![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2005 
				Location: Non-theist orbiting the Sun 
				
				
					Posts: 6,761
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1226...eTabs_comments  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: London UK 
				
				
					Posts: 16,024
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Talk Freethought Staff 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2002 
				Location: Toronto, eh 
				
				
					Posts: 42,293
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Ohs nos. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	What's the point of engaging in serious academic thought about a subject if the researchers don't even make sure that their results correspond with the preconceived notions of intransigent ideologues? And once again, the main reaction is the worry that Muslims will riot and make death threats as a results. It's odd that a religion of peace has that happen so often.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2004 
				Location: Dancing 
				
				
					Posts: 9,940
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I predict that he'll be beheaded by the end of the week. Islam is the religion of peace, after all. Piece by piece.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | ||
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2004 
				Location: St. Louis 
				
				
					Posts: 980
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2001 
				Location: Mayfield, NZ 
				
				
					Posts: 1,407
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Interesting ideas. I'd need to study the texts he is working from in more detail. Of course, I would first need to improve my German and probably my Arabic.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2003 
				Location: zero point 
				
				
					Posts: 2,004
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Wow.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2004 
				Location: Osaka / London 
				
				
					Posts: 1,993
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I heard from this guy before I think he was saying something interesting about how the language of the Qu'ran.  The program I was watching then switched to a British Muslim scholar who labelled his theories as wild conjecture.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 416
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Is it an insult to Muhammed to think - or even claim - he didn't exist? Of course not; you can't insult someone who never existed. Surely those rioters and beheaders will soon realize that they have no case against Muhammad Sven Kalisch.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	That only applies to the rioters and beheaders who think rationally, of course. ; MSK himself may even wish to reconsider his choice of a first name. Or his entire name, for that matter. Under the circumstances, he might consider changing it to something less controversial like Osama bin Laden, Idi Amin or George Bush.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2002 
				Location: N/A 
				
				
					Posts: 4,370
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Like Rushie, he's forgotten that Islam is not a peaceful and innocuous minority. The consequent violence then leaves the liberal establishment with a dilemma. Do they continue to champion Islam as part of their anti-Christian policies (mainly because of "do not commit adultery"), even though it is their own class that is under attack; or do they put their own interests first and attack Islam (while trying to minimise the damage to their policy of promoting it). In the Rushdie case they did the latter. Probably the same will happen here. All the best, Roger Pearse  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |