Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-25-2010, 10:33 AM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,055
|
|
05-25-2010, 09:30 PM | #22 |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
|
They don't even have to reject the "whole bit". Rejecting the literal "every word is true" interpretation for something closer to Mark Twain's view ("It is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies.") would be good.
|
05-25-2010, 09:39 PM | #23 |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
|
It is so obviously a polemic against Rome from reference to 7 hills to "Neron Kaisar" as the Beast. But it also has a lot of interpretation of Jewish scriptures such as Daniel, Ezekiel and Isaiah.
|
05-25-2010, 10:33 PM | #24 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
|
|
05-25-2010, 10:43 PM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: look behind you...
Posts: 2,107
|
I think the book of revelation is actually three separate manuscripts, (later compiled) all of which lament against occupations of Judea.
If taken literally, Jesus should have returned by that summer and vanquished the Romans. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|