![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2008 
				Location: The Beast Coast 
				
				
					Posts: 217
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			How often do you hear someone defend a sordid statement, act, or command in the Bible by telling you to read the context? At what point does the apologist go full meta - the way a rationalist usually does - and say "Well if you consider it in the context of the culture of the people who wrote the Bible, then it makes perfect sense that they would stone homosexuals"? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	For example, Acts 3:23 declares that all who do not accept Jesus "shall be destroyed from among the people." I can kind of see this being read to mean "cut off" or "exiled," but still, I'm sure it has been interpreted more often to mean that non-believers should be killed.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2008 
				Location: Myjava, Slovakia 
				
				
					Posts: 384
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			First of all, I don't think early Christians by time of composition of Acts (late 1st/early 2nd century) were in position to kill anybody for belief.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2008 
				Location: The Beast Coast 
				
				
					Posts: 217
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Also worth bringing up: 2 Corinthians 6:14-17 says non-believers should be shunned. Deuteronomy 17:6-10 says they should be killed. Matthew and Luke say love your enemy. Even discounting Deuteronomy for the traditional "The Old Testament doesn't count!" bit, I'm told to read 2 Corinthians "in context" to avoid a contradiction. Huh?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Junior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2008 
				Location: vienna 
				
				
					Posts: 74
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I'd just kindly ask them in what context, and how they think that would change the meaning?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Falls Creek, Oz. 
				
				
					Posts: 11,192
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2008 
				Location: Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 2,305
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 The bias against homosexuality could be seen as the flip of encouraging families and numerical security. One theory I've heard is that the Hebrews brought an essentially Bedouin desert morality into a more urbanized context (Canaan).  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |