FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2004, 11:53 PM   #161
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 979
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
You can read the laws... Do not murder. Do not steal. Do not commit adultery. Do not commit fornication. Do not covet. Unless you are illiterate, He did give a means of figuring them out.
1) That's it? The Bible would be an awfully verbose way of laying out five laws.
2) How exactly am I to know that those are The Laws?
3) What if I am illiterate? Sure, I could learn to read, but I might die before I can read that. Oh dear. Should I just trust somebody who tells me that the words mean "Give half your money to my church"?
Tenek is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 11:55 PM   #162
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ad Astra
The Bible, right? Please provide evidence that the Bible is the work of you god. Thanks.

Err, sorry about the successive posts.
Please provide evidence that the "Origin of Species" is the work of Darwin.

Tenek complained that God didn't give a way to determine the laws. God actually did give a way to determine the laws. Its your issue if you don't trust those laws.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 11:56 PM   #163
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
I didn't expect that it would be. Most walls are more receptive than you.
Right back atcha. By the way, what was that you said earlier about subtle insults? Tsk, tsk, what would Jesus say?

Quote:
Lets just agree to not reply to each other anymore, k?
You're free not to reply to whatever you please, but I get a kick out of this!
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 11:57 PM   #164
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Please provide evidence that the "Origin of Species" is the work of Darwin.
When someone threatens you with eternal torture for not believing every word that Darwin wrote, I will.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 11:59 PM   #165
Ad Astra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Please provide evidence that the "Origin of Species" is the work of Darwin.
Magus, you can't just evade requests, even really hard ones.

Quote:
Tenek complained that God didn't give a way to determine the laws. God actually did give a way to determine the laws. Its your issue if you don't trust those laws.
I'll trust them when I get a chance to have a discussion with God regarding those laws. Not to hard of a request for the almight, is it? Could you please put him on the line for us? Thank you.
 
Old 06-07-2004, 12:00 AM   #166
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenek
1) That's it? The Bible would be an awfully verbose way of laying out five laws.
2) How exactly am I to know that those are The Laws?
3) What if I am illiterate? Sure, I could learn to read, but I might die before I can read that. Oh dear. Should I just trust somebody who tells me that the words mean "Give half your money to my church"?
1) There are more than 5 laws. And the bible is verbose? You are aware how many laws The U.S has and how many books contain those laws correct? We have these schools that require massive amounts of study to even gain knowledge of the basics of our law system. The Bible is a lot easier to determine the laws from than trying to learn all the U.S laws.

2) The laws are there to protect us for the most part. You're welcome not to trust them, but breaking them can lead to pretty devastating consequences.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:01 AM   #167
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 6,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Um, agnostic is no more like atheism, than theism is. Secular humanism doesn't require being an atheist. And there is also the "etc.". You can technically be nonreligous and still believe in God. I'd probably put Einstein in this category. He certaintly wasn't atheist, but He hardly acted religious either.
Deism is hardly Christianity, however.

I am an atheist and my views of things could be easily summed up with secular humanism. Those two things are very easily compatable, as if there is no god running things from behind the curtain, then it is only humans, and so they ought to be valued rather than proclaimed as hopelessly flawed, evil, and imperfect. Sure, we ain't anywhere near perfect, but so far we're the best and most moral kind of intelligence out there, so we ought to at least try to improve ourselves.

And I really ought to type faster. Dang multitasking...
Hyndis is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:02 AM   #168
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ad Astra
I'll trust them when I get a chance to have a discussion with God regarding those laws. Not to hard of a request for the almight, is it? Could you please put him on the line for us? Thank you.
So you can't trust that Do not murder is a good law to keep in place?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:03 AM   #169
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 979
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Please provide evidence that the "Origin of Species" is the work of Darwin.

Tenek complained that God didn't give a way to determine the laws. God actually did give a way to determine the laws. Its your issue if you don't trust those laws.
Well for starters, the book's author is listed as Charles Darwin. This may seem rather simple but compare to the various books of the Bible. Not a one of them seems to be signed by God. IIRC a fifth or so are Paul's letters.

Secondly, Charles Darwin was credited with being the naturalist on a ship which explored around Galapagos. Ideas in the book appear to have been taken from the experience of someone in that region.

Thirdly, the claim here (Darwin wrote a book) is not a stretch. Massive conspiracies aside, the burden of proof should clearly be on the shoulders of one denying that Origin was authored by Darwin.
Tenek is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:04 AM   #170
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyndis
Deism is hardly Christianity, however.

I am an atheist and my views of things could be easily summed up with secular humanism. Those two things are very easily compatable, as if there is no god running things from behind the curtain, then it is only humans, and so they ought to be valued rather than proclaimed as hopelessly flawed, evil, and imperfect. Sure, we ain't anywhere near perfect, but so far we're the best and most moral kind of intelligence out there, so we ought to at least try to improve ourselves.

And I really ought to type faster. Dang multitasking...
Did i ever say improving ourselves is a bad thing? Being a sinner doesn't make you unimprovable. Thats one of the missions of life that Christians pursue. To become better and more Christ-like.
Magus55 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.