FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2006, 12:42 AM   #221
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

especially considering that Numbers 1 arrives at 603,550 (with breakdown by tribe) and Numbers 26, for the census some 38 years later at 601,730. Because I know the interpretation that has 'elef' mean 'family', but that does not work with the two censi in Numbers.
Anat is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 02:13 AM   #222
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bfniii
two different people can look at the same artifact and draw different conclusions. that includes people from different times. my point is that it is presumptuous, at this time, to state that the remains contradict the biblical account no matter how exemplary Nigro and Marchetti's work may have been.
Why is it "presumptuous"? What's so special about the Bible, that it would be "presumptuous" to contradict it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfniii
no, there is a difference between impossible and difficult. some people have never taken the time to analyze the scenario and try to visualize that their misconceptions stem from unwarranted assumptions and personal conjecture based on an opposing worldview. they just assume that if the bible says it, then it couldn't have happened.
Ad-hominem and projection.

There is no "atheist religion" with a commandment that states "Thou Shalt Deny The Exodus". There is nothing inherently supernatural about the migration of a large number of people (I've never seen anyone deny that the Babylonian Captivity happened, for instance).

It's just that some people base their conclusions on the evidence, whereas others are ideologically opposed to doing so.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 06:34 AM   #223
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

C'mon, bfniii... Show us your numbers.
xaxxat is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 07:18 AM   #224
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Bfniii, lets assume God did cause those plagues, by what means did the magicians turn all the water of Egypt into blood, by what means did the magicians infest Egypt with frogs. Which God helped them to do those acts?

The story of the plagues, as recorded in Exodus, is an illusion. If God is having competition with illusionist, then he must have been created by an illusion. It is conceivable that such nonsense as the plagues could have occurred based on archaelogical findinds and the Bible itself.s
aa5874 is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:20 AM   #225
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bfniii
there are various interpretations of the words that delineate the numbers of the people.
Addressed here:

http://www.theskepticalreview.com/BPNumbersGame1.html
MiddleMan is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 11:36 AM   #226
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
Bfniii, lets assume God did cause those plagues, by what means did the magicians turn all the water of Egypt into blood, by what means did the magicians infest Egypt with frogs. Which God helped them to do those acts?

The story of the plagues, as recorded in Exodus, is an illusion. If God is having competition with illusionist, then he must have been created by an illusion. It is conceivable that such nonsense as the plagues could have occurred based on archaelogical findinds and the Bible itself.s
The last sentence should have read, ' It is inconceiveable that such nonsense as the plagues could have occurred based on archaeeological findings and the Bible itself.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 05:19 PM   #227
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

bfniii... quit dodging and show us your numbers.
xaxxat is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 06:08 PM   #228
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burlington, Vermont
Posts: 5,179
Default

I'm rather fascinated by the claim that the Habiru (Freebooters, not necessarily proven to be the Hebrews) "built some impressive structures in Egypt." Where are these structures? How is it known that they were built by the Habiru?
EthnAlln is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 06:30 PM   #229
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Because of the distinctly non-Hebrew Egyptian hieroglypics on them, I guess.

(you really have to understand bfniii to figure it out)

I am feeling somewhat dizzy. Off to bed.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 06:40 PM   #230
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EthnAlln
I'm rather fascinated by the claim that the Habiru (Freebooters, not necessarily proven to be the Hebrews) "built some impressive structures in Egypt." Where are these structures? How is it known that they were built by the Habiru?
I missed the line about building stuff in Egypt. Habiru??? Where did this whacko idea come from?

The only information relating Egypt and the Habiru are the Amarna letters. They clearly show that the Habiru were in Palestine, not Egypt.

I think we ought to put a dunce's cap on the one who came up with this outlandish clanger.

----

While we are here, the Habiru in Palestine mentioned in the Amarna letters date to the reigns of Amenhotep III, Akhenaten, Smenkhkare and Tutankhamen. Most people who advocate the exodus need to put it some generations later, because the Hebrews were mentioned in relation to the city of Raamses a place whose name didn't even exist at the time of the Amarna letters, but is named after Ramses II. We have Habiru making a scene in Palestine and further north, while supposedly the Hebrews were still in Egypt.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.