FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-25-2010, 10:33 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidbach View Post
I am (half-heartedly) runnunig a campaign to have Revelation replaced by King Lear.

David.
Personally, I'd go with Titus Andronicus, but King Lear's good. Sign me up.
ChristMyth is offline  
Old 05-25-2010, 09:30 PM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristMyth View Post
1. Some people will see what's actually in their so called holy book and end up rejecting the whole bit.
They don't even have to reject the "whole bit". Rejecting the literal "every word is true" interpretation for something closer to Mark Twain's view ("It is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies.") would be good.
Derec is offline  
Old 05-25-2010, 09:39 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnet View Post
From what little I've studied about it, Revelation was a polemic against Rome written for a certain audience and using apocryphal style to get points across without the author ending up dancing on the end of a Roman spear.
It is so obviously a polemic against Rome from reference to 7 hills to "Neron Kaisar" as the Beast. But it also has a lot of interpretation of Jewish scriptures such as Daniel, Ezekiel and Isaiah.
Derec is offline  
Old 05-25-2010, 10:33 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derec View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristMyth View Post
1. Some people will see what's actually in their so called holy book and end up rejecting the whole bit.
They don't even have to reject the "whole bit". Rejecting the literal "every word is true" interpretation for something closer to Mark Twain's view ("It is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies.") would be good.
I agree. I keep hoping that a more liberal Christianity will emerge leaving fundamentalism in a distant past. I can go along with some of what the liberal Christians teach. Its the fundies that scare me.
ChristMyth is offline  
Old 05-25-2010, 10:43 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: look behind you...
Posts: 2,107
Default

I think the book of revelation is actually three separate manuscripts, (later compiled) all of which lament against occupations of Judea.
If taken literally, Jesus should have returned by that summer and vanquished the Romans.
OLDMAN is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.