![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 496
|
![]()
From: Newton Joseph
Date: 06/13/04 08:57:58 Subject: Fw: Tom Harpur - A Pagan Christ PAGAN CHRISTS > New Message on A Room for Heresy> > ----------------------------------------------------------- > From: .Zoraida. > Message 8 in Discussion > > > The greatest myth ever told > > Religion writer and former Anglican priest Tom Harpur admits he's sticking > his neck out for proffering that someone named Jesus never walked this Earth > > It is disconcerting, to say the least, for Canada's best-known religion > writer to decide that Jesus Christ did not exist. > That is the contention of Tom Harpur's new book, The Pagan Christ. The > former Anglican priest and Toronto Star religion editor for the past 35 > years, has come to believe that there was never a man named Jesus, and that > most of the miracles and wonders ascribed to him in the New Testament did > not happen. > > Even more astonishing, he argues that most of the Christ story was borrowed > by the early church from ancient religions, which the church then suppressed > in "the greatest cover-up of all time." > > The chief religion to be ransacked was that of Egypt, already 3,000 years > old when Christianity was founded. Egypt, he writes, supplied the "virgin > birth, a star in the east, three wise men bearing gifts, the evil power that > tries to take a special child's life, and angelic messengers." The Egyptian > hieroglyph KRST, meaning the anointed one, was applied to the deity Horus, > who was born of a mortal woman and later crucified between two thieves. > > And yet -- for all this -- Harpur is still a believing Christian. "I'm not > interested in debunking," says the white-haired 70-plus Harpur, who has > already been attacked by an assortment of prominent fundamentalists. "I want > to help see the church through this century. Right now it's in crisis. The > book tries to provide a fresh vision." > > He considers the popularity of Mel Gibson's Passion movie a demonstration of > how unhealthily dependent people have become on a historic Jesus who never > existed. > > In Harpur's view, the core message that Christianity shares with the other > great religions of the Middle East is that God has given every human being a > spark of divinity, which can be realized through spiritual struggle. The > Egyptians symbolized this in a deity they called "Iusa" (which possibly > later became the name Jesus) and wove a mythology of stories about his > painful transformation into a human being. But neither the Egyptians, nor > the Persians who possessed a similar mythology, ever claimed that such a > person really existed. "The truth was always esoteric," Harpur says. "It was > symbolized in the stories, but it wasn't history." > > There is evidence that the early church fathers shared the view that there > was no historic Jesus. But some time in the third and fourth centuries, > Harpur argues, it was decided that a historic Jesus would give the new faith > a distinctive quality not possessed by the powerful pagan faiths it was > competing with. The many gospels and early writings that reflected the old, > symbolic view of Jesus were suppressed, and the few -- four, to be exact -- > that claimed he had actually lived were retained. > > How did a man trained as a priest, who taught New Testament theology for > many years, and defended it for decades in his newspaper column, come to > such a drastic re-appraisal of his beliefs? > > Harpur says he had been troubled for many years by illogicalities in the New > Testament, such as the claim that Jesus was tried before three different > courts during the single night of the Passion. He was also dismayed to > discover while teaching theology at the University of Toronto that a couple > of buildings away the very devout scholar Northrop Frye was teaching his > students that any accurate history found in the Bible was only there by > accident. > > By 1990, when he wrote Finding the Still Point, Harpur had come to believe > that the story of a Jesus who walked around Galilee performing magic had > become an obstacle to people searching for the deep meaning of Christianity. > "It was a leading of the spirit. But I didn't know that a book like The > Pagan Christ was down the road." > > The final blow to his old beliefs arrived in his mailbox a couple of years > ago. > > "People have always sent me their manuscripts for one religious book or > another, since I am a religion editor," he explains. "One day, about 2½ > years ago, I got a manuscript from a guy who wrote: 'You might be open to > this.' It was about a writer named Alvin Boyd Kuhn, who I had never read." > > Kuhn was an American scholar of ancient Middle Eastern languages who died in > 1963. While studying the vast body of Egyptian writings, Kuhn had been > perturbed by occasional, oddly familiar passages. A poem in honour of Horus, > for example, would begin with the words, "He was despised and shunned by > men, a man of pain who knew what sickness was." > > Kuhn recorded these similarities to New Testament language, and soon had a > list of many hundreds of passages. > > He was not, of course, the first to notice these oddities. Almost from the > time it was possible to decipher the hieroglyphs, in the early 1800s, > scholars were aware of them. Religious authorities decided that they merely > "foreshadowed" the truth of Christianity, and few experts dared to disagree. > Even Wallis Budge, the British Museum's Egyptian authority in the early 20th > century, amassed volumes of research showing that pretty much the whole New > Testament was in the hieroglyphs. But he dutifully concluded that it was > just "foreshadowing." > > Only a few scholars have come out and said flatly that Christianity is an > evolution of the old "pagan" religions: Godfrey Higgins and Gerald Massey in > the 19th century, and Alvin Kuhn in the 20th. > > Reading Kuhn's books finally persuaded Harpur to set aside the historic > Jesus. But it was a lengthy and painful process of wrestling both with > Kuhn's evidence and with his own past. "I was raised with the idea of being > saved 'in Jesus's arms,' " says Harpur, whose own parents were > fundamentalist Christians. "So I know the Scriptures the way the > fundamentalists know them." > > Is he afraid of being shunned by believers, especially his fellow Anglicans? > > "Well, you need a community. And it will be very painful, there will be > grief for people who are seized by the cogency of my case but are wedded to > the comfort of traditional faith. There's a personal grieving process if > you're going to do this. But I am committed to doing as the Spirit leads > me." > > Kuhn, after a lifetime of writing and arguing and giving speeches in support > of his ideas, was studiously ignored by Christian scholars and his books > were forgotten the day that he died. Does Harpur fear the same might happen > to him? > > "I don't think so. We're living in a different time now. Ideas are > disseminated on the Internet, and the control of the mainstream religions > over the public conversation is much weaker than it was only 40 years ago." > > He also believes that the millions of people who have abandoned mainstream > religion in recent decades did so partly because it has become hard to > believe in a magical god/man who changes water to wine and brings the dead > back to life. "The things I'm saying don't downgrade the Jesus story. > Instead, they save us from this plodding tale of a magic wonder worker, > which is so hard for modern people to believe." > > Of course, even as millions have left the churches, millions more have > declared themselves believers in a fiercely and literally historic Jesus. > These are the fundamentalists who watch religious television, such as 100 > Huntley Street. That show has already invited a Christian expert on air to > savage Harpur's book. "It was a guy I've never met who kept repeating, 'I > love you, Tom Harpur.' Of course, they didn't invite me on the program." > > Not to mention the millions who are flocking to see the violently literal > rendition of Christ's passion in Mel Gibson's movie. "It is simply > grotesque, that movie," says Harpur, although he acknowledges that the > publishers of The Pagan Christ moved up the publication date in order to > take advantage of the oceans of media attention generated by the film. > > "The rise of fundamentalism is because we live in scary times," Harpur says. > "The appeal of the absolute is very great. The idea that we are the winning > side. The kind of language [President] Bush is using to justify killing > Iraqis." > > In Harpur's view, the insistence on Jesus's literal existence is the main > obstacle to reconciliation between Christianity and the other great > religions, none of which relies on a literal god-man as a founder. "How will > we ever escape the impasse of a billion and a half people who say that they > possess the exclusive truth. [Theologian] Hans Kung has said we can never > have world peace until that is resolved." > > But what exactly will be left of Christianity if it loses the figure of > Jesus Christ? > > "It will be a more mystical religion," Harpur says. "But not less practical. > After all, this business of letting Jesus do it for you doesn't look so good > after what we've seen in the past 2,000 years." > >[email protected] www.atheistfellowship.com > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|