FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2005, 06:32 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 14
Default

I had always believed a day was 1,000 years at that time in history, If that be the case then Adam died within that day at 930 years.
jackie lee is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 06:44 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: christchurch new zealand
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackie lee
I had always believed a day was 1,000 years at that time in history, If that be the case then Adam died within that day at 930 years.
Another I have heard is 'a day is as a thousand years for god' This could be used to say that a day is a really long time for god, but not any specific length.
Therese is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 06:59 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

There is no indication that Adam and Eve were immortal before they ate of the apple.

The serpent was correct they did not die but their eyes opened and they knew good and evil like the Gods. This was confirmed by the Gods themselves.
So the serpent was truthful about what would happen and God wasn't.

Adam and Eve were already mortal and if they had eaten of the tree of life they would have become immortal.
NOGO is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 07:04 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Therese
Another I have heard is 'a day is as a thousand years' This could be used to say that a day is a really long time for god, but not any specific length.
BTW thanks to everyone for the posts and information.

I wonder how anyone can justify this type of usage. Doesn't the Bible also give examples of people's lives? If we're using 1,000 (or whatever) of our years as "one day", then shouldn't some of the patriarchs still be alive?

I know...I'm sure the argument is that it is "day=1,000+ yrs" only when referring to god, or when he speaks. Although it makes me wonder why he (omnipotent that he is) would speak to these humans in terms they would not understand, nor why the lifespan reduction reported by the recorders should drop so slowly. Seems to me that if the Fall is responsible for all bad things, then a thousand-year lifespan sure doesn't seem bad to me (considering the ages that some of them had kids, I doubt they were old and infirm for 800+ years). Can I be cursed like that? A couple-hundred years of youth would sure be punishment for me. :wave:
badger3k is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 07:06 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOGO
There is no indication that Adam and Eve were immortal before they ate of the apple.

The serpent was correct they did not die but their eyes opened and they knew good and evil like the Gods. This was confirmed by the Gods themselves.
So the serpent was truthful about what would happen and God wasn't.

Adam and Eve were already mortal and if they had eaten of the tree of life they would have become immortal.
I forget the book (or books) I read this in, but that myth does have some similarity to an Egyptian myth (although in that case, gaining morality was a good thing). At least, that's what I read. I have to admit I am not too familiar with Egyptian mythology (I went more for the archaeology and only surface mythology), so I can't say if there is a myth like this. I'm sure if nobody is familiar with this I can try and look it up, if needed.
badger3k is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 07:51 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 14
Default

I believe since Adam and Eve disobeyed our years were cut short also.
The reason is sin from my understanding. :devil1:
jackie lee is offline  
Old 06-21-2005, 03:45 AM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
en 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

1Ki 2:37 For it shall be, [that] on the day thou goest out, and passest over the brook Kidron, thou shalt know for certain that thou shalt surely die: thy blood shall be upon thine own head.
Are these written by the same author?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-22-2005, 07:15 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOGO
There is no indication that Adam and Eve were immortal before they ate of the apple.
.
Well there is an indication that they were not mortal though, that being that they would suffer death.
I think the only way to make sense of it is that were neither mortal (destined to die) or immortal (unable to die).

They would have been capable of death but need not have died. Augustine may be the one who articulated this view earliest.

The original immortals
judge is offline  
Old 06-22-2005, 10:37 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

I see the liberal interpretation of this passage as just another example of believers interpreting when it suits them while they take Genesis literally in other cases.
Joan of Bark is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.