FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-19-2004, 07:49 AM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Tethys Sea
Posts: 369
Default Jewish Apocalyptic Literature

Were not the DSS full of apocalyptic stuff with the "Son of Righteousness" coming to punish the evildoers and destroy the earth? That seems to ring a bell in my memory. The Essenes were sitting in Qumran at the same time as the alleged events in the gospels. I'm sure there have been connections made between their literature and that of early Christians. Who is to say that Jesus, if he even existed, wasn't trekking out to the Dead Sea (being tempted by Satan "in the wilderness" on the way) soaking up their theology and eschatology?
Epictetus is offline  
Old 10-19-2004, 09:06 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
If you can get around their classical Christian presuppositions, this project approaches the question a little differently by arguing that Revelation is not "apocalyptic"; rather, it is a comedy (yes, in the Aristotelian sense).


CJD
By that, do you imply the supposition that John, the "beloved," the apostle, wrote both the 4th gospel and Revelation? B/c that seems to be assumed as I read the beginning of your link. Odd, since I understand one is written in elegant good Greek, the other--not so much.
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 10-19-2004, 10:05 AM   #13
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Yes, the authors of that project think that the son of Thunder wrote both the gospel and the Revelation (and the three letters, no doubt). This would be within the parameters of "classical Christian presuppositions." But so would thinking that while the gospel and the three letters are authored by the same person, the Revelation was not (e.g., John the seer).

I am sure they have as their reasons all the standard arguments (nothing new there). Note that single authorship is very important to their project in that their whole hermeneutic seeks to show that "like an elaborately detailed oriental tapestry, John's Gospel and Revelation are intricately interwoven to present a composite picture, epic in scope and immortal in theme" (first sentence, part 1). Like I said, they are approaching the question a little differently.

As for the possible influence of sectarian Judaism on the writing; I think that is entirely plausible. But the two are not mutually exclusive. That is, I suppose it is not unthinkable that a first-century hellenistic Jew convinced of the validity of a certain Jewish sect would employ the classical poetics of comedy.

Regards,

CJD
CJD is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 04:26 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Chili's digression has been split off here.

This is intriguing:

Interiview with Elaine Pagels
Quote:
What are you working on now, and is there one question about early Christianity you'd like to answer?

I hardly dare tell you what I'm thinking about doing. I'm not sure I should say. I want to write about the Book of Revelation, a book that's especially powerful right now. Where did this book come from? Why was this one chosen to be in the New Testament? What other revelation writings were available at the time? What was meant by the word "revelation"?

I'd loved to know more about the distribution of the various gospels. Who read them and where. I want to know how this, you might say very unlikely, Christian movement became an extraordinarily powerful global religion.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 07:19 PM   #15
RTS
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 86
Default

For me personally, this webpage/website has answered most of my questions concerning this topic:

http://www.revelationjesuschrist.com/why-written.htm
RTS is offline  
Old 10-23-2004, 08:50 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

That was an educational article, RTS, thank you. I take it, it is just an introduction to a book?

Chili, a request. Please go back to your own split thread and don't muck this one up with your semi-theological wanderings. It gets old.

Thank you.
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 04:48 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 430
Default

I think it was neo-Marcionism at the core. Written as a revelation about the destruction of Jerusalem, to showcase this event as divine proof of the inferiority of the Jewish demiurge.
Casper is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 06:04 PM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Chili' diversions have been moved to the separate thread.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 06:57 PM   #19
RTS
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magdlyn
That was an educational article, RTS, thank you. I take it, it is just an introduction to a book?
Yes, there are actually 2 books written by Daniel Gleason concerning Gematria/Isopsephia and Sacred Geometry in the Bible. The first book is at http://jesus8880.com/homepage.htm . I do not have either book, and I have only read the material online, but I do find his research and conclusions to be very interesting and quite compelling. The ancient royals who wrote the mind virus a.k.a. the Bible were more than just a cult of barefoot fishermen, that's obvious.
RTS is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.