Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-28-2012, 11:17 AM | #51 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
Quote:
What this person is doing is flooding the forum with "quotes" from the Memar Marqah, the Samaritan version of the Torah, and insulting people for not following his incoherent sectarian bubble. |
||
02-28-2012, 11:20 AM | #52 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2012, 12:16 PM | #53 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I'm abusing the forum by rejecting it's unfounded cynicism? why does a discussion of parallels between Clement and Marqe need to go through the sewer of uninformed hatred and bigotry? the thread is not another in the endless series of "here's why the bible sucks" which pervades the forum. Sorry but the world is not in black and white
|
02-28-2012, 12:49 PM | #54 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
so far i tried to debate "only" and you made personal attacks. the script you posted was not written by or for anything but hebrews. Quote:
you havnt hit any cynicism you havent brought on yourself. You have made a statement not supported by the poeple who wrote the scripture |
||
02-28-2012, 01:18 PM | #55 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
why then do you post comments in a thread that is incompatible with your uninformed speculation about the Pentateuch? This is not a thread which reinforces the notion that 'it's all bullshit.' So why bring the 'it's all bullshit' argument to a thread about the parallels between Clement and Marqe? You have nothing to add nor any knowledge about either Clement or Marqe. Why then promote your agenda rather than participate in the usual threads which are more suited to your ignorance level? The kind of comment which would be appreciated here is one which either (a) acknowledges that there are parallels and advances other lines of argument or (b) argues against the claim of parallels.
|
02-28-2012, 01:25 PM | #56 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
eg: Quote:
|
|||
02-28-2012, 01:26 PM | #57 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
You see? This is an intelligent person who adds illumination to the discussion rather than trying to bring everything down into the gutter. I don't agree with Mr. Criddle on every issue but my respect for him is beyond compare.
Thank you Andrew. You enrich the forum by your continued participation here. |
02-28-2012, 01:31 PM | #58 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
It has nothing to do with intelligence! And going back again to Against Heresies makes people puke!!!
|
02-28-2012, 01:38 PM | #59 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
You dont know the first thing about me to make any poor generalizations due to your ignorance on how I feel about the first 5 books as I havnt discussed my position here. YOUR clueless pull your head out, your not all that, and im not a myther. there is a difference between both books but more importantly how there interpreted. Ancient hebrews didnt write about the heafter in that script no matter how much you let your imagination get to it. Clement and Marqe is one thing, but when you make claims your hiney cant cash concerning modern scholarships, you fail. |
|
02-28-2012, 01:41 PM | #60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|