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.