FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2005, 08:39 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,780
Default

Johnny, the true miracle would be to piss on a concrete wall and not leave a mark like that.

Cheers,

Naked Ape
Naked Ape is offline  
Old 04-22-2005, 08:43 PM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
you might show a little grace on figures of speech, man. in the meantime, i will try to work on the precision of my speech. there are no, nor never will be "final nails" for me as long as i can think.
You may wish to less condescending to the sheep of your flock.



But Yes, I will try to show more grace towards you in the future.

All the best
judge is offline  
Old 04-22-2005, 08:46 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace
Yes, and that can be metaphorically said of all humans, but it hardly makes a tall tale any closer to a reality.
Yes my argument (if one can call it that) is not strong. But is it really any weaker than this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace
Paul missed a whole bunch of stuff that one would think worthy of mention to challenge a crowd to think about from the recent past. .
So one thinks paul should have mentioned this. Maybe maybe not. :huh:
judge is offline  
Old 04-22-2005, 09:41 PM   #44
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naked Ape
Johnny, the true miracle would be to piss on a concrete wall and not leave a mark like that.

Cheers,

Naked Ape
:rolling: i dont know if im rolling cuz im drunk or youre a damn funny guy!!!!!!
Johnny Scholar is offline  
Old 04-22-2005, 09:44 PM   #45
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge
You may wish to less condescending to the sheep of your flock.
good point. i think i am more upset with my former fundamentalist self than anything. of non-thinkers, i was the chief of sinners. maybe i dont give them enough credit.
Johnny Scholar is offline  
Old 04-22-2005, 10:37 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Central Valley of California
Posts: 1,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
I guess what I want to say more than anything is that since we have the capacity to think critically about these things we ought to do so. I understand how strong a hold religion has on the human mind, because I was once (and still am at times) gripped by its allure. 1 Thessalonians 5:21 says, “Challenge everything; keep what is good.� That’s my own personal translation, of course, but the truth is there. I, for one, refuse to stay in a flock of mindless sheep.
Hmm... what you might do would require some extra work. Independantly from your required bible readings, you could do some talks about the importance of questioning one's beliefs to weed out the weak ones, and how thinking critically is the surest way to keep from being led astray by foul tempters. Maybe add something about how one should always keep an open mind, to avoid missing revelations because they don't agree with what you assumed so far. If you're really feeling evil, do a speech on doublethink: how two people might both claim to believe something neither believe in, because they're afraid the other will reject them for not believing, however ridiculous the belief. Or on how easy it is to claim a false belief because you're expected to be that way. It's hard branding yourself as a hypocrite, but might be a necessary evil at this point.

And yeah... my commendations to you. That's gotta be a disenheartening situation to be in. At least you're learning first hand how immoral unbelievers can act like believers and sway huge crowds to their bidding. Of course moral atheists can't do that out of their conscience, but people like certain Presidents of certain nations seem to have no problem converting to evangelical Christianity when they think it'll get them more votes. Because you can stand before an audience of people and say, "I have a firm belief in God, and the bible is the truth." when you know better than to believe in either one. And your audience will take your words to heart.
starling is offline  
Old 04-22-2005, 11:31 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
good point. i think i am more upset with my former fundamentalist self than anything. of non-thinkers, i was the chief of sinners. maybe i dont give them enough credit.
Yeah the more and more I go on I find fundametalism offensive but I am such a sceptic at heart at times and so stubborn that I don't necessaily accept infidel ideas either.

At least I can get this stuff out of my system here.
judge is offline  
Old 04-23-2005, 07:12 AM   #48
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Default another response from christiananswers.net

Critical claim: The idea of a virgin birth was mythologically derived.

christiananswers.net says: Author Patrick Campbell (The Mythical Jesus) and Episcopal Bishop J.S. Spong are two of a number of individuals who have suggested that "...the virgin birth account [is a]...clearly recognized mythological element in our faith tradition whose purpose was not to describe a literal event but to capture the transcendent dimensions of God in the earthbound words and concepts of first-century human beings."

Both men, however, overlook a simple fact: No respectable Jew would have ever condescended to buy into a Greek/Babylonian mythological base for an account dealing with the birth of his/her Messiah.


johnny scholar's comment: virtually no respectable jew ever did buy it. the first-century christians were all nonrespectable jews.
Johnny Scholar is offline  
Old 04-23-2005, 08:19 AM   #49
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
Critical claim: The idea of a virgin birth was mythologically derived.

christiananswers.net says: Author Patrick Campbell (The Mythical Jesus) and Episcopal Bishop J.S. Spong are two of a number of individuals who have suggested that "...the virgin birth account [is a]...clearly recognized mythological element in our faith tradition whose purpose was not to describe a literal event but to capture the transcendent dimensions of God in the earthbound words and concepts of first-century human beings."

Both men, however, overlook a simple fact: No respectable Jew would have ever condescended to buy into a Greek/Babylonian mythological base for an account dealing with the birth of his/her Messiah.


johnny scholar's comment: virtually no respectable jew ever did buy it. the first-century christians were all nonrespectable jews.
Mreover, none of those 1st century Jewish-Christians ever heard of the Virgin Birth anyway. That was a late 1st century invention of Matthew's and it was sold to Gentile converts, not Jews.

I see this a lot in apologetics. They don't seem to realize that most of the Christian Myth was created by pagans, not Jews, and that Pauline Christianity never really found a Jewish audience.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 04-23-2005, 08:42 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
Critical claim: The idea of a virgin birth was mythologically derived.

christiananswers.net says: Author Patrick Campbell (The Mythical Jesus) and Episcopal Bishop J.S. Spong are two of a number of individuals who have suggested that "...the virgin birth account [is a]...clearly recognized mythological element in our faith tradition whose purpose was not to describe a literal event but to capture the transcendent dimensions of God in the earthbound words and concepts of first-century human beings."

Both men, however, overlook a simple fact: No respectable Jew would have ever condescended to buy into a Greek/Babylonian mythological base for an account dealing with the birth of his/her Messiah.


johnny scholar's comment: virtually no respectable jew ever did buy it. the first-century christians were all nonrespectable jews.
One issue is that the alleged parallels between the Gospels and Greek and other myths are not all that close.

The pagan myths mostly seem to be stories about a woman supposedly becoming pregnant after having sexual relations with a God or daimon or something like that.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.